PHO ranks 3rd and AQWA 5th of 6 funds in the Water Category.
AQWA vs PHO
AQWA −0.09pt a year
0.50%0.59%
PHO 14.1×the volume
5.29K74.7K
PHO +1.8pt
+3.7%+5.5%
AQWA vs PHO Performance
+19.9%+30.7%
- AQWA 0.50%, better
- PHO 0.59%
- AQWA $21M
- PHO $2.05B
- AQWA −3.2%
- PHO +3.8%, better
- AQWA 1.61%, better
- PHO 0.50%
- AQWA 42
- PHO 42
- AQWA 5.29K sh
- PHO 74.7K sh, better
- AQWA $18.69
- PHO $73.79
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AQWA | PHO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66Higher | D38 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51Higher | C50 |
| Tradability | F23 | A85Higher |
| Holdings | C46 | C54Higher |
| Durability | F21 | A77Higher |
Rank among Water funds
Same Category. AQWA and PHO are both graded against the same 6 Water funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AQWAC
PHOC
In short
AQWA Global X's 2021 entry into water, built narrower than the old guard: roughly 40 companies worldwide working on treatment, purification, storage and distribution. The pitch is pipes and filters, not a broad utility basket.
PHO The original water ETF, listed in 2005 and still on the same beat: about 40 US-listed companies that purify, pump and conserve water. Rivals roam the globe. This one stays home.
Stated mandate
AQWA AQWA seeks to invest in companies advancing clean-water provision, including water treatment, storage and distribution infrastructure, purification, and efficiency strategies.
PHO The fund seeks to track the NASDAQ OMX US Water Index, investing primarily in US-listed companies whose products are designed to conserve and purify water for homes, businesses, and industries.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AQWA vs PHO Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AQWA vs PHO Cost
Overpaying PHO vs AQWA
$1,656
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AQWA 0.50%
$9,979
PHO 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AQWA | PHO | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,058 | $158 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $4,051 | $591 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $11,635 | $1,656 |
- 0.50%AQWA, cheaper
- 0.59%PHO
- Middle half of Water funds
- Median 0.54%
AQWA 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
PHO 5th cheapest of 6 funds
AQWA vs PHO Dividends
- AQWA 1.61%, better
- PHO 0.50%
- AQWA $0.30
- PHO $0.37
- AQWA $0.13
- PHO $0.06
- AQWA Jun 29, 2026
- PHO Sep 21, 2026
- AQWA Jul 7, 2026
- PHO Sep 25, 2026
- AQWA Twice a year
- PHO Quarterly
Distribution history
AQWA vs PHO Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AQWA
- PHO
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AQWA 15.4%, betterPHO 15.8%
- Return per unit of risk
- AQWA 0.51PHO 0.62, better
- Worst fall
- AQWA −29.5%PHO −28.6%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AQWA 0.82PHO 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.40%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.