PANG ranks 3rd and ARCX 261st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ARCX vs PANG
PANG −0.54pt a year
1.30%0.76%
PANG 1.02×the volume
43.8K44.6K
ARCX vs PANG Performance
−92.6%+91.6%
- ARCX 1.30%
- PANG 0.76%, better
- ARCX $5M
- PANG $9M
- ARCX −92.6%
- PANG +91.6%, better
- ARCX 2
- PANG 4
- ARCX 43.8K sh
- PANG 44.6K sh, better
- ARCX $6.67
- PANG $31.31
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARCX | PANG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A93 | A94Higher |
| Risk | D30 | A74Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B57 | B59Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ARCX and PANG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARCXD
PANGA
In short
ARCX Geared exposure to one story stock: ARCX aims for two times Archer Aviation's daily move, in a plain brokerage account. Built for a single trading day, not a long-haul air-taxi bet.
PANG Palo Alto Networks, doubled. PANG aims for 200% of PANW's daily move, reset every day, and it reached the market days before the only other 2x PANW fund. Flat 0.76% fee, no waiver attached.
Stated mandate
ARCX The fund seeks daily results equal to two times the daily performance of Archer Aviation Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single trading day rather than longer holding periods.
PANG The ETF seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, equal to 200% of the daily performance of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. stock.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARCX vs PANG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARCX vs PANG Cost
Overpaying ARCX vs PANG
$8,713
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARCX 1.30%
$23,369
PANG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARCX | PANG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,263 | $1,353 | $910 |
| 20 | $8,393 | $5,142 | $3,251 |
| 30 | $23,369 | $14,656 | $8,713 |
- 1.30%ARCX
- 0.76%PANG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
PANG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
ARCX 229th cheapest of 315 funds
ARCX vs PANG Dividends
- ARCX None
- PANG
- ARCX
- PANG $1.30
- ARCX
- PANG Dec 30, 2025
- ARCX
- PANG Jan 2, 2026
- ARCX
- PANG Irregular
Distribution history
ARCX vs PANG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARCX 108.4%PANG 128.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARCX −1.21PANG 0.90
- Worst fall
- ARCX −96.5%PANG −62.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ARCX 5.89PANG 3.32
Popular comparisons
- 1.30% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.