BALT ranks 1st and APRW 10th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.
APRW vs BALT
BALT −0.05pt a year
0.74%0.69%
BALT 42.0×the volume
13.6K569K
APRW +0.9pt
+7.1%+6.2%
APRW vs BALT Performance
+40.9%+35.0%
- APRW 0.74%
- BALT 0.69%, better
- APRW $203M
- BALT $3.47B
- APRW +10.2%, better
- BALT +5.8%
- APRW 0.00%
- BALT
- APRW 2
- BALT 3
- APRW 13.6K sh
- BALT 569K sh, better
- APRW $37.95
- BALT $34.93
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | APRW | BALT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | B65Higher |
| Mission | A78 | |
| Risk | B64Higher | B63 |
| Tradability | A70Higher | B64 |
| Holdings | C48 | |
| Durability | B68 | A82Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
Same Category. APRW and BALT are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
APRWC
BALTB
In short
APRW The April door in AllianzIM's buffer lineup: one year of the big S&P 500 tracker ETF's price move, cushioned against the first 20% of losses and capped on the upside, with the clock resetting every April 1.
BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.
Stated mandate
APRW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return over the current one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses.
BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
APRW vs BALT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
APRW vs BALT Cost
Overpaying APRW vs BALT
$878
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
APRW 0.74%
$14,307
BALT 0.69%
$13,429
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | APRW | BALT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,319 | $1,232 | $87 |
| 20 | $5,015 | $4,697 | $318 |
| 30 | $14,307 | $13,429 | $878 |
- 0.74%APRW
- 0.69%BALT, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
- Median 0.74%
BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds
APRW 10th cheapest of 24 funds
APRW vs BALT Dividends
- APRW 0.00%
- BALT
- APRW None
- BALT None
Distribution history
APRW vs BALT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- APRW
- BALT
Risk facts
- Volatility
- APRW 4.8%BALT 2.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- APRW 1.27BALT 1.37, better
- Worst fall
- APRW −9.6%BALT −4.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- APRW 0.35BALT 0.18
Popular comparisons
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.69% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.