COTG ranks 3rd and ARMW 42nd of 312 funds in the Single-Stock Long Leveraged Category.
ARMW vs COTG
COTG −0.23pt a year
1.00%0.77%
COTG 1.3×the volume
73.3K97.2K
ARMW vs COTG Performance
+12.9%+16.3%
- ARMW 1.00%
- COTG 0.77%, better
- ARMW $23M
- COTG $9M
- ARMW +12.9%
- COTG +16.3%, better
- ARMW 135.21%
- COTG
- ARMW 4
- COTG 4
- ARMW 73.3K sh
- COTG 97.2K sh, better
- ARMW $22.93
- COTG $15.32
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ARMW | COTG |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C50 | B61Higher |
| Mission | A89 | A95Higher |
| Risk | A73 | A86Higher |
| Tradability | B64 | A77Higher |
| Holdings | C52 | |
| Durability | A70Higher | B56 |
Rank among Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
Same Category. ARMW and COTG are both graded against the same 312 Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ARMWB
COTGA
In short
ARMW No sold calls here. ARMW uses swaps to target 1.2x Arm Holdings' calendar-week total return and pays shareholders every week, resetting its exposure at the final close of each week. Fee: 1.00%, with no waiver.
COTG Most single-stock leverage chases chips and crypto. COTG points it at a warehouse club, aiming to deliver 200% of Costco's daily move before fees, and resetting the clock every session.
Stated mandate
ARMW The fund seeks weekly shareholder distributions and, as a secondary objective, calendar-week returns before fees and expenses equal to 1.2 times Arm Holdings plc common shares' calendar-week total return.
COTG The fund seeks daily investment results equal to 200% of the daily performance of Costco Wholesale Corporation stock, before fees and expenses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ARMW vs COTG Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ARMW vs COTG Cost
Overpaying ARMW vs COTG
$3,859
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ARMW 1.00%
$18,688
COTG 0.77%
$14,829
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ARMW | COTG | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,763 | $1,371 | $392 |
| 20 | $6,625 | $5,205 | $1,420 |
| 30 | $18,688 | $14,829 | $3,859 |
- 1.00%ARMW
- 0.77%COTG, cheaper
- Middle half of Single-Stock Long Leveraged funds
- Median 0.97%
COTG 135th cheapest of 312 funds
ARMW 196th cheapest of 312 funds
ARMW vs COTG Dividends
- ARMW 135.21%
- COTG
- ARMW $33.07
- COTG None
- ARMW $0.35
- COTG
- ARMW Nov 9, 2026
- COTG
- ARMW Pays Nov 10, 2026
- COTG
- ARMW Weekly
- COTG
Distribution history
ARMW vs COTG Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ARMW 123.8%COTG 38.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- ARMW 0.56COTG 0.12
- Worst fall
- ARMW −70.2%COTG −36.4%
- Market sensitivity
- ARMW 4.28COTG −0.04
ARMW and COTG in the news
Popular comparisons
- 1.00% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.77%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.76%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.00% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.77% · 0.75%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
