AOM ranks 2nd and CGBL 4th of 5 funds in the Balanced Allocation Category.
AOM vs CGBL
AOM −0.18pt a year
0.15%0.33%
CGBL 4.7×the volume
308K1.43M
CGBL +4.7pt
+12.1%+16.8%
AOM vs CGBL Performance
+5.1%+7.5%
- AOM 0.15%, better
- CGBL 0.33%
- AOM $1.88B
- CGBL $7.97B
- AOM +5.1%
- CGBL +7.5%, better
- AOM 3.18%, better
- CGBL 1.96%
- AOM 34237
- CGBL 78
- AOM 308K sh
- CGBL 1.43M sh, better
- AOM $48.72
- CGBL $36.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOM | CGBL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | D28 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B69 |
| Risk | B66Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | B58 | B69Higher |
| Holdings | A100Higher | A91 |
| Durability | A76Higher | B67 |
Rank among Balanced Allocation funds
Same Category. AOM and CGBL are both graded against the same 5 Balanced Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AOMA
CGBLC
In short
AOM Wall Street's balanced portfolio in one ticker, tilted toward bonds: 40% stocks, 60% fixed income, held through a handful of iShares funds and tracking an S&P target-risk index since 2008.
CGBL Capital Group's take on the 60/40: one ticket that owns both stocks and bonds, US and international, chasing balanced total return with an eye on preserving capital. Live since 2023 and already a multi-billion-dollar fund.
Stated mandate
AOM The Fund seeks to track an index composed of underlying equity and fixed income funds intended to represent a moderate target-risk allocation strategy.
CGBL The fund seeks balanced total return, including income and capital gains, while aiming to preserve capital over the long term.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOM vs CGBL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOM vs CGBL Cost
Overpaying CGBL vs AOM
$3,600
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOM 0.15%
$3,137
CGBL 0.33%
$6,737
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOM | CGBL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $598 | $324 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,318 | $1,247 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $6,737 | $3,600 |
- 0.15%AOM, cheaper
- 0.33%CGBL
- Middle half of Balanced Allocation funds
- Median 0.21%
AOM cheapest of 5 funds
CGBL 5th cheapest of 5 funds
AOM vs CGBL Dividends
- AOM 3.18%, better
- CGBL 1.96%
- AOM $1.55
- CGBL $0.72
- AOM $0.30
- CGBL $0.21
- AOM Oct 2, 2026
- CGBL Sep 30, 2026
- AOM Oct 7, 2026
- CGBL Oct 1, 2026
- AOM Quarterly
- CGBL Quarterly
Distribution history
AOM vs CGBL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOM 6.8%, betterCGBL 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AOM 1.08CGBL 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- AOM −20.0%CGBL −11.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AOM 0.77CGBL 0.70
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.