TBLU ranks 2nd and AQWA 5th of 6 funds in the Water Category.
AQWA vs TBLU
TBLU −0.10pt a year
0.50%0.40%
AQWA 2.9×the volume
5.29K1.8K
AQWA +0.5pt
+3.7%+3.2%
AQWA vs TBLU Performance
+19.9%+17.1%
- AQWA 0.50%
- TBLU 0.40%, better
- AQWA $21M
- TBLU $55M
- AQWA −3.2%
- TBLU −0.5%, better
- AQWA 1.61%
- TBLU 3.50%, better
- AQWA 42
- TBLU 61
- AQWA 5.29K sh, better
- TBLU 1.8K sh
- AQWA $18.69
- TBLU $50.92
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AQWA | TBLU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B66 | A88Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51 | B61Higher |
| Tradability | F23Higher | F21 |
| Holdings | C46Higher | D36 |
| Durability | F21 | C42Higher |
Rank among Water funds
Same Category. AQWA and TBLU are both graded against the same 6 Water funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AQWAC
TBLUB
In short
AQWA Global X's 2021 entry into water, built narrower than the old guard: roughly 40 companies worldwide working on treatment, purification, storage and distribution. The pitch is pipes and filters, not a broad utility basket.
TBLU Tortoise didn't license a water benchmark, it built one. TBLU tracks its own global water index, ESG screened, for 0.40% a year.
Stated mandate
AQWA AQWA seeks to invest in companies advancing clean-water provision, including water treatment, storage and distribution infrastructure, purification, and efficiency strategies.
TBLU The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the total-return performance of the Tortoise Global Water Net Total Return Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AQWA vs TBLU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AQWA vs TBLU Cost
Overpaying AQWA vs TBLU
$1,889
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AQWA 0.50%
$9,979
TBLU 0.40%
$8,090
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AQWA | TBLU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $723 | $177 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $2,793 | $667 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $8,090 | $1,889 |
- 0.50%AQWA
- 0.40%TBLU, cheaper
- Middle half of Water funds
- Median 0.54%
TBLU cheapest of 6 funds
AQWA 2nd cheapest of 6 funds
AQWA vs TBLU Dividends
- AQWA 1.61%
- TBLU 3.50%, better
- AQWA $0.30
- TBLU $1.78
- AQWA $0.13
- TBLU $0.50
- AQWA Jun 29, 2026
- TBLU Jun 25, 2026
- AQWA Jul 7, 2026
- TBLU Jun 26, 2026
- AQWA Twice a year
- TBLU Twice a year
Distribution history
AQWA vs TBLU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AQWA
- TBLU
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AQWA 15.4%TBLU 15.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AQWA 0.51TBLU 0.62, better
- Worst fall
- AQWA −29.5%, betterTBLU −35.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AQWA 0.82TBLU 0.92
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.59%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.40% · 0.58%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.