Skip to content

APRW vs BALT

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF

APRWCCboe

Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

BALTBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

BALT −0.05pt a year

APRW0.74%BALT0.69%

Avg volume · 30D

BALT 42.0×the volume

APRW13.6KBALT569K

5Y return · a year

APRW +0.9pt

APRW+7.1%BALT+6.2%

APRW vs BALT Performance

Nov 2, 2021 – Nov 2, 2026

+40.9%APRW+35.0%BALT

Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. APRW +40.9%. BALT +35.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%10%20%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026
Expense ratio
APRW 0.74%
BALT 0.69%, better
Fund size
APRW $203M
BALT $3.47B
1Y total return
APRW +10.2%, better
BALT +5.8%
Yield (12M)
APRW 0.00%
BALT No data
Holdings
APRW 2
BALT 3
Avg volume (30D)
APRW 13.6K sh
BALT 569K sh, better
NAV per share
APRW $37.95
BALT $34.93
52W range

ETF.net Grade

APRW: Cost 37, Risk 64, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 48, Durability 68. BALT: Cost 65, Risk 63, Mission 78, Tradability 64, Holdings not scored, Durability 82.
Pillar letters and Scores for APRW, BALT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAPRWBALT
Cost30% weightD37B65Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA78
Risk15% weightB64HigherB63
Tradability15% weightA70HigherB64
Holdings10% weightC48Not scored
Durability5% weightB68A82Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. APRW and BALT are both graded against the same 24 S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 20%⁠

Category · 24 funds
See all 24 ›

BALT ranks 1st and APRW 10th of 24 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 20% Category.

  1. Rank 1BBALTInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETFScore 65
  2. Rank 2BPSFJPacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETFScore 62
  3. Rank 9CJANWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Jan ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 10CAPRWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETFScore 52
  5. Rank 10CSEPWAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Sep ETFScore 52

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

APRWCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF

BALTBInnovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF

In short

APRW The April door in AllianzIM's buffer lineup: one year of the big S&P 500 tracker ETF's price move, cushioned against the first 20% of losses and capped on the upside, with the clock resetting every April 1.

BALT Most buffer ETFs hand you a cushion once a year. BALT rebuilds a 20% one every three months: four fresh starts against S&P 500 drawdowns. The trade-off is that the cap resets with it, and it starts low.

Stated mandate

APRW The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return over the current one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap, while buffering the first 20% of losses.

BALT The fund seeks to track the return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), subject to a cap, while buffering investors against losses. It targets a 20% buffer during each three-month outcome period and resets quarterly.

Why people hold it

  • APRW Absorbs the first 20% of the reference S&P 500 ETF's share-price decline over each one-year outcome period, running April 1 to March 31, then resetting.
  • Actively managed, but the contract is mechanical: a stated 20% buffer against one well-known reference ETF, not a manager's stock picks.
  • One month in AllianzIM's rolling series (MAYW runs the May cycle), so start dates can be laddered instead of pinned to a single entry point.
  • Running since 2020, and it lands in the upper half of a crowded field of deep 20% buffer funds on our review.
  • BALT Deep and short-dated: it targets a 20% buffer against losses in the S&P 500 ETF it references, over a three-month outcome period, then resets for the next quarter.innovatoretfs.com
  • 0.69% a year, under the typical fee in its deep-buffer group, and it has been running the quarterly reset since launching in 2021.
  • One of the larger funds doing 20% buffers on the S&P 500, and one of the strongest implementations in that peer group.

Worth knowing

  • APRW Upside is capped, and the cap is reset each April at whatever options cost then. Buffer and cap apply to the full period, so mid-period exits get neither intact.
  • 0.74% is the going rate here, not a discount: PSFM and PSFJ charge 0.49% and PBFR 0.50% for 20% buffers.
  • Modest assets and light trading versus the category's biggest names, so limit orders matter. The structure targets price outcomes, not income.
  • BALT A deep buffer over a short window buys a low ceiling. The cap is set fresh each three-month period, and it is far tighter than what annual buffer funds start with.
  • The 20% cushion is measured from the start of each outcome period. Buy mid-quarter and the buffer and cap you actually own differ from the headline terms.innovatoretfs.com
  • Cheaper 20% buffer options exist: PBFR at 0.50%, Pacer's Swan SOS Flex funds (PSFJ, PSFM) at 0.49%.

Full APRW profile⁠

Full BALT profile⁠

APRW vs BALT Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

APRW vs BALT Cost

Overpaying APRW vs BALT

$878

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • APRW 0.74%

    $14,307

  • BALT 0.69%

    $13,429

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • APRW 0.74%
  • BALT 0.69%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530APRW $14,307BALT $13,429

Year by year

YearAPRWBALTOverpaying
10$1,319$1,232$87
20$5,015$4,697$318
30$14,307$13,429$878

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%APRW
  • 0.69%BALT, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 20% funds
  • Median 0.74%

BALT 9th cheapest of 24 funds

APRW 10th cheapest of 24 funds

APRW vs BALT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026
Yield (12M)
APRW 0.00%
BALT No data
Payout (12M)
APRW None
BALT None

Distribution history

Per share, 2020, same scale for both

APRW1 paymentAll APRW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment in 2020. Dec 15, 2020 $0.70. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.502020
BALTAll BALT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

APRW vs BALT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • APRW
  • BALT
Nov 2, 2021 to Nov 2, 2026. Worst fall: APRW −9.6% · Apr 2025. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−8%−6%−4%−2%0%Nov 2021May 2024Nov 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
APRW 4.8%BALT 2.4%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
APRW 1.27BALT 1.37, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
APRW −9.6%BALT −4.9%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
APRW 0.35BALT 0.18

Popular comparisons

  • APRWCvsPSFJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFJB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (July) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • APRWCvsPSFDB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFDB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • APRWCvsPSFOB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Apr ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BALTBvsPSFOB

    Innovator Defined Wealth Shield ETF · Pacer Swan SOS Flex (October) ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.69% · 0.49%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.