Skip to content

AOM vs CGBL

iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

AOMANYSE Arca

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF

CGBLCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

AOM −0.18pt a year

AOM0.15%CGBL0.33%

Avg volume · 30D

CGBL 4.7×the volume

AOM308KCGBL1.43M

3Y return · a year

CGBL +4.7pt

AOM+12.1%CGBL+16.8%

AOM vs CGBL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+5.1%AOM+7.5%CGBL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AOM +5.1%. CGBL +7.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%10%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AOM 0.15%, better
CGBL 0.33%
Fund size
AOM $1.88B
CGBL $7.97B
1Y total return
AOM +5.1%
CGBL +7.5%, better
Yield (12M)
AOM 3.18%, better
CGBL 1.96%
Holdings
AOM 34237
CGBL 78
Avg volume (30D)
AOM 308K sh
CGBL 1.43M sh, better
NAV per share
AOM $48.72
CGBL $36.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AOM: Cost 81, Risk 66, Mission 100, Tradability 58, Holdings 100, Durability 76. CGBL: Cost 28, Risk 36, Mission 69, Tradability 69, Holdings 91, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for AOM, CGBL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAOMCGBL
Cost30% weightA81HigherD28
Mission25% weightA100HigherB69
Risk15% weightB66HigherD36
Tradability15% weightB58B69Higher
Holdings10% weightA100HigherA91
Durability5% weightA76HigherB67

Rank among Balanced Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AOM and CGBL are both graded against the same 5 Balanced Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Balanced Allocation⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

AOM ranks 2nd and CGBL 4th of 5 funds in the Balanced Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AAORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AAOMiShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3BAVMAAvantis Moderate Allocation ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4CCGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 5CDDXDefined Duration 10 ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AOMAiShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

CGBLCCapital Group Core Balanced ETF

In short

AOM Wall Street's balanced portfolio in one ticker, tilted toward bonds: 40% stocks, 60% fixed income, held through a handful of iShares funds and tracking an S&P target-risk index since 2008.

CGBL Capital Group's take on the 60/40: one ticket that owns both stocks and bonds, US and international, chasing balanced total return with an eye on preserving capital. Live since 2023 and already a multi-billion-dollar fund.

Stated mandate

AOM The Fund seeks to track an index composed of underlying equity and fixed income funds intended to represent a moderate target-risk allocation strategy.

CGBL The fund seeks balanced total return, including income and capital gains, while aiming to preserve capital over the long term.

Why people hold it

  • AOM Fee is 0.15%, net of a waiver through November 30, 2026, and below the typical cost in its small category. Gross runs 0.20% if that waiver lapses.
  • Undercuts moderate-allocation rivals AVMA (0.21%) and CGBL (0.33%), neither of which leans on a waiver.
  • One ticker buys a global stock-and-bond mix and holds it at target. The index handles the rebalancing, so you are not trimming sleeves by hand.
  • Trading since 2008 and now a multi-billion-dollar fund that has hugged its index closely. One of the stronger builds in a thin peer group.
  • CGBL One ticket, two asset classes: seeks balanced total return from income and capital gains while aiming to preserve capital over the long term, across US and international holdings.
  • Holdings stay legible for a balanced fund: a compact lineup of roughly 70 positions rather than a sprawl of thousands.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so getting in or out doesn't hinge on a thin order book.
  • Distributions land quarterly inside a plain 1940 Act fund wrapper, which means 1099 season, not partnership K-1 paperwork.

Worth knowing

  • AOM Bonds are the bigger half, so stock swings land with less force here than in equity-heavier sibling AOR (also 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026).
  • Moderately traded rather than heavily traded, which can mean wider spreads around the open and close.
  • You own funds that own funds: the line items are iShares ETFs, not individual stocks and bonds.
  • CGBL At 0.33% it runs above the typical moderate-allocation fund, and index-built rivals like AOM and AOR charge 0.20%.
  • No index to hug. The mandate is an objective (balanced total return with capital preservation), so the stock-bond mix reflects manager judgment, not a rulebook.
  • It launched in late 2023, a short history for a fund built to be held through cycles.

Full AOM profile⁠

Full CGBL profile⁠

AOM vs CGBL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AOM vs CGBL Cost

Overpaying CGBL vs AOM

$3,600

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AOM 0.15%

    $3,137

  • CGBL 0.33%

    $6,737

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AOM 0.15%
  • CGBL 0.33%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CGBL $6,737AOM $3,137

Year by year

YearAOMCGBLOverpaying
10$274$598$324
20$1,071$2,318$1,247
30$3,137$6,737$3,600

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%AOM, cheaper
  • 0.33%CGBL
  • Middle half of Balanced Allocation funds
  • Median 0.21%

AOM cheapest of 5 funds

CGBL 5th cheapest of 5 funds

AOM vs CGBL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AOM 3.18%, better
CGBL 1.96%
Payout (12M)
AOM $1.55
CGBL $0.72
Last payment
AOM $0.30
CGBL $0.21
Ex-dividend
AOM Oct 2, 2026
CGBL Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
AOM Oct 7, 2026
CGBL Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
AOM Quarterly
CGBL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AOMQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll AOM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Apr 4, 2017 $0.14; Jul 6, 2017 $0.25; Oct 3, 2017 $0.16; Dec 28, 2017 $0.71; Apr 3, 2018 $0.17; Jul 3, 2018 $0.29; Oct 2, 2018 $0.20; Dec 28, 2018 $0.25; Apr 2, 2019 $0.21; Jul 2, 2019 $0.34; Oct 2, 2019 $0.20; Dec 24, 2019 $0.31; Apr 2, 2020 $0.19; Jul 2, 2020 $0.26; Oct 2, 2020 $0.16; Dec 24, 2020 $0.27; Apr 5, 2021 $0.11; Jul 2, 2021 $0.19; Oct 4, 2021 $0.12; Dec 23, 2021 $0.29; Apr 4, 2022 $0.13; Jul 5, 2022 $0.26; Oct 4, 2022 $0.17; Dec 23, 2022 $0.30; Apr 4, 2023 $0.19; Jul 5, 2023 $0.30; Oct 3, 2023 $0.22; Dec 22, 2023 $0.45; Apr 2, 2024 $0.22; Jul 2, 2024 $0.34; Oct 2, 2024 $0.26; Dec 20, 2024 $0.53; Apr 2, 2025 $0.25; Jul 2, 2025 $0.37; Oct 2, 2025 $0.27; Dec 23, 2025 $0.53; Apr 2, 2026 $0.31; Jul 2, 2026 $0.41; Oct 2, 2026 $0.30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD
CGBLQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll CGBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.13; Mar 28, 2024 $0.11; Jun 28, 2024 $0.14; Sep 30, 2024 $0.15; Dec 26, 2024 $0.21; Mar 31, 2025 $0.12; Jun 30, 2025 $0.16; Sep 30, 2025 $0.19; Dec 26, 2025 $0.23; Mar 31, 2026 $0.13; Jun 30, 2026 $0.16; Sep 30, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502017202020232026YTD

AOM vs CGBL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AOM 6.8%, betterCGBL 9.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AOM 1.08CGBL 1.27, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AOM −20.0%CGBL −11.7%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AOM 0.77CGBL 0.70

Popular comparisons

  • AOMAvsAORA

    iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF · iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGBLCvsAORA

    Capital Group Core Balanced ETF · iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AOMAvsAVMAB

    iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF · Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGBLCvsAVMAB

    Capital Group Core Balanced ETF · Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AOMAvsDDXC

    iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF · Defined Duration 10 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGBLCvsDDXC

    Capital Group Core Balanced ETF · Defined Duration 10 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.