SCYB ranks 1st and AOHY 57th of 84 funds in the US High Yield Category.
AOHY vs SCYB
SCYB −0.52pt a year
0.55%0.03%
SCYB 18.1×the volume
61K1.1M
AOHY vs SCYB Performance
+3.0%+2.0%
- AOHY 0.55%
- SCYB 0.03%, better
- AOHY $116M
- SCYB $2.8B
- AOHY +3.0%, better
- SCYB +2.0%
- AOHY 7.40%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- AOHY 177
- SCYB 1844
- AOHY 61K sh
- SCYB 1.1M sh, better
- AOHY $10.72
- SCYB $25.22
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOHY | SCYB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F21 | A100Higher |
| Mission | A80 | A100Higher |
| Risk | B62Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | C50 | A88Higher |
| Holdings | C50 | A99Higher |
| Durability | C43 | B68Higher |
Rank among US High Yield funds
Same Category. AOHY and SCYB are both graded against the same 84 US High Yield funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOHYC
SCYBA
In short
AOHY An actively managed junk-bond fund in an aisle stacked with ultra-cheap index trackers. The mandate is income first, capital appreciation second, and the cash goes out monthly.
SCYB Three basis points for the broad US high-yield corporate market. Schwab undercuts a category where the typical fund charges more than ten times as much, spreading the bet across roughly 1,800 bonds and paying monthly.
Stated mandate
AOHY The fund seeks a high level of current income and, secondarily, capital appreciation.
SCYB The fund follows a rules-based strategy intended to track the high-yield bond market, primarily through bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays US Corporate High Yield Total Return Index and similar derivatives.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOHY vs SCYB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOHY vs SCYB Cost
Overpaying AOHY vs SCYB
$10,266
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOHY 0.55%
$10,904
SCYB 0.03%
$638
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOHY | SCYB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $988 | $55 | $933 |
| 20 | $3,790 | $216 | $3,574 |
| 30 | $10,904 | $638 | $10,266 |
- 0.55%AOHY
- 0.03%SCYB, cheaper
- Middle half of US High Yield funds
- Median 0.42%
SCYB cheapest of 84 funds
AOHY 64th cheapest of 84 funds
AOHY vs SCYB Dividends
- AOHY 7.40%, better
- SCYB 7.14%
- AOHY $0.79
- SCYB $1.80
- AOHY $0.06
- SCYB $0.16
- AOHY Oct 30, 2026
- SCYB Oct 1, 2026
- AOHY Pays Nov 2, 2026
- SCYB Oct 7, 2026
- AOHY Monthly
- SCYB Monthly
Distribution history
AOHY vs SCYB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOHY 3.5%SCYB 4.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AOHY 0.54SCYB 0.82
- Worst fall
- AOHY −4.2%SCYB −4.9%
- Market sensitivity
- AOHY 0.43SCYB 0.28
AOHY and SCYB in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.55% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.55% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.03% · 0.08%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
