Skip to content
etf.net

AOA vs RMHY

iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

AOAANYSE Arca

Global X Adaptive Risk Managed Yield ETF

RMHYBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

AOA −0.15pt a year

AOA0.15%RMHY0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

AOA 3.3×the volume

AOA135KRMHY40.7K

AOA vs RMHY Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−0.3%AOA−1.4%RMHY

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. AOA −0.3%. RMHY −1.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2%1%2%3%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AOA 0.15%, better
RMHY 0.30%
Fund size
AOA $3.32B
RMHY $54M
1Y total return
AOA +10.1%
RMHY No data
Yield (12M)
AOA 2.19%
RMHY No data
Holdings
AOA 34240
RMHY 2
Avg volume (30D)
AOA 135K sh, better
RMHY 40.7K sh
NAV per share
AOA $96.21
RMHY $24.26
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AOA: Cost 93, Risk 55, Mission 100, Tradability 96, Holdings 81, Durability 98. RMHY: Cost 78, Risk 58, Mission not scored, Tradability 59, Holdings 26, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for AOA, RMHY, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAOARMHY
Cost30% weightA93HigherA78
Mission25% weightA100Not scored
Risk15% weightB55B58Higher
Tradability15% weightA96HigherB59
Holdings10% weightA81HigherD26
Durability5% weightA98HigherD33

Rank among Multi-Asset Allocation funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AOA and RMHY are both graded against the same 37 Multi-Asset Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Multi-Asset Allocation⁠

Category · 37 funds
See all 37 ›

AOA ranks 2nd and RMHY 12th of 37 funds in the Multi-Asset Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AUCBGState Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETFScore 95
  2. Rank 2AAOAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETFScore 88
  3. Rank 3AIRTRiShares LifePath Retirement ETFScore 86
  4. Rank 12BOCIOClearShares OCIO ETFScore 60
  5. Rank 12BRMHYGlobal X Adaptive Risk Managed Yield ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 14BELMElm Market Navigator ETFScore 58

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AOAAiShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF

RMHYBGlobal X Adaptive Risk Managed Yield ETF

In short

AOA A whole portfolio in one ticker. Since 2008, AOA has held a fixed 80/20 mix of global stock and bond index funds, with its index rebalancing the split back to target twice a year. No spreadsheet required.

RMHY No data

Stated mandate

AOA The Fund seeks to follow an index of equity and fixed-income ETFs designed for an aggressive target-risk allocation. It offers a diversified portfolio emphasizing growth and relatively higher equity exposure.

RMHY No data

Why people hold it

  • AOA One trade buys a handful of underlying iShares index funds spanning global stocks and bonds, with the 80/20 split set by index rule rather than a manager's judgment call.ishares.comspglobal.com
  • Costs 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026 (0.19% gross), below the median fee in its allocation category.
  • Live since November 2008 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund, it has run the same target-risk mandate through the financial crisis and everything after.ishares.com
  • Among the strongest implementations in a crowded field of allocation funds, and it pays out quarterly.

RMHY No data

Worth knowing

  • AOA Eighty percent equity means it rides global stock swings closely. The 20% bond sleeve softens drawdowns rather than stopping them.spglobal.com
  • That 0.15% is net of a contractual waiver through November 30, 2026. The gross 0.19% is the figure that applies if the waiver is not renewed.
  • Cheaper one-ticket rivals now exist: UCBG at 0.06% and IRTR at 0.08%. IRTR also glides its risk down over time, while AOA's 80/20 stays put.

RMHY No data

Full AOA profile⁠

Full RMHY profile⁠

AOA vs RMHY Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AOA vs RMHY Cost

Overpaying RMHY vs AOA

$3,012

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AOA 0.15%

    $3,137

  • RMHY 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AOA 0.15%
  • RMHY 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530RMHY $6,149AOA $3,137

Year by year

YearAOARMHYOverpaying
10$274$545$271
20$1,071$2,113$1,042
30$3,137$6,149$3,012

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%AOA, cheaper
  • 0.30%RMHY
  • Middle half of Multi-Asset Allocation funds
  • Median 0.57%

AOA 3rd cheapest of 37 funds

RMHY 9th cheapest of 37 funds

AOA vs RMHY Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AOA 2.19%
RMHY No data
Payout (12M)
AOA $2.11
RMHY No data
Last payment
AOA $0.30
RMHY $0.14
Ex-dividend
AOA Oct 2, 2026
RMHY Oct 1, 2026
Paid on
AOA Oct 7, 2026
RMHY Oct 6, 2026
Frequency
AOA Quarterly
RMHY Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

AOAQuarterly · 15 paymentsAll AOA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 15 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Apr 4, 2023 $0.18; Jul 5, 2023 $0.50; Oct 3, 2023 $0.22; Dec 22, 2023 $0.63; Apr 2, 2024 $0.21; Jul 2, 2024 $0.55; Oct 2, 2024 $0.27; Dec 20, 2024 $0.74; Apr 2, 2025 $0.22; Jul 2, 2025 $0.62; Oct 2, 2025 $0.25; Dec 23, 2025 $0.86; Apr 2, 2026 $0.28; Jul 2, 2026 $0.68; Oct 2, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD
RMHYMonthly · 3 paymentsAll RMHY payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Aug 3, 2026 $0.13; Sep 1, 2026 $0.14; Oct 1, 2026 $0.14. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$120232026YTD

AOA vs RMHY Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AOA 9.6%RMHY No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AOA 1.37RMHY No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AOA −23.6%RMHY No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AOA 1.06RMHY 0.78

AOA and RMHY in the news

All news⁠

Popular comparisons

  • AOAAvsUCBGA

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RMHYBvsUCBGA

    Global X Adaptive Risk Managed Yield ETF · State Street SPDR UC Investments 90/10 Endowment Strategy Index ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.06%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AOAAvsIRTRA

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RMHYBvsIRTRA

    Global X Adaptive Risk Managed Yield ETF · iShares LifePath Retirement ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.08%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AOAAvsINCEA

    iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • RMHYBvsINCEA

    Global X Adaptive Risk Managed Yield ETF · Franklin Income Equity Focus ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.29%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.