AOM ranks 2nd and AVMA 3rd of 5 funds in the Balanced Allocation Category.
AOM vs AVMA
AOM −0.06pt a year
0.15%0.21%
AOM 29.5×the volume
308K10.4K
AVMA +4.7pt
+12.1%+16.8%
AOM vs AVMA Performance
+5.1%+12.7%
- AOM 0.15%, better
- AVMA 0.21%
- AOM $1.88B
- AVMA $94M
- AOM +5.1%
- AVMA +12.7%, better
- AOM 3.18%, better
- AVMA 2.46%
- AOM 34237
- AVMA 18
- AOM 308K sh, better
- AVMA 10.4K sh
- AOM $48.72
- AVMA $72.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOM | AVMA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | B58 |
| Mission | A100Higher | C53 |
| Risk | B66Higher | C52 |
| Tradability | B58 | B59Higher |
| Holdings | A100Higher | A86 |
| Durability | A76Higher | C40 |
Rank among Balanced Allocation funds
Same Category. AOM and AVMA are both graded against the same 5 Balanced Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOMA
AVMAB
In short
AOM Wall Street's balanced portfolio in one ticker, tilted toward bonds: 40% stocks, 60% fixed income, held through a handful of iShares funds and tracking an S&P target-risk index since 2008.
AVMA A one-ticket 65/35 balanced fund built entirely from Avantis' own ETFs, so the stock side leans toward cheaper, more profitable companies instead of simply tracking the market. All-in cost: 0.21%.
Stated mandate
AOM The Fund seeks to track an index composed of underlying equity and fixed income funds intended to represent a moderate target-risk allocation strategy.
AVMA The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a strategic allocation providing broad market exposure while emphasizing securities with higher expected returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOM vs AVMA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOM vs AVMA Cost
Overpaying AVMA vs AOM
$1,220
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOM 0.15%
$3,137
AVMA 0.21%
$4,357
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOM | AVMA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $383 | $109 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,491 | $420 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $4,357 | $1,220 |
- 0.15%AOM, cheaper
- 0.21%AVMA
- Middle half of Balanced Allocation funds
- Median 0.21%
AOM cheapest of 5 funds
AVMA 3rd cheapest of 5 funds
AOM vs AVMA Dividends
- AOM 3.18%, better
- AVMA 2.46%
- AOM $1.55
- AVMA $1.77
- AOM $0.30
- AVMA $0.31
- AOM Oct 2, 2026
- AVMA Sep 10, 2026
- AOM Oct 7, 2026
- AVMA Sep 14, 2026
- AOM Quarterly
- AVMA Quarterly
Distribution history
AOM vs AVMA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOM 6.8%, betterAVMA 9.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- AOM 1.08AVMA 1.29, better
- Worst fall
- AOM −20.0%AVMA −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- AOM 0.77AVMA 0.91
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.