IBOT ranks 1st and ARKQ 10th of 18 funds in the Robotics & Automation Category.
ARKQ vs IBOT
IBOT −0.28pt a year
0.75%0.47%
ARKQ 7.8×the volume
112K14.4K
ARKQ +7.7pt
+33.3%+25.6%
ARKQ vs IBOT Performance
−10.3%+17.9%
- ARKQ 0.75%
- IBOT 0.47%, better
- ARKQ $1.89B
- IBOT $99M
- ARKQ −10.3%
- IBOT +17.9%, better
- ARKQ 0.28%
- IBOT 0.32%, better
- ARKQ 37
- IBOT 69
- ARKQ 112K sh, better
- IBOT 14.4K sh
- ARKQ $111.05
- IBOT $62.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARKQ | IBOT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | F18 | A85Higher |
| Mission | A76 | |
| Risk | C46 | A79Higher |
| Tradability | A96Higher | B67 |
| Holdings | C51 | A74Higher |
| Durability | A85Higher | B67 |
Rank among Robotics & Automation funds
Same Category. ARKQ and IBOT are both graded against the same 18 Robotics & Automation funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARKQC
IBOTA
In short
ARKQ ARK's autonomy bet, running since 2014: about 40 hand-picked stocks in robotics and autonomous tech, no index in sight. ARK posts holdings daily and emails its trades, so you can see exactly what changed and when.
IBOT A straight robotics play. IBOT tracks the BlueStar Robotics Index across about 70 companies tied to robotics, rather than a broad basket of tech "disruptors", and charges well under the typical fee in its niche.
Stated mandate
ARKQ The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital.
IBOT The fund seeks to track the BlueStar Robotics Index as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, while following companies involved in robotics.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARKQ vs IBOT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARKQ vs IBOT Cost
Overpaying ARKQ vs IBOT
$5,064
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARKQ 0.75%
$14,482
IBOT 0.47%
$9,418
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARKQ | IBOT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,336 | $847 | $489 |
| 20 | $5,078 | $3,261 | $1,817 |
| 30 | $14,482 | $9,418 | $5,064 |
- 0.75%ARKQ
- 0.47%IBOT, cheaper
- Middle half of Robotics & Automation funds
- Median 0.54%
IBOT 4th cheapest of 18 funds
ARKQ 14th cheapest of 18 funds
ARKQ vs IBOT Dividends
- ARKQ 0.28%
- IBOT 0.32%, better
- ARKQ $0.31
- IBOT $0.20
- ARKQ $0.31
- IBOT $0.20
- ARKQ Dec 26, 2025
- IBOT Dec 22, 2025
- ARKQ Dec 29, 2025
- IBOT Dec 26, 2025
- ARKQ Irregular
- IBOT Annual
Distribution history
ARKQ vs IBOT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARKQ 30.8%IBOT 20.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- ARKQ 0.95IBOT 1.01, better
- Worst fall
- ARKQ −55.7%IBOT −25.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ARKQ 1.80IBOT 1.40
ARKQ and IBOT in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.75% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.47% · 0.45%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.


