AOR ranks 1st and AVMA 3rd of 5 funds in the Balanced Allocation Category.
AOR vs AVMA
AOR −0.06pt a year
0.15%0.21%
AOR 41.6×the volume
433K10.4K
AVMA +1.5pt
+15.3%+16.8%
AOR vs AVMA Performance
+7.6%+12.7%
- AOR 0.15%, better
- AVMA 0.21%
- AOR $3.89B
- AVMA $94M
- AOR +7.6%
- AVMA +12.7%, better
- AOR 2.66%, better
- AVMA 2.46%
- AOR 34238
- AVMA 18
- AOR 433K sh, better
- AVMA 10.4K sh
- AOR $68.12
- AVMA $72.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOR | AVMA |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | B58 |
| Mission | A100Higher | C53 |
| Risk | C51 | C52Higher |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B59 |
| Holdings | A100Higher | A86 |
| Durability | A82Higher | C40 |
Rank among Balanced Allocation funds
Same Category. AOR and AVMA are both graded against the same 5 Balanced Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AORA
AVMAB
In short
AOR One ticker, one whole 60/40 portfolio: a short list of iShares stock and bond ETFs, live since 2008, at 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026 (0.20% gross).
AVMA A one-ticket 65/35 balanced fund built entirely from Avantis' own ETFs, so the stock side leans toward cheaper, more profitable companies instead of simply tracking the market. All-in cost: 0.21%.
Stated mandate
AOR The fund seeks to track an index of underlying equity and fixed-income funds designed to represent a growth-oriented target-risk allocation.
AVMA The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a strategic allocation providing broad market exposure while emphasizing securities with higher expected returns.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOR vs AVMA Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOR vs AVMA Cost
Overpaying AVMA vs AOR
$1,220
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOR 0.15%
$3,137
AVMA 0.21%
$4,357
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOR | AVMA | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $383 | $109 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $1,491 | $420 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $4,357 | $1,220 |
- 0.15%AOR, cheaper
- 0.21%AVMA
- Middle half of Balanced Allocation funds
- Median 0.21%
AOR cheapest of 5 funds
AVMA 3rd cheapest of 5 funds
AOR vs AVMA Dividends
- AOR 2.66%, better
- AVMA 2.46%
- AOR $1.81
- AVMA $1.77
- AOR $0.31
- AVMA $0.31
- AOR Oct 2, 2026
- AVMA Sep 10, 2026
- AOR Oct 7, 2026
- AVMA Sep 14, 2026
- AOR Quarterly
- AVMA Quarterly
Distribution history
AOR vs AVMA Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOR 8.2%, betterAVMA 9.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- AOR 1.26AVMA 1.29, better
- Worst fall
- AOR −21.7%AVMA −11.8%
- Market sensitivity
- AOR 0.91AVMA 0.91Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
AOR and AVMA in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.21% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


