UNHG ranks 1st and ARMW 42nd of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ARMW vs UNHG
UNHG −0.23pt a year
1.00%0.77%
UNHG 10.2×the volume
73.3K744K
ARMW vs UNHG Performance
+12.9%+18.8%
- ARMW 1.00%
- UNHG 0.77%, better
- ARMW $23M
- UNHG $73M
- ARMW +12.9%
- UNHG +18.8%, better
- ARMW 135.21%
- UNHG
- ARMW 4
- UNHG 6
- ARMW 73.3K sh
- UNHG 744K sh, better
- ARMW $22.93
- UNHG $19.20
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARMW | UNHG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | B61Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A91Higher |
| Risk | A73 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | A91Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | A70Higher | B67 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ARMW and UNHG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARMWB
UNHGA
In short
ARMW No sold calls here. ARMW uses swaps to target 1.2x Arm Holdings' calendar-week total return and pays shareholders every week, resetting its exposure at the final close of each week. Fee: 1.00%, with no waiver.
UNHG Two times UnitedHealth's daily move, reset every night: a managed-care insurer in a category stuffed with chip and AI names. UNHG got there first, and it charges 0.77%.
Stated mandate
ARMW The fund seeks weekly shareholder distributions and, as a secondary objective, calendar-week returns before fees and expenses equal to 1.2 times Arm Holdings plc common shares' calendar-week total return.
UNHG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to twice the daily performance of UnitedHealth Group Incorporated stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARMW vs UNHG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARMW vs UNHG Cost
Overpaying ARMW vs UNHG
$3,859
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARMW 1.00%
$18,688
UNHG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARMW | UNHG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,371 | $392 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $5,205 | $1,420 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $14,829 | $3,859 |
- 1.00%ARMW
- 0.77%UNHG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
UNHG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
ARMW 196th cheapest of 312 funds
ARMW vs UNHG Dividends
- ARMW 135.21%
- UNHG
- ARMW $33.07
- UNHG
- ARMW $0.35
- UNHG $1.90
- ARMW Nov 9, 2026
- UNHG Dec 30, 2025
- ARMW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- UNHG Jan 2, 2026
- ARMW Weekly
- UNHG Irregular
Distribution history
ARMW vs UNHG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARMW 123.8%UNHG 98.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARMW 0.56UNHG 0.90
- Worst fall
- ARMW −70.2%UNHG −57.1%
- Market sensitivity
- ARMW 4.28UNHG 5.19
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.