ARKT vs EOCT: Grades, Fees and Holdings Compared

ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF

ARKTFCboe

Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

EOCTBNYSE Arca

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

EOCT −0.55pt a year

ARKT1.44%EOCT0.89%

Avg volume · 30D

EOCT 56.9×the volume

ARKT257EOCT14.6K

ARKT vs EOCT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Nov 2, 2026

−8.9%ARKT+7.7%EOCT

Expense ratio: ARKT 1.44%; EOCT 0.89%, better
Fund size: ARKT $2M; EOCT $125M
1Y total return: ARKT −8.9%; EOCT +7.7%, better
Holdings: ARKT 4; EOCT 3
Avg volume (30D): ARKT 257 sh; EOCT 14.6K sh, better
NAV per share: ARKT $18.83; EOCT $33.43
52W range

ETF.net Grade

Pillar letters and Scores for ARKT, EOCT, with each pillar’s weight
Pillar	ARKT	EOCT
Cost30% weight	F0	C47Higher
Mission25% weight	Not scored	A91
Risk15% weight	D29	A73Higher
Tradability15% weight	F20	A76Higher
Holdings10% weight	C44	Not scored
Durability5% weight	D35	A80Higher

Rank among Emerging Markets Buffer funds

How we build Categories ›

Same Category. ARKT and EOCT are both graded against the same 14 Emerging Markets Buffer funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Emerging Markets Buffer⁠

Category · 14 funds

See all 14 ›

EOCT ranks 1st and ARKT 14th of 14 funds in the Emerging Markets Buffer Category.

Rank 1BEBUFInnovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETFScore 62
Rank 1BEOCTInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETFScore 62
Rank 3BEJANInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - JanuaryScore 61
Rank 13DTJUNFT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - JuneScore 35
Rank 14FARKTARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETFScore 14

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ARKTFARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF

EOCTBInnovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF

In short

ARKT No data

EOCT Buffer ETFs mostly babysit the S&P 500. EOCT aims the same machinery at emerging markets: upside in the iShares MSCI EM ETF up to a cap, with the first 15% of a drop absorbed, then a reset every October.

Stated mandate

ARKT No data

EOCT The fund seeks capped exposure to the iShares MSCI EM ETF while protecting against the first 15% of losses during each approximately annual outcome period. It resets at the end of each period and may be held indefinitely.

Why people hold it

ARKT No data

EOCT Downside buffer where it is rare. Defined-outcome funds cluster around US large caps; this one applies a 15% buffer to emerging market stocks via the iShares MSCI EM ETF.innovatoretfs.com
The rules are fixed, not discretionary: 15% of losses absorbed and upside capped over each roughly one-year period, which resets on October 1. No manager judgment calls mid-period.innovatoretfs.com
October is one rung of a ladder. Innovator runs the same emerging markets buffer on January, April and July start dates (EJAN, EAPR, EJUL), so entry points can be staggered.innovatoretfs.com innovatoretfs.com 2
At 0.89%, the fee sits right at the middle of the buffer-ETF pack, not at the expensive end.

Worth knowing

ARKT No data

EOCT Protection is rented, not free: the cap is reset each October off option prices at that moment. Emerging market swings can be violent, and the buffer sits before fees.innovatoretfs.com
It tracks the reference ETF's price move, so emerging market dividends are not passed through. The fund has not been paying distributions.
Small and lightly traded, and buying mid-period means your own buffer and cap differ from the headline numbers. Limit orders and a look at the issuer's daily figures help.innovatoretfs.com

Full ARKT profile⁠

Full EOCT profile⁠

ARKT vs EOCT Holdings

How ARKT and EOCT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ARKT and 0.0% of EOCT.

