Skip to content

ASGM vs HBDC

Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF

ASGMCNYSE Arca

Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF

HBDCANasdaq

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

HBDC −0.47pt a year

ASGM0.86%HBDC0.39%

Avg volume · 30D

HBDC 6.4×the volume

ASGM1.23KHBDC7.84K

ASGM vs HBDC Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+23.3%ASGM+2.0%HBDC

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ASGM +23.3%. HBDC +2.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ASGM 0.86%
HBDC 0.39%, better
Fund size
ASGM $11M
HBDC $90M
1Y total return
ASGM +23.3%, better
HBDC +2.0%
Yield (12M)
ASGM No data
HBDC 5.15%
Holdings
ASGM 17
HBDC 156
Avg volume (30D)
ASGM 1.23K sh
HBDC 7.84K sh, better
NAV per share
ASGM $33.05
HBDC $24.37
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ASGM: Cost 83, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 9, Holdings not scored, Durability 20. HBDC: Cost 100, Risk 63, Mission not scored, Tradability 48, Holdings 86, Durability 49.
Pillar letters and Scores for ASGM, HBDC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarASGMHBDC
Cost30% weightA83A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53B63Higher
Tradability15% weightF9C48Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredA86
Durability5% weightF20C49Higher

Rank among Alternative Strategies funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ASGM and HBDC are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Alternative Strategies⁠

Category · 29 funds
See all 29 ›

HBDC ranks 2nd and ASGM 14th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2AHBDCHilton BDC Corporate Bond ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 2AQAINYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 13BEDGH3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETFScore 55
  5. Rank 14CASGMVirtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETFScore 54
  6. Rank 15CEVNTAltShares Event-Driven ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ASGMCVirtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF

HBDCAHilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF

In short

ASGM No data

HBDC Private credit's lenders have to borrow too. HBDC owns the senior unsecured bonds that business development companies issue, a first-mover take on BDC debt instead of BDC stock, wrapped in a rules-based index.

Stated mandate

ASGM No data

HBDC The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Solactive Hilton Capital BDC Corporate Bond TR Index.

Why people hold it

ASGM No data

  • HBDC At 0.39% it undercuts the typical alternatives fund (cohort median near 1.01%) and peers like QAI at 0.75% and FTLS at 0.95%.
  • First fund built only around BDC bonds, and it sits above the equity: senior unsecured debt from issuers required by law to keep 150% asset coverage.hiltoncapitalmanagement.comhiltonetfs.com
  • Plumbing is plain: a Solactive index rebalanced quarterly with credit and liquidity screens, and the fund seeks to pay monthly.hiltonetfs.com

Worth knowing

ASGM No data

  • HBDC Non-diversified by design. The BDC bond universe is small, so one issuer's credit trouble carries more weight here than in a broad corporate bond fund.hiltonetfs.com
  • Thinly traded, so spreads can run wider than in mainstream bond ETFs.
  • Launched in 2025, meaning the record is short and has not yet spanned a full credit cycle.

Full ASGM profile⁠

Full HBDC profile⁠

ASGM vs HBDC Holdings

How ASGM and HBDC differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of ASGM and 0.0% of HBDC.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Fixed Income0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile53.4%

Sector

No Sector split for HBDC.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in ASGM and HBDC, widest gap first
CountryMore in ASGMMore in HBDC
United StatesHBDC +46.6 points
JapanASGM +7.7 points
TaiwanASGM +4.5 points
United KingdomASGM +4.3 points
South KoreaASGM +3.1 points
SwitzerlandASGM +3.0 points
ChinaASGM +2.6 points
GermanyASGM +2.4 points
Other countries (33)ASGM +19.0 points

Outside the US: ASGM 66% developed, 34% emerging.

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • ASGM86.3%
  • HBDC12.1%

Securities held

  • ASGM16
  • HBDC155

Asset class

ASGM
Alternatives
HBDC
Fixed Income

Holdings

  • Only in ASGM16
  • In both0
  • Only in HBDC155

Only in ASGM

16 securities, 80.7% of ASGM by weight

  • iShares Core S&P 500 ETF25.01%
  • iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF13.56%
  • iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF7.20%

Only in HBDC

155 securities, 99.3% of HBDC by weight

  • Ares Capital Corp 2.875% 06/15/20281.35%
  • Blue Owl Capital Corp 5.95% 03/15/20291.28%
  • Apollo Debt Solutions BDC 6.9% 04/13/20291.26%

Weight gaps

ASGM and HBDC share no securities.

All 17 ASGM holdings⁠All HBDC holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ASGM vs HBDC Cost

Overpaying ASGM vs HBDC

$8,470

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ASGM 0.86%

    $16,368

  • HBDC 0.39%

    $7,898

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ASGM 0.86%
  • HBDC 0.39%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ASGM $16,368HBDC $7,898

Year by year

YearASGMHBDCOverpaying
10$1,525$705$820
20$5,768$2,725$3,043
30$16,368$7,898$8,470

Expense ratio

  • 0.86%ASGM
  • 0.39%HBDC, cheaper
  • Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
  • Median 1.13%

HBDC cheapest of 29 funds

ASGM 6th cheapest of 29 funds

ASGM vs HBDC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ASGM No data
HBDC 5.15%
Payout (12M)
ASGM No data
HBDC $1.25
Last payment
ASGM $1.20
HBDC $0.11
Ex-dividend
ASGM Dec 22, 2025
HBDC Oct 29, 2026
Paid on
ASGM Dec 29, 2025
HBDC Oct 30, 2026
Frequency
ASGM Irregular
HBDC Monthly

Distribution history

Per share, 2025 to 2026, same scale for both

ASGMIrregular · 1 paymentAll ASGM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2025 $1.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD
HBDCMonthly · 16 paymentsAll HBDC payments⁠
One bar per payment. 16 payments from 2025 to 2026 YTD. Jul 30, 2025 $0.12; Aug 28, 2025 $0.09; Sep 29, 2025 $0.08; Oct 30, 2025 $0.11; Nov 26, 2025 $0.08; Dec 30, 2025 $0.13; Jan 29, 2026 $0.08; Feb 26, 2026 $0.10; Mar 30, 2026 $0.11; Apr 29, 2026 $0.11; May 28, 2026 $0.11; Jun 29, 2026 $0.10; Jul 30, 2026 $0.11; Aug 28, 2026 $0.10; Sep 29, 2026 $0.11; Oct 29, 2026 $0.11. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12026YTD

ASGM vs HBDC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ASGM 13.2%since Sep 2025HBDC 2.5%since Jul 2025
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ASGM 1.62since Sep 2025HBDC −0.28since Jul 2025
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ASGM −7.4%since Aug 2025HBDC −3.0%since Jun 2025
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ASGM 0.91HBDC 0.13

ASGM and HBDC in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ASGMCvsFLSPA

    Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF · Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HBDCAvsFLSPA

    Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF · Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASGMCvsQAIA

    Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF · NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HBDCAvsQAIA

    Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF · NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.81%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASGMCvsQALTA

    Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF · SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • HBDCAvsQALTA

    Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF · SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.39% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.