AUGP ranks 2nd and BMAY 37th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
AUGP vs BMAY
AUGP −0.29pt a year
0.50%0.79%
BMAY 2.7×the volume
7.35K20.1K
AUGP vs BMAY Performance
+10.3%+9.4%
- AUGP 0.50%, better
- BMAY 0.79%
- AUGP $38M
- BMAY $180M
- AUGP +10.3%, better
- BMAY +9.4%
- AUGP 4
- BMAY 3
- AUGP 7.35K sh
- BMAY 20.1K sh, better
- AUGP $34.23
- BMAY $48.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUGP | BMAY |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | C40 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | B68 |
| Tradability | F24 | C52Higher |
| Holdings | ||
| Durability | D38 | A73Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. AUGP and BMAY are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUGPB
BMAYC
In short
BMAY Innovator's May-dated buffer fund: it shadows the S&P 500 up to a preset cap and absorbs the first 9% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets each May 1. The shallow buffer is what buys the higher cap.
Stated mandate
BMAY The fund seeks to track SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the outcome period.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUGP vs BMAY Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUGP vs BMAY Cost
Overpaying BMAY vs AUGP
$5,195
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUGP 0.50%
$9,979
BMAY 0.79%
$15,174
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUGP | BMAY | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,405 | $505 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,331 | $1,871 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $15,174 | $5,195 |
- 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
- 0.79%BMAY
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds
BMAY 34th cheapest of 77 funds
AUGP vs BMAY Dividends
- AUGP None
- BMAY None
Distribution history
AUGP vs BMAY Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUGP 6.2%BMAY 6.1%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUGP 1.31BMAY 1.82
- Worst fall
- AUGP −11.1%BMAY −17.7%
- Market sensitivity
- AUGP 0.53BMAY 0.48
Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.