Skip to content

AQWA vs CGW

Global X Clean Water ETF

AQWACNasdaq

Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF

CGWCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

AQWA −0.08pt a year

AQWA0.50%CGW0.58%

Avg volume · 30D

CGW 4.5×the volume

AQWA5.29KCGW23.6K

5Y return · a year

AQWA +0.3pt

AQWA+3.7%CGW+3.4%

AQWA vs CGW Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+19.9%AQWA+18.1%CGW

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. AQWA +19.9%. CGW +18.1%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%30%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AQWA 0.50%, better
CGW 0.58%
Fund size
AQWA $21M
CGW $1.04B
1Y total return
AQWA −3.2%
CGW +2.1%, better
Yield (12M)
AQWA 1.61%, better
CGW 1.55%
Holdings
AQWA 42
CGW 78
Avg volume (30D)
AQWA 5.29K sh
CGW 23.6K sh, better
NAV per share
AQWA $18.69
CGW $64.14
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AQWA: Cost 66, Risk 51, Mission not scored, Tradability 23, Holdings 46, Durability 21. CGW: Cost 38, Risk 69, Mission not scored, Tradability 53, Holdings 69, Durability 74.
Pillar letters and Scores for AQWA, CGW, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAQWACGW
Cost30% weightB66HigherD38
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC51B69Higher
Tradability15% weightF23C53Higher
Holdings10% weightC46B69Higher
Durability5% weightF21A74Higher

Rank among Water funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AQWA and CGW are both graded against the same 6 Water funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Water⁠

Category · 6 funds
See all 6 ›

CGW ranks 4th and AQWA 5th of 6 funds in the Water Category.

  1. Rank 1BFIWFirst Trust Water ETFScore 67
  2. Rank 2BTBLUTortoise Global Water FundScore 58
  3. Rank 3CPHOInvesco Water Resources ETFScore 54
  4. Rank 4CCGWInvesco S&P Global Water Index ETFScore 53
  5. Rank 5CAQWAGlobal X Clean Water ETFScore 48
  6. Rank 6DPIOInvesco Global Water ETFScore 33

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AQWACGlobal X Clean Water ETF

CGWCInvesco S&P Global Water Index ETF

In short

AQWA Global X's 2021 entry into water, built narrower than the old guard: roughly 40 companies worldwide working on treatment, purification, storage and distribution. The pitch is pipes and filters, not a broad utility basket.

CGW Water treated as a global trade, not a US one. CGW has tracked the S&P Global Water Index since 2007, holding roughly 70 developed-market names across the utilities and equipment makers that keep water moving.

Stated mandate

AQWA AQWA seeks to invest in companies advancing clean-water provision, including water treatment, storage and distribution infrastructure, purification, and efficiency strategies.

CGW The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the S&P Global Water Index.

Why people hold it

  • AQWA Costs 0.50% a year, on the cheaper side of the water fund field. A fee edge is fixed and known, unlike anything else about a theme fund.
  • Follows a rules-based index (Solactive Global Clean Water Industry) rather than a manager's hunches, so the water definition is written down before the money moves.globalxetfs.com
  • Mandate is global and specific: treatment, purification, storage, distribution infrastructure and efficiency, wherever those companies are listed.globalxetfs.com
  • CGW Launched in 2007, so it has carried the water theme through a full cycle of thematic booms and busts, and has grown into one of the larger funds in a small category.
  • Global by design: the mandate spans developed markets worldwide rather than US-listed water plays only, and it follows the S&P Global Water Index instead of a manager's hunches.
  • The basket does what the label says: roughly 70 water names, no unrelated filler. One of the tighter mandate fits among water funds.

Worth knowing

  • AQWA Small asset base and thin trading. Bid-ask spreads can widen, and tiny funds carry more closure risk than entrenched ones.
  • Roughly 40 stocks in one theme. A handful of names can drive the whole ride, up or down.
  • Launched 2021, so it is the newcomer against water veterans like FIW, CGW and PHO, and it sits in the lower half of our water group on the current review.
  • CGW The 0.58% fee sits right at the water group's median. TBLU charges 0.40% and FIW 0.50%, so cheaper routes into the theme exist.
  • Trades thinly next to broad-market ETFs, so spreads can widen, especially early and late in the session. Limit orders are the standard tool.
  • One theme, about 70 stocks: results can wander a long way from a broad global index in either direction. Cash also arrives once or twice a year, not monthly.

Full AQWA profile⁠

Full CGW profile⁠

AQWA vs CGW Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AQWA vs CGW Cost

Overpaying CGW vs AQWA

$1,474

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AQWA 0.50%

    $9,979

  • CGW 0.58%

    $11,453

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AQWA 0.50%
  • CGW 0.58%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.5K$5K$7.5K$10K$12.5K051015202530CGW $11,453AQWA $9,979

Year by year

YearAQWACGWOverpaying
10$900$1,041$141
20$3,460$3,986$526
30$9,979$11,453$1,474

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AQWA, cheaper
  • 0.58%CGW
  • Middle half of Water funds
  • Median 0.54%

AQWA 2nd cheapest of 6 funds

CGW 4th cheapest of 6 funds

AQWA vs CGW Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AQWA 1.61%, better
CGW 1.55%
Payout (12M)
AQWA $0.30
CGW $1.00
Last payment
AQWA $0.13
CGW $1.00
Ex-dividend
AQWA Jun 29, 2026
CGW Dec 22, 2025
Paid on
AQWA Jul 7, 2026
CGW Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
AQWA Twice a year
CGW Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AQWATwice a year · 11 paymentsAll AQWA payments⁠
One bar per payment. 11 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 29, 2021 $0.04; Dec 30, 2021 $0.17; Jun 29, 2022 $0.08; Dec 29, 2022 $0.14; Jun 29, 2023 $0.11; Dec 28, 2023 $0.14; Jun 27, 2024 $0.08; Dec 30, 2024 $0.15; Jun 27, 2025 $0.10; Dec 30, 2025 $0.17; Jun 29, 2026 $0.13. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
CGWAnnual · 9 paymentsAll CGW payments⁠
One bar per payment. 9 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2017 $0.61; Dec 24, 2018 $0.67; Dec 23, 2019 $0.61; Dec 21, 2020 $0.66; Dec 20, 2021 $0.96; Dec 19, 2022 $0.68; Dec 18, 2023 $0.82; Dec 23, 2024 $1.23; Dec 22, 2025 $1.00. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

AQWA vs CGW Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • AQWA
  • CGW
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: CGW −32.7% · Sep 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−30%−20%−10%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AQWA 15.4%CGW 14.2%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AQWA 0.51CGW 0.70, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AQWA −29.5%, betterCGW −32.7%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AQWA 0.82CGW 0.78

Popular comparisons

  • AQWACvsFIWB

    Global X Clean Water ETF · First Trust Water ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGWCvsFIWB

    Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF · First Trust Water ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AQWACvsTBLUB

    Global X Clean Water ETF · Tortoise Global Water Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGWCvsTBLUB

    Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF · Tortoise Global Water Fund

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.40%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AQWACvsPHOC

    Global X Clean Water ETF · Invesco Water Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • CGWCvsPHOC

    Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF · Invesco Water Resources ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.58% · 0.59%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.