Skip to content
etf.net

ARKT vs EMAU

ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF

ARKTFCboe

Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series

EMAUCCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

EMAU −1.14pt a year

ARKT1.44%EMAU0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

EMAU 1.2×the volume

ARKT257EMAU313

ARKT vs EMAU Performance

Sep 30, 2026 – Oct 30, 2026

−5.3%ARKT−6.0%EMAU

Sep 30, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026. ARKT −5.3%. EMAU −6.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−4%−2%0%2%Sep 30Oct 15Oct 30
Expense ratio
ARKT 1.44%
EMAU 0.30%, better
Fund size
ARKT $2M
EMAU $1M
1Y total return
ARKT −7.9%
EMAU No data
Holdings
ARKT 4
EMAU 4
Avg volume (30D)
ARKT 257 sh
EMAU 313 sh, better
NAV per share
ARKT $18.83
EMAU $24.10
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ARKT: Cost 0, Risk 29, Mission not scored, Tradability 20, Holdings 44, Durability 34. EMAU: Cost 90, Risk 36, Mission not scored, Tradability 7, Holdings not scored, Durability 5.
Pillar letters and Scores for ARKT, EMAU, with each pillar’s weight
PillarARKTEMAU
Cost30% weightF0A90Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightD29D36Higher
Tradability15% weightF20HigherF7
Holdings10% weightC44Not scored
Durability5% weightD34HigherF5

Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ARKT and EMAU are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Buffer⁠

Category · 14 funds
See all 14 ›

EMAU ranks 9th and ARKT 14th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.

  1. Rank 8CBUFEFT Vest Laddered Emerging Markets Buffer ETFScore 42
  2. Rank 9CEMAUCorgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August SeriesScore 40
  3. Rank 9CEMJLCorgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  4. Rank 13DTJUNFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - JuneScore 35
  5. Rank 14FARKTARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETFScore 14

ARKT vs EMAU Holdings

How ARKT and EMAU differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ARKT and 0.0% of EMAU.

Level by level

  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile2.3%
  • Sector11 Sectors63.2%
  • Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in ARKT and EMAU, widest gap first
SectorMore in ARKTMore in EMAU
Health CareARKT +27.2 points
TechnologyEMAU +14.9 points
MaterialsEMAU +5.8 points
IndustrialsARKT +5.6 points
FinancialsEMAU +4.4 points
Consumer DiscretionaryARKT +4.0 points
EnergyEMAU +3.9 points
Consumer StaplesEMAU +2.7 points
CommunicationEMAU +2.1 points
UtilitiesEMAU +2.0 points
Real EstateEMAU +1.0 points

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ARKT and EMAU, widest gap first
CountryMore in ARKTMore in EMAU
United StatesARKT +89.7 points
TaiwanEMAU +29.4 points
South KoreaEMAU +20.2 points
ChinaEMAU +19.9 points
IndiaEMAU +12.1 points
SwitzerlandARKT +4.7 points
BrazilEMAU +4.2 points
South AfricaEMAU +3.7 points
Other countries (12)EMAU +4.7 points

Outside the US: EMAU 1% developed, 99% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ARKT113.3%
  • EMAU105.1%

Securities held

  • ARKT4
  • EMAU3

Asset class

ARKT
Equity
EMAU
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in ARKT4
  • In both0
  • Only in EMAU3

Only in ARKT

4 securities, 100% of ARKT by weight

  • Ark Innovation Etf97.32%
  • 4ARKK Us 09/30/27 P89.17.34%
  • 4ARKK Us 09/30/27 C93.567.30%

Only in EMAU

3 securities, 100% of EMAU by weight

  • Eem 07/30/2027 12.86 C76.88%
  • United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.75% 07/31/202715.31%
  • Eem 07/30/2027 64.32 P10.46%

Weight gaps

ARKT and EMAU share no securities.

All ARKT holdings⁠All EMAU holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARKT vs EMAU Cost

Overpaying ARKT vs EMAU

$19,277

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ARKT 1.44%

    $25,426

  • EMAU 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ARKT 1.44%
  • EMAU 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530ARKT $25,426EMAU $6,149

Year by year

YearARKTEMAUOverpaying
10$2,493$545$1,948
20$9,186$2,113$7,073
30$25,426$6,149$19,277

Expense ratio

  • 1.44%ARKT
  • 0.30%EMAU, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
  • Median 0.89%

EMAU cheapest of 14 funds

ARKT 14th cheapest of 14 funds

ARKT vs EMAU Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
ARKT No data
EMAU None
Last payment
ARKT $0.05
EMAU No data
Ex-dividend
ARKT Dec 26, 2025
EMAU No data
Frequency
ARKT Irregular
EMAU No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ARKTIrregular · 1 paymentAll ARKT payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 26, 2025 $0.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.052026YTD
EMAUAll EMAU payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ARKT vs EMAU Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ARKT 16.3%since Nov 2025EMAU No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ARKT −0.66since Nov 2025EMAU No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ARKT −18.8%since Oct 2025EMAU No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ARKT 0.77EMAU 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • ARKTFvsEBUFB

    ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EMAUCvsEBUFB

    Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKTFvsEJANB

    ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EMAUCvsEJANB

    Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • ARKTFvsEOCTB

    ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.44% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • EMAUCvsEOCTB

    Corgi Emerging Markets Equities 15% Structured Buffer ETF - August Series · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.89%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.