Skip to content

AOR vs CGBL

iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

AORANYSE Arca

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF

CGBLCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

AOR −0.18pt a year

AOR0.15%CGBL0.33%

Avg volume · 30D

CGBL 3.3×the volume

AOR433KCGBL1.43M

3Y return · a year

CGBL +1.5pt

AOR+15.3%CGBL+16.8%

AOR vs CGBL Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+7.6%AOR+7.5%CGBL

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AOR +7.6%. CGBL +7.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−2.5%0%2.5%10%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AOR 0.15%, better
CGBL 0.33%
Fund size
AOR $3.89B
CGBL $7.97B
1Y total return
AOR +7.6%, better
CGBL +7.5%
Yield (12M)
AOR 2.66%, better
CGBL 1.96%
Holdings
AOR 34238
CGBL 78
Avg volume (30D)
AOR 433K sh
CGBL 1.43M sh, better
NAV per share
AOR $68.12
CGBL $36.68
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AOR: Cost 81, Risk 51, Mission 100, Tradability 74, Holdings 100, Durability 82. CGBL: Cost 28, Risk 36, Mission 69, Tradability 69, Holdings 91, Durability 67.
Pillar letters and Scores for AOR, CGBL, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAORCGBL
Cost30% weightA81HigherD28
Mission25% weightA100HigherB69
Risk15% weightC51HigherD36
Tradability15% weightA74HigherB69
Holdings10% weightA100HigherA91
Durability5% weightA82HigherB67

Rank among Balanced Allocation funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AOR and CGBL are both graded against the same 5 Balanced Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Balanced Allocation⁠

Category · 5 funds
See all 5 ›

AOR ranks 1st and CGBL 4th of 5 funds in the Balanced Allocation Category.

  1. Rank 1AAORiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETFScore 82
  2. Rank 2AAOMiShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETFScore 81
  3. Rank 3BAVMAAvantis Moderate Allocation ETFScore 57
  4. Rank 4CCGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 5CDDXDefined Duration 10 ETFScore 42

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AORAiShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF

CGBLCCapital Group Core Balanced ETF

In short

AOR One ticker, one whole 60/40 portfolio: a short list of iShares stock and bond ETFs, live since 2008, at 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026 (0.20% gross).

CGBL Capital Group's take on the 60/40: one ticket that owns both stocks and bonds, US and international, chasing balanced total return with an eye on preserving capital. Live since 2023 and already a multi-billion-dollar fund.

Stated mandate

AOR The fund seeks to track an index of underlying equity and fixed-income funds designed to represent a growth-oriented target-risk allocation.

CGBL The fund seeks balanced total return, including income and capital gains, while aiming to preserve capital over the long term.

Why people hold it

  • AOR The index holds the stock and bond ETFs and keeps the mix at roughly 60% equities and 40% bonds, so the rebalancing happens inside the fund, not in your account.ishares.com
  • At 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026 (0.20% gross), it sits below the category median and under peers like AVMA at 0.21% and CGBL at 0.33%.ishares.com
  • Trading since November 2008, it is now a multi-billion-dollar fund that pays quarterly, and sibling AOM runs the same plumbing at a 40/60 mix.ishares.com
  • It holds what the label says and stays tight to its benchmark, which is the entire job here: one of the strongest implementations in its peer group.
  • CGBL One ticket, two asset classes: seeks balanced total return from income and capital gains while aiming to preserve capital over the long term, across US and international holdings.
  • Holdings stay legible for a balanced fund: a compact lineup of roughly 70 positions rather than a sprawl of thousands.
  • A multi-billion-dollar fund that trades actively, so getting in or out doesn't hinge on a thin order book.
  • Distributions land quarterly inside a plain 1940 Act fund wrapper, which means 1099 season, not partnership K-1 paperwork.

Worth knowing

  • AOR The 0.15% net nets out the 0.05% of fees charged by the iShares funds it owns. That waiver is contractual through November 30, 2026, not permanent.ishares.comishares.com 2
  • The split is set by the index, so you cannot tilt stocks or bonds yourself, and the 40% bond sleeve brings interest-rate sensitivity along with the ballast.ishares.com
  • History before February 2025 sits under the old names: iShares Core Growth Allocation ETF, tracking the S&P Target Risk Growth Index.sec.govishares.com
  • CGBL At 0.33% it runs above the typical moderate-allocation fund, and index-built rivals like AOM and AOR charge 0.20%.
  • No index to hug. The mandate is an objective (balanced total return with capital preservation), so the stock-bond mix reflects manager judgment, not a rulebook.
  • It launched in late 2023, a short history for a fund built to be held through cycles.

