CGW ranks 4th and AQWA 5th of 6 funds in the Water Category.
AQWA vs CGW
AQWA −0.08pt a year
0.50%0.58%
CGW 4.5×the volume
5.29K23.6K
AQWA +0.3pt
+3.7%+3.4%
AQWA vs CGW Performance
+19.9%+18.1%
- AQWA 0.50%, better
- CGW 0.58%
- AQWA $21M
- CGW $1.04B
- AQWA −3.2%
- CGW +2.1%, better
- AQWA 1.61%, better
- CGW 1.55%
- AQWA 42
- CGW 78
- AQWA 5.29K sh
- CGW 23.6K sh, better
- AQWA $18.69
- CGW $64.14
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AQWA | CGW |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51 | B69Higher |
| Tradability | F23 | C53Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | B69Higher |
| Durability | F21 | A74Higher |
Rank among Water funds
Same Category. AQWA and CGW are both graded against the same 6 Water funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AQWAC
CGWC
In short
AQWA Global X's 2021 entry into water, built narrower than the old guard: roughly 40 companies worldwide working on treatment, purification, storage and distribution. The pitch is pipes and filters, not a broad utility basket.
CGW Water treated as a global trade, not a US one. CGW has tracked the S&P Global Water Index since 2007, holding roughly 70 developed-market names across the utilities and equipment makers that keep water moving.
Stated mandate
AQWA AQWA seeks to invest in companies advancing clean-water provision, including water treatment, storage and distribution infrastructure, purification, and efficiency strategies.
CGW The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the investment results of the S&P Global Water Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AQWA vs CGW Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AQWA vs CGW Cost
Overpaying CGW vs AQWA
$1,474
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AQWA 0.50%
$9,979
CGW 0.58%
$11,453
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AQWA | CGW | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,041 | $141 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $3,986 | $526 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $11,453 | $1,474 |
- 0.50%AQWA, cheaper
- 0.58%CGW
- Middle half of Water funds
- Median 0.54%
AQWA 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
CGW 4th cheapest of 6 funds
AQWA vs CGW Dividends
- AQWA 1.61%, better
- CGW 1.55%
- AQWA $0.30
- CGW $1.00
- AQWA $0.13
- CGW $1.00
- AQWA Jun 29, 2026
- CGW Dec 22, 2025
- AQWA Jul 7, 2026
- CGW Dec 26, 2025
- AQWA Twice a year
- CGW Annual
Distribution history
AQWA vs CGW Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AQWA
- CGW
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AQWA 15.4%CGW 14.2%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AQWA 0.51CGW 0.70, better
- Worst fall
- AQWA −29.5%, betterCGW −32.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AQWA 0.82CGW 0.78
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.