SIXJ ranks 2nd and FEBZ 70th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
FEBZ vs SIXJ
SIXJ −0.05pt a year
0.79%0.74%
SIXJ 5.8×the volume
2.61K15.1K
FEBZ +0.4pt
+14.2%+13.8%
FEBZ vs SIXJ Performance
+5.6%+8.6%
- FEBZ 0.79%
- SIXJ 0.74%, better
- FEBZ $32M
- SIXJ $149M
- FEBZ +5.6%
- SIXJ +8.6%, better
- FEBZ 3.04%
- SIXJ
- FEBZ 16
- SIXJ 3
- FEBZ 2.61K sh
- SIXJ 15.1K sh, better
- FEBZ $40.92
- SIXJ $37.49
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FEBZ | SIXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | C40 | B68Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D27 | A72Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | A71Higher |
| Holdings | C53 | |
| Durability | D30 | B57Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. FEBZ and SIXJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FEBZD
SIXJB
In short
FEBZ Most buffer ETFs sell you downside protection and quietly take your upside in return. FEBZ skips the cap: it aims to absorb the first 8% to 12% of S&P 500 price losses over a 12-month stretch with no ceiling bolted onto the gains.
SIXJ Most buffer ETFs lock you into a 12-month cycle. SIXJ runs a six-month one, resetting each January and July: it tracks SPY's share-price move, absorbs the first 10% of losses, and takes a fresh upside cap twice a year.
Stated mandate
FEBZ FEBZ seeks