AOR ranks 1st and CGBL 4th of 5 funds in the Balanced Allocation Category.
AOR vs CGBL
AOR −0.18pt a year
0.15%0.33%
CGBL 3.3×the volume
433K1.43M
CGBL +1.5pt
+15.3%+16.8%
AOR vs CGBL Performance
+7.6%+7.5%
- AOR 0.15%, better
- CGBL 0.33%
- AOR $3.89B
- CGBL $7.97B
- AOR +7.6%, better
- CGBL +7.5%
- AOR 2.66%, better
- CGBL 1.96%
- AOR 34238
- CGBL 78
- AOR 433K sh
- CGBL 1.43M sh, better
- AOR $68.12
- CGBL $36.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AOR | CGBL |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A81Higher | D28 |
| Mission | A100Higher | B69 |
| Risk | C51Higher | D36 |
| Tradability | A74Higher | B69 |
| Holdings | A100Higher | A91 |
| Durability | A82Higher | B67 |
Rank among Balanced Allocation funds
Same Category. AOR and CGBL are both graded against the same 5 Balanced Allocation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AORA
CGBLC
In short
AOR One ticker, one whole 60/40 portfolio: a short list of iShares stock and bond ETFs, live since 2008, at 0.15% net of a waiver through November 30, 2026 (0.20% gross).
CGBL Capital Group's take on the 60/40: one ticket that owns both stocks and bonds, US and international, chasing balanced total return with an eye on preserving capital. Live since 2023 and already a multi-billion-dollar fund.
Stated mandate
AOR The fund seeks to track an index of underlying equity and fixed-income funds designed to represent a growth-oriented target-risk allocation.
CGBL The fund seeks balanced total return, including income and capital gains, while aiming to preserve capital over the long term.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AOR vs CGBL Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AOR vs CGBL Cost
Overpaying CGBL vs AOR
$3,600
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AOR 0.15%
$3,137
CGBL 0.33%
$6,737
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AOR | CGBL | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $598 | $324 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,318 | $1,247 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $6,737 | $3,600 |
- 0.15%AOR, cheaper
- 0.33%CGBL
- Middle half of Balanced Allocation funds
- Median 0.21%
AOR cheapest of 5 funds
CGBL 5th cheapest of 5 funds
AOR vs CGBL Dividends
- AOR 2.66%, better
- CGBL 1.96%
- AOR $1.81
- CGBL $0.72
- AOR $0.31
- CGBL $0.21
- AOR Oct 2, 2026
- CGBL Sep 30, 2026
- AOR Oct 7, 2026
- CGBL Oct 1, 2026
- AOR Quarterly
- CGBL Quarterly
Distribution history
AOR vs CGBL Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AOR 8.2%, betterCGBL 9.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- AOR 1.26CGBL 1.27, better
- Worst fall
- AOR −21.7%CGBL −11.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AOR 0.91CGBL 0.70
AOR and CGBL in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.21%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.33% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


