XCEM ranks 2nd and ASEA 16th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Stocks Category.
ASEA vs XCEM
XCEM −0.49pt a year
0.65%0.16%
XCEM 6.7×the volume
24.2K162K
XCEM +2.5pt
+7.3%+9.8%
ASEA vs XCEM Performance
+58.8%+61.9%
- ASEA 0.65%
- XCEM 0.16%, better
- ASEA $93M
- XCEM $2.01B
- ASEA +16.6%
- XCEM +24.3%, better
- ASEA 3.91%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- ASEA 43
- XCEM 465
- ASEA 24.2K sh
- XCEM 162K sh, better
- ASEA $19.93
- XCEM $46.99
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | ASEA | XCEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D33 | A90Higher |
| Mission | C41 | A100Higher |
| Risk | A76Higher | C51 |
| Tradability | B56 | B62Higher |
| Holdings | B60 | |
| Durability | B60 | A78Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Stocks funds
Same Category. ASEA and XCEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Stocks funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
ASEAC
XCEMA
In short
ASEA Southeast Asia in one ticket. ASEA tracks the FTSE/ASEAN 40, a basket of roughly 40 of the region's largest listed companies, and has run that same mandate since 2011. A narrow regional slice, not a broad emerging-markets fund.
XCEM The original ex-China emerging markets fund. Columbia launched XCEM in 2015, back when carving China out of an EM sleeve was a fringe idea rather than a crowded shelf. Roughly 150 EM stocks, no China, 0.16% a year.
Stated mandate
ASEA The fund seeks to track generally the price and yield performance of the FTSE/ASEAN 40 Index, before fees and expenses.
XCEM The fund seeks investment results that correspond to the performance of the EGAI Emerging Markets ex-China Index before fees and expenses. It generally invests at least 80% of net assets in index companies and seeks to replicate the index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
ASEA vs XCEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
ASEA vs XCEM Cost
Overpaying ASEA vs XCEM
$9,375
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
ASEA 0.65%
$12,717
XCEM 0.16%
$3,342
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | ASEA | XCEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,163 | $292 | $871 |
| 20 | $4,440 | $1,141 | $3,299 |
| 30 | $12,717 | $3,342 | $9,375 |
- 0.65%ASEA
- 0.16%XCEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Stocks funds
- Median 0.45%
XCEM 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
ASEA 14th cheapest of 20 funds
ASEA vs XCEM Dividends
- ASEA 3.91%, better
- XCEM 2.68%
- ASEA $0.78
- XCEM $1.25
- ASEA $0.41
- XCEM $1.25
- ASEA Jun 29, 2026
- XCEM Dec 18, 2025
- ASEA Jul 7, 2026
- XCEM Dec 26, 2025
- ASEA Twice a year
- XCEM Annual
Distribution history
ASEA vs XCEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- ASEA
- XCEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- ASEA 12.1%, betterXCEM 20.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- ASEA 0.98, betterXCEM 0.95
- Worst fall
- ASEA −22.2%, betterXCEM −29.5%
- Market sensitivity
- ASEA 0.62XCEM 1.27
ASEA and XCEM in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.65% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.07%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.11%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.65% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.16% · 0.32%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

