Skip to content
etf.net

AUGP vs FEBZ

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

AUGPBCboe

TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF

FEBZDCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

AUGP −0.29pt a year

AUGP0.50%FEBZ0.79%

Avg volume · 30D

AUGP 2.9×the volume

AUGP7.49KFEBZ2.61K

AUGP vs FEBZ Performance

Nov 5, 2025 – Nov 5, 2026

+8.9%AUGP+5.6%FEBZ

Nov 5, 2025 to Nov 5, 2026. AUGP +8.9%. FEBZ +5.6%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AUGP 0.50%, better
FEBZ 0.79%
Fund size
AUGP $38M
FEBZ $32M
1Y total return
AUGP +8.9%, better
FEBZ +5.6%
Yield (12M)
AUGP No data
FEBZ 3.04%
Holdings
AUGP 5
FEBZ 16
Avg volume (30D)
AUGP 7.49K sh, better
FEBZ 2.61K sh
NAV per share
AUGP $34.19
FEBZ $40.92
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGP: Cost 91, Risk 68, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings not scored, Durability 32. FEBZ: Cost 40, Risk 27, Mission not scored, Tradability 37, Holdings not scored, Durability 30.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGP, FEBZ, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGPFEBZ
Cost30% weightA91HigherC40
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightB68HigherD27
Tradability15% weightF24D37Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD32HigherD30

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGP and FEBZ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

AUGP ranks 3rd and FEBZ 70th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BSIXJAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETFScore 66
  3. Rank 3BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 65
  4. Rank 4BBUFMAB Moderate Buffer ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 70DDGOCFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - OctoberScore 35
  6. Rank 70DFEBZTrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETFScore 35
  7. Rank 72DAUGZTrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETFScore 34

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGPBPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

FEBZDTrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF

In short

AUGP No data

FEBZ Most buffer ETFs sell you downside protection and quietly take your upside in return. FEBZ skips the cap: it aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price losses over a 12-month stretch with no ceiling bolted onto the gains.

Stated mandate

AUGP No data

FEBZ FEBZ seeks pre-fee, pre-expense returns tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index while protecting against the first 8%-12% of index losses over a 12-month period.

Why people hold it

AUGP No data

  • FEBZ No upside cap. Where most buffered funds hard-stop your gains at a set number, this one keeps participating as the index climbs.true-shares.comtrue-shares.com 2
  • Actively managed options on the S&P 500 Price Index, aiming to buffer the first 8% to 12% of index losses over a 12-month period that resets each February.true-shares.com
  • Running since 2021, part of the original uncapped buffered series rather than a me-too launch chasing the outcome-ETF boom.true-shares.com

Worth knowing

AUGP No data

  • FEBZ Uncapped is not full upside. The issuer states the participation rate is expected to land below 100% of the market move, and it is reset with each period.true-shares.com
  • The buffer is a range (8% to 12%), set at each reset and measured from the period's starting level, so buying mid-period can mean less cushion than the label suggests.true-shares.com
  • Fee sits at the category median, and this is a small, lightly traded fund. Laddered rival BUFB runs 0.10%, so the uncapped design is what you are paying up for.

Full AUGP profile⁠

Full FEBZ profile⁠

AUGP vs FEBZ Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGP vs FEBZ Cost

Overpaying FEBZ vs AUGP

$5,195

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • FEBZ 0.79%

    $15,174

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGP 0.50%
  • FEBZ 0.79%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K$20K051015202530FEBZ $15,174AUGP $9,979

Year by year

YearAUGPFEBZOverpaying
10$900$1,405$505
20$3,460$5,331$1,871
30$9,979$15,174$5,195

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
  • 0.79%FEBZ
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds

FEBZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGP vs FEBZ Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 5, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUGP No data
FEBZ 3.04%
Payout (12M)
AUGP None
FEBZ $1.20
Last payment
AUGP No data
FEBZ $1.20
Ex-dividend
AUGP No data
FEBZ Dec 24, 2025
Paid on
AUGP No data
FEBZ Dec 26, 2025
Frequency
AUGP No data
FEBZ Annual

Distribution history

Per share, 2023 to 2026, same scale for both

AUGPAll AUGP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

FEBZAnnual · 3 paymentsAll FEBZ payments⁠
One bar per payment. 3 payments from 2023 to 2026 YTD. Dec 27, 2023 $2.08; Dec 27, 2024 $1.33; Dec 24, 2025 $1.20. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$220232026YTD

AUGP vs FEBZ Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGP 6.2%since Jun 2024FEBZ 9.1%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGP 1.31since Jun 2024FEBZ 1.20
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGP −11.1%since May 2024FEBZ −17.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGP 0.54FEBZ 0.72

Popular comparisons

  • AUGPBvsZALTA

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FEBZDvsZALTA

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsSIXJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FEBZDvsSIXJB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsBUFMB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • FEBZDvsBUFMB

    TrueShares Structured Outcome (February) ETF · AB Moderate Buffer ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.79% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.