BKEM ranks 3rd and ASEA 16th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
ASEA vs BKEM
BKEM −0.54pt a year
0.65%0.11%
ASEA 1.6×the volume
24.2K15.4K
ASEA +3.4pt
+9.7%+6.3%
ASEA vs BKEM Performance
+58.8%+35.8%
- ASEA 0.65%
- BKEM 0.11%, better
- ASEA $93M
- BKEM $101M
- ASEA +16.6%, better
- BKEM +12.7%
- ASEA 3.91%, better
- BKEM 1.25%
- ASEA 43
- BKEM 1805
- ASEA 24.2K sh, better
- BKEM 15.4K sh
- ASEA $19.93
- BKEM $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASEA | BKEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A95Higher |
| Mission | C41 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A76Higher | B61 |
| Tradability | B56Higher | F23 |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | B60Higher | C48 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. ASEA and BKEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASEAC
BKEMA
In short
ASEA Southeast Asia in one ticket. ASEA tracks the FTSE/ASEAN 40, a basket of roughly 40 of the region's largest listed companies, and has run that same mandate since 2011. A narrow regional slice, not a broad emerging-markets fund.
BKEM The whole emerging world, priced like an afterthought. BNY Mellon charges 0.11% to hold well over a thousand large- and mid-cap stocks across developing markets. Broad, cheap, and very quiet.
Stated mandate
ASEA The fund seeks to track generally the price and yield performance of the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, before fees and expenses.
BKEM The fund is designed to follow the performance of an emerging-markets large- and mid-cap equity index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASEA vs BKEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASEA vs BKEM Cost
Overpaying ASEA vs BKEM
$10,404
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASEA 0.65%
$12,717
BKEM 0.11%
$2,313
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASEA | BKEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $201 | $962 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $788 | $3,652 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $2,313 | $10,404 |
- 0.65%ASEA
- 0.11%BKEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
BKEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
ASEA 14th cheapest of 20 funds
ASEA vs BKEM Dividends
- ASEA 3.91%, better
- BKEM 1.25%
- ASEA $0.78
- BKEM $0.35
- ASEA $0.41
- BKEM $0.28
- ASEA Jun 29, 2026
- BKEM Jul 1, 2026
- ASEA Jul 7, 2026
- BKEM Jul 7, 2026
- ASEA Twice a year
- BKEM Twice a year
Distribution history
ASEA vs BKEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ASEA
- BKEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASEA 12.1%, betterBKEM 16.2%
- Return per unit of risk
- ASEA 0.98BKEM 0.98Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Worst fall
- ASEA −22.2%, betterBKEM −31.9%
- Market sensitivity
- ASEA 0.62BKEM 1.12
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.16%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.11% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.