Skip to content

ASGM vs QAI

Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF

ASGMCNYSE Arca

NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF

QAIANYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QAI −0.05pt a year

ASGM0.86%QAI0.81%

Avg volume · 30D

QAI 45.8×the volume

ASGM1.23KQAI56.1K

ASGM vs QAI Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+23.3%ASGM+6.4%QAI

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. ASGM +23.3%. QAI +6.4%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%10%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
ASGM 0.86%
QAI 0.81%, better
Fund size
ASGM $11M
QAI $999M
1Y total return
ASGM +23.3%, better
QAI +6.4%
Yield (12M)
ASGM No data
QAI 1.42%
Holdings
ASGM 17
QAI 55
Avg volume (30D)
ASGM 1.23K sh
QAI 56.1K sh, better
NAV per share
ASGM $33.05
QAI $35.49
52W range

ETF.net Grade

ASGM: Cost 83, Risk 53, Mission not scored, Tradability 9, Holdings not scored, Durability 20. QAI: Cost 86, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 81, Holdings 50, Durability 84.
Pillar letters and Scores for ASGM, QAI, with each pillar’s weight
PillarASGMQAI
Cost30% weightA83A86Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC53B68Higher
Tradability15% weightF9A81Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC50
Durability5% weightF20A84Higher

Rank among Alternative Strategies funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. ASGM and QAI are both graded against the same 29 Alternative Strategies funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Alternative Strategies⁠

Category · 29 funds
See all 29 ›

QAI ranks 2nd and ASGM 14th of 29 funds in the Alternative Strategies Category.

  1. Rank 1AFLSPFranklin Systematic Style Premia ETFScore 77
  2. Rank 2AHBDCHilton BDC Corporate Bond ETFScore 76
  3. Rank 2AQAINYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETFScore 76
  4. Rank 4AQALTSEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETFScore 74
  5. Rank 13BEDGH3EDGE Dynamic Hard Assets ETFScore 55
  6. Rank 14CASGMVirtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETFScore 54
  7. Rank 15CEVNTAltShares Event-Driven ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

ASGMCVirtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF

QAIANYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF

In short

ASGM No data

QAI The original hedge fund replication ETF, listed in 2009: a fund of roughly 50 exchange-traded products tracking an index built to mimic hedge fund styles, for 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross).

Stated mandate

ASGM No data

QAI The Fund seeks to track the performance of the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index before fees and expenses. It uses passive indexing and invests primarily in exchange-traded products and related financial instruments representing the index.

Why people hold it

ASGM No data

  • QAI Billed as the first US-listed hedge fund replication ETF when it launched in March 2009, so it carries a record across multiple market cycles rather than a backtest.asiaasset.com
  • Costs 0.81% net of a fee waiver (1.03% gross), below the alternatives category median and under IALT's 0.99%.
  • Plain plumbing for an exotic idea: it holds exchange-traded products and related instruments to passively track the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index, and trades on an exchange all day.
  • Stands near the front of the roughly 30 alternatives funds in its peer group on our review.

Worth knowing

ASGM No data

  • QAI Fund-of-funds design means your exposure runs through other ETFs and the index's mapping of them to hedge fund styles, with gross expenses of 1.03% against the 0.81% net line.
  • Cheaper shelves sit nearby: FLSP at 0.65% and HBDC at 0.39%, though neither runs the same multi-strategy replication mandate.
  • Moderately traded rather than a category volume leader, and payouts arrive annually or semiannually, so this is not an income-cadence vehicle.

Full ASGM profile⁠

Full QAI profile⁠

ASGM vs QAI Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

ASGM vs QAI Cost

Overpaying ASGM vs QAI

$850

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • ASGM 0.86%

    $16,368

  • QAI 0.81%

    $15,518

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • ASGM 0.86%
  • QAI 0.81%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530ASGM $16,368QAI $15,518

Year by year

YearASGMQAIOverpaying
10$1,525$1,439$86
20$5,768$5,456$312
30$16,368$15,518$850

Expense ratio

  • 0.86%ASGM
  • 0.81%QAI, cheaper
  • Middle half of Alternative Strategies funds
  • Median 1.13%

QAI 5th cheapest of 29 funds

ASGM 6th cheapest of 29 funds

ASGM vs QAI Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
ASGM No data
QAI 1.42%
Payout (12M)
ASGM No data
QAI $0.50
Last payment
ASGM $1.20
QAI $0.50
Ex-dividend
ASGM Dec 22, 2025
QAI Dec 30, 2025
Paid on
ASGM Dec 29, 2025
QAI Jan 5, 2026
Frequency
ASGM Irregular
QAI Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

ASGMIrregular · 1 paymentAll ASGM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 1 payment from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 22, 2025 $1.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
QAIAnnual · 8 paymentsAll QAI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 8 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2018 $0.55; Dec 30, 2019 $0.59; Dec 30, 2020 $0.63; Dec 29, 2021 $0.09; Dec 29, 2022 $0.57; Dec 28, 2023 $1.23; Dec 30, 2024 $0.70; Dec 30, 2025 $0.50. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

ASGM vs QAI Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
ASGM 13.2%since Sep 2025QAI 5.2%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
ASGM 1.62since Sep 2025QAI 0.81
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
ASGM −7.4%since Aug 2025QAI −14.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
ASGM 0.91QAI 0.35

ASGM and QAI in the news

Popular comparisons

  • ASGMCvsFLSPA

    Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF · Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QAIAvsFLSPA

    NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF · Franklin Systematic Style Premia ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.81% · 0.65%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASGMCvsHBDCA

    Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF · Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QAIAvsHBDCA

    NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF · Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.81% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • ASGMCvsQALTA

    Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF · SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.86% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QAIAvsQALTA

    NYLI Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF · SEI DBi Multi-Strategy Alternative ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.81% · 0.80%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.