GRNB ranks 2nd and APLU 11th of 28 funds in the Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) Category.
APLU vs GRNB
GRNB −0.11pt a year
0.31%0.20%
APLU 2.2×the volume
76.2K34.2K
APLU vs GRNB Performance
−0.7%+0.2%
- APLU 0.31%
- GRNB 0.20%, better
- APLU $399M
- GRNB $196M
- APLU −0.7%
- GRNB +0.2%, better
- APLU 5.63%, better
- GRNB 4.94%
- APLU 549
- GRNB 473
- APLU 76.2K sh, better
- GRNB 34.2K sh
- APLU $23.75
- GRNB $23.46
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | APLU | GRNB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A71 | A95Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A93 |
| Risk | D32 | B66Higher |
| Tradability | C51Higher | D26 |
| Holdings | A74 | A100Higher |
| Durability | C41 | C48Higher |
Rank among Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
Same Category. APLU and GRNB are both graded against the same 28 Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
APLUB
GRNBA
In short
APLU An active core-plus bond fund: it measures itself against the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate, then ranges outside it into bank loans, foreign sovereigns and asset-backed paper. Priced below the typical active rival.
GRNB Its peer group is stacked with total-bond-market giants. GRNB goes narrow instead: only dollar-denominated green bonds funding environmental projects, issued worldwide by governments, supranationals and companies. A 2017-vintage specialist at 0.20%.
Stated mandate
APLU The Fund seeks total return from current income and capital appreciation. It normally invests at least 80% of net assets in debt securities, including corporate, mortgage- and asset-backed securities, bank loans, foreign sovereign debt, supranational entity securities, and U.S. Government obligations.
GRNB The fund seeks to track the S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index before fees and expenses. The index covers U.S.-dollar-denominated green bonds financing environmentally friendly projects and issued globally by supranational, government, and corporate entities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
APLU vs GRNB Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
APLU vs GRNB Cost
Overpaying APLU vs GRNB
$2,191
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
APLU 0.31%
$6,346
GRNB 0.20%
$4,155
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | APLU | GRNB | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $563 | $365 | $198 |
| 20 | $2,182 | $1,421 | $761 |
| 30 | $6,346 | $4,155 | $2,191 |
- 0.31%APLU
- 0.20%GRNB, cheaper
- Middle half of Global Aggregate Bond (Unhedged) funds
- Median 0.40%
GRNB 2nd cheapest of 28 funds
APLU 8th cheapest of 28 funds
APLU vs GRNB Dividends
- APLU 5.63%, better
- GRNB 4.94%
- APLU $1.34
- GRNB $1.16
- APLU $0.10
- GRNB $0.10
- APLU Oct 23, 2026
- GRNB Nov 2, 2026
- APLU Oct 27, 2026
- GRNB Pays Nov 5, 2026
- APLU Monthly
- GRNB Monthly
Distribution history
APLU vs GRNB Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- APLU 4.4%GRNB 4.4%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- APLU −0.15GRNB 0.30
- Worst fall
- APLU −5.1%GRNB −16.4%
- Market sensitivity
- APLU 0.08GRNB 0.69
Popular comparisons
- 0.31% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.22%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.31% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.05%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.31% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.20% · 0.20%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.