TSMG ranks 2nd and ARMW 42nd of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ARMW vs TSMG
TSMG −0.24pt a year
1.00%0.76%
ARMW 1.1×the volume
73.3K68.1K
ARMW vs TSMG Performance
+12.9%+40.3%
- ARMW 1.00%
- TSMG 0.76%, better
- ARMW $23M
- TSMG $24M
- ARMW +12.9%
- TSMG +40.3%, better
- ARMW 135.21%
- TSMG
- ARMW 4
- TSMG 6
- ARMW 73.3K sh, better
- TSMG 68.1K sh
- ARMW $22.93
- TSMG $28.23
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARMW | TSMG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | A70Higher |
| Mission | A89Higher | A75 |
| Risk | A73 | A82Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | A76Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | A70Higher | B66 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ARMW and TSMG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARMWB
TSMGA
In short
ARMW No sold calls here. ARMW uses swaps to target 1.2x Arm Holdings' calendar-week total return and pays shareholders every week, resetting its exposure at the final close of each week. Fee: 1.00%, with no waiver.
TSMG Two times TSM, one day at a time. TSMG aims for 200% of Taiwan Semiconductor's daily move, no margin account required, at 0.75% a year, below what most leveraged single-stock funds charge.
Stated mandate
ARMW The fund seeks weekly shareholder distributions and, as a secondary objective, calendar-week returns before fees and expenses equal to 1.2 times Arm Holdings plc common shares' calendar-week total return.
TSMG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARMW vs TSMG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARMW vs TSMG Cost
Overpaying ARMW vs TSMG
$4,032
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARMW 1.00%
$18,688
TSMG 0.76%
$14,656
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARMW | TSMG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,353 | $410 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $5,142 | $1,483 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $14,656 | $4,032 |
- 1.00%ARMW
- 0.76%TSMG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
TSMG 131st cheapest of 312 funds
ARMW 196th cheapest of 312 funds
ARMW vs TSMG Dividends
- ARMW 135.21%
- TSMG
- ARMW $33.07
- TSMG
- ARMW $0.35
- TSMG $2.73
- ARMW Nov 9, 2026
- TSMG Dec 30, 2025
- ARMW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- TSMG Jan 2, 2026
- ARMW Weekly
- TSMG Irregular
Distribution history
ARMW vs TSMG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARMW 123.8%TSMG 77.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARMW 0.56TSMG 0.97
- Worst fall
- ARMW −70.2%TSMG −63.7%
- Market sensitivity
- ARMW 4.28TSMG 3.98
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.76% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.