Level by level

Holdings0 in both0.0%
Countryby domicile2.3%
Sector11 Sectors63.0%
Asset classEquity100%

Sector

Sector weights in ARKT and EOCT, widest gap first
Sector	More in ARKTMore in EOCT	ARKT	EOCT
Health Care	ARKT +27.3 points	30.1%	2.8%
Technology	EOCT +17.5 points	26.7%	44.2%
Materials	EOCT +5.7 points	0.0%	5.7%
Industrials	ARKT +5.5 points	11.5%	6.0%
Consumer Discretionary	ARKT +4.3 points	11.8%	7.5%
Energy	EOCT +3.5 points	0.0%	3.5%
Financials	EOCT +3.2 points	16.0%	19.2%
Consumer Staples	EOCT +2.4 points	0.0%	2.4%
Communication	EOCT +2.0 points	3.9%	5.9%
Utilities	EOCT +1.8 points	0.0%	1.8%
Real Estate	EOCT +0.9 points	0.0%	0.9%

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ARKT and EOCT, widest gap first
Country	More in ARKTMore in EOCT	ARKT	EOCT
United States	ARKT +89.7 points	90.9%	1.2%
Taiwan	EOCT +29.4 points	1.1%	30.5%
South Korea	EOCT +20.2 points	0.0%	20.2%
China	EOCT +19.9 points	0.0%	19.9%
India	EOCT +12.1 points	0.0%	12.1%
Switzerland	ARKT +4.7 points	4.7%	0.0%
Brazil	EOCT +4.2 points	0.0%	4.2%
South Africa	EOCT +3.7 points	0.0%	3.7%
Other countries (12)	EOCT +4.7 points	3.4%	8.1%

Outside the US: EOCT 1% developed, 99% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

ARKT111.2%
EOCT108.4%

Securities held

ARKT4
EOCT3

Asset class

ARKT: Equity
EOCT: Equity

Holdings

Only in ARKT4
In both0
Only in EOCT3

Only in ARKT

4 securities, 100% of ARKT by weight

Ark Innovation Etf94.89%
4ARKK Us 09/30/27 P89.18.84%
4ARKK Us 09/30/27 C93.566.08%
Goldman Fs Trsy Oblig Inst 4681.43%

Only in EOCT

3 securities, 100% of EOCT by weight

Eem 09/30/2027 0.67 C94.68%
Eem 09/30/2027 66.79 P12.81%
Us Bank Mmda - Usbgfs 9 09/01/20370.93%

Weight gaps

ARKT and EOCT share no securities.

All ARKT holdings⁠All 6 EOCT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ARKT vs EOCT Cost

Overpaying ARKT vs EOCT

$8,554

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

ARKT 1.44%
$25,426
EOCT 0.89%
$16,872

Amount$10,000

Years30 years

Cost over time

ARKT 1.44%
EOCT 0.89%
Overpaying

Year by year

Year	ARKT	EOCT	Overpaying
10	$2,493	$1,576	$917
20	$9,186	$5,953	$3,233
30	$25,426	$16,872	$8,554

Expense ratio

1.44%ARKT
0.89%EOCT, cheaper

EOCT0.89%ARKT1.44%

0.30%1.44%

Middle half of Emerging Markets Buffer funds
Median 0.89%

EOCT 5th cheapest of 14 funds

ARKT 14th cheapest of 14 funds

ARKT vs EOCT Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 2, 2026

Payout (12M): ARKT No data; EOCT None
Last payment: ARKT $0.05; EOCT No data
Ex-dividend: ARKT Dec 26, 2025; EOCT No data
Frequency: ARKT Irregular; EOCT No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ARKTIrregular · 1 paymentAll ARKT payments⁠

EOCTAll EOCT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

ARKT vs EOCT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years: ARKT 16.3%since Nov 2025EOCT 8.5%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years: ARKT −0.66since Nov 2025EOCT 1.18
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years: ARKT −18.8%since Oct 2025EOCT −20.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years: ARKT 0.77EOCT 0.46; Market = 1

Popular comparisons

ARKTFvsEBUFB
ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
1.44% · 0.89%
Category
EOCTBvsEBUFB
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.89% · 0.89%
Category
ARKTFvsEJANB
ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January
Expense ratio
1.44% · 0.89%
Category
EOCTBvsEJANB
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - January
Expense ratio
0.89% · 0.89%
Category
ARKTFvsEJULB
ARK DIET Q4 Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
1.44% · 0.89%
Category
EOCTBvsEJULB
Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF · Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF
Expense ratio
0.89% · 0.89%
Category