TSMG ranks 1st and ARCX 261st of 315 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ARCX vs TSMG
TSMG −0.54pt a year
1.30%0.76%
TSMG 1.6×the volume
43.8K69K
ARCX vs TSMG Performance
−92.6%+40.8%
- ARCX 1.30%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- ARCX $5M
- TSMG $28M
- ARCX −92.6%
- TSMG +40.8%, better
- ARCX 2
- TSMG 5
- ARCX 43.8K sh
- TSMG 69K sh, better
- ARCX $6.67
- TSMG $33.77
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARCX | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D32 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A93Higher | A79 |
| Risk | D30 | A84Higher |
| Tradability | C40 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B57 | B67Higher |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ARCX and TSMG are both graded against the same 315 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARCXD
TSMGA
In short
ARCX Geared exposure to one story stock: ARCX aims for two times Archer Aviation's daily move, in a plain brokerage account. Built for a single trading day, not a long-haul air-taxi bet.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
ARCX The fund seeks daily results equal to two times the daily performance of Archer Aviation Inc. common shares, before fees and expenses. It is designed for a single trading day rather than longer holding periods.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARCX vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARCX vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying ARCX vs TSMG
$8,713
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARCX 1.30%
$23,369
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARCX | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $2,263 | $1,353 | $910 |
| 20 | $8,393 | $5,142 | $3,251 |
| 30 | $23,369 | $14,656 | $8,713 |
- 1.30%ARCX
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 315 funds
ARCX 229th cheapest of 315 funds
ARCX vs TSMG Dividends
- ARCX None
- TSMG
- ARCX
- TSMG $2.73
- ARCX
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- ARCX
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- ARCX
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
ARCX vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARCX 108.4%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARCX −1.21TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- ARCX −96.5%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ARCX 5.89TSMG 3.81
Popular comparisons
- 1.30% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.30% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.