Skip to content

BMAY vs SIXJ

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

BMAYCCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

SIXJBCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

SIXJ −0.05pt a year

BMAY0.79%SIXJ0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

BMAY 1.3×the volume

BMAY20.1KSIXJ15.1K

3Y return · a year

BMAY +1.5pt

BMAY+16.4%SIXJ+14.9%

BMAY vs SIXJ Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+9.4%BMAY+10.5%SIXJ

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. BMAY +9.4%. SIXJ +10.5%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%2.5%5%12.5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
BMAY 0.79%
SIXJ 0.74%, better
Fund size
BMAY $180M
SIXJ $149M
1Y total return
BMAY +9.4%
SIXJ +10.5%, better
Holdings
BMAY 3
SIXJ 3
Avg volume (30D)
BMAY 20.1K sh, better
SIXJ 15.1K sh
NAV per share
BMAY $48.33
SIXJ $37.56
52W range

ETF.net Grade

BMAY: Cost 40, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 52, Holdings not scored, Durability 73. SIXJ: Cost 68, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 70, Holdings 53, Durability 57.
Pillar letters and Scores for BMAY, SIXJ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarBMAYSIXJ
Cost30% weightC40B68Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB68HigherB67
Tradability15% weightC52A70Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredC53
Durability5% weightA73HigherB57

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. BMAY and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

SIXJ ranks 4th and BMAY 37th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 4BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 65
  5. Rank 5BBUFMAB Moderate Buffer ETFScore 64
  6. Rank 37CBJUNInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  7. Rank 37CBMAYInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 51
  8. Rank 40CBNOVInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 50

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

BMAYCInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF

SIXJBAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

In short

BMAY Innovator's May-dated buffer fund: it shadows the S&P 500 up to a preset cap and absorbs the first 9% of losses over a one-year outcome period that resets each May 1. The shallow buffer is what buys the higher cap.

SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.

Stated mandate

BMAY The fund seeks to track SPY's return up to a predetermined cap while protecting against the first 9% of losses during the outcome period.

SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

  • BMAY The contract is spelled out up front: first 9% of S&P 500 losses absorbed, gains capped, over a defined period ending April 30. You know the shape of the outcome before you own it.
  • 0.79% a year, right at the median for its buffer cohort. Options-built defense costs more than plain index beta, but you aren't paying above the going rate for it.
  • Live since 2020, with several full outcome periods behind it rather than a launch-week track record.
  • Lands in the upper half of a crowded cohort of 50-plus shallow S&P 500 buffer funds.
  • SIXJ The 10% buffer and the cap reset every January 1 and July 1, so terms refresh twice a year instead of on the usual annual clock.
  • 0.74% expense ratio, on the lean side for a defined-outcome fund and below the typical fee among its shallow-buffer peers.
  • The reference asset is SPY itself, the original S&P 500 ETF, so the payoff is keyed to a plain vanilla benchmark rather than a bespoke index.
  • Rates among the stronger implementations in a crowded shallow-buffer field, alongside AllianzIM's other six-month siblings like SIXZ and SIXD.

Worth knowing

  • BMAY The 9% buffer and the cap belong to the full outcome period. Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever protection and upside are left, not the headline terms.
  • Thinly traded next to the S&P 500 giants, so spreads can be wider and limit orders earn their keep.
  • Innovator's laddered sibling BUFB spreads across start months and carries a 0.10% expense ratio, a cheaper route for anyone who doesn't want a single calendar slot.
  • SIXJ Buffer and cap are designed to work over the full six-month period. Buy mid-period and you get whatever cushion and upside room remain at that moment.
  • It tracks SPY's share-price return, so dividends aren't passed through and the fund isn't structured to pay income.
  • Volume is light next to the largest buffer funds, so bid-ask spreads can run wider, especially in fast-moving markets.

Full BMAY profile⁠

Full SIXJ profile⁠

BMAY vs SIXJ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

BMAY vs SIXJ Cost

Overpaying BMAY vs SIXJ

$867

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • BMAY 0.79%

    $15,174

  • SIXJ 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • BMAY 0.79%
  • SIXJ 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530BMAY $15,174SIXJ $14,307

Year by year

YearBMAYSIXJOverpaying
10$1,405$1,319$86
20$5,331$5,015$316
30$15,174$14,307$867

Expense ratio

  • 0.79%BMAY
  • 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds

BMAY 34th cheapest of 77 funds

BMAY vs SIXJ Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
BMAY None
SIXJ None

Distribution history

BMAYAll BMAY payments⁠

No distribution history available.

SIXJAll SIXJ payments⁠

No distribution history available.

BMAY vs SIXJ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
BMAY 6.1%SIXJ 5.9%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
BMAY 1.82, betterSIXJ 1.67
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
BMAY −17.7%SIXJ −14.1%since Jan 2022
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
BMAY 0.48SIXJ 0.46

Popular comparisons

  • BMAYCvsZALTA

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMAYCvsAUGPB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • BMAYCvsTENJB

    Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • SIXJBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.