Full AOR profile⁠

Full CGBL profile⁠

AOR vs CGBL Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AOR vs CGBL Cost

Overpaying CGBL vs AOR

$3,600

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AOR 0.15%

    $3,137

  • CGBL 0.33%

    $6,737

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AOR 0.15%
  • CGBL 0.33%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530CGBL $6,737AOR $3,137

Year by year

YearAORCGBLOverpaying
10$274$598$324
20$1,071$2,318$1,247
30$3,137$6,737$3,600

Expense ratio

  • 0.15%AOR, cheaper
  • 0.33%CGBL
  • Middle half of Balanced Allocation funds
  • Median 0.21%

AOR cheapest of 5 funds

CGBL 5th cheapest of 5 funds

AOR vs CGBL Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AOR 2.66%, better
CGBL 1.96%
Payout (12M)
AOR $1.81
CGBL $0.72
Last payment
AOR $0.31
CGBL $0.21
Ex-dividend
AOR Oct 2, 2026
CGBL Sep 30, 2026
Paid on
AOR Oct 7, 2026
CGBL Oct 1, 2026
Frequency
AOR Quarterly
CGBL Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AORQuarterly · 39 paymentsAll AOR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 39 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Apr 4, 2017 $0.15; Jul 6, 2017 $0.32; Oct 3, 2017 $0.16; Dec 28, 2017 $1.39; Apr 3, 2018 $0.16; Jul 3, 2018 $0.37; Oct 2, 2018 $0.19; Dec 28, 2018 $0.31; Apr 2, 2019 $0.20; Jul 2, 2019 $0.42; Oct 2, 2019 $0.20; Dec 24, 2019 $0.40; Apr 2, 2020 $0.19; Jul 2, 2020 $0.30; Oct 2, 2020 $0.16; Dec 24, 2020 $0.33; Apr 5, 2021 $0.11; Jul 2, 2021 $0.27; Oct 4, 2021 $0.14; Dec 23, 2021 $0.41; Apr 4, 2022 $0.15; Jul 5, 2022 $0.35; Oct 4, 2022 $0.18; Dec 23, 2022 $0.32; Apr 4, 2023 $0.20; Jul 5, 2023 $0.39; Oct 3, 2023 $0.22; Dec 22, 2023 $0.52; Apr 2, 2024 $0.22; Jul 2, 2024 $0.42; Oct 2, 2024 $0.27; Dec 20, 2024 $0.61; Apr 2, 2025 $0.25; Jul 2, 2025 $0.47; Oct 2, 2025 $0.27; Dec 23, 2025 $0.67; Apr 2, 2026 $0.31; Jul 2, 2026 $0.52; Oct 2, 2026 $0.31. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
CGBLQuarterly · 12 paymentsAll CGBL payments⁠
One bar per payment. 12 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $0.13; Mar 28, 2024 $0.11; Jun 28, 2024 $0.14; Sep 30, 2024 $0.15; Dec 26, 2024 $0.21; Mar 31, 2025 $0.12; Jun 30, 2025 $0.16; Sep 30, 2025 $0.19; Dec 26, 2025 $0.23; Mar 31, 2026 $0.13; Jun 30, 2026 $0.16; Sep 30, 2026 $0.21. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

AOR vs CGBL Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AOR 8.2%, betterCGBL 9.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AOR 1.26CGBL 1.27, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AOR −21.7%CGBL −11.7%since Sep 2023
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AOR 0.91CGBL 0.70

AOR and CGBL in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AORAvsAOMA

    iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF · iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGBLCvsAOMA

    Capital Group Core Balanced ETF · iShares Core 40/60 Moderate Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.15%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AORAvsAVMAB

    iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF · Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGBLCvsAVMAB

    Capital Group Core Balanced ETF · Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.21%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AORAvsDDXC

    iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF · Defined Duration 10 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.15% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGBLCvsDDXC

    Capital Group Core Balanced ETF · Defined Duration 10 ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.33% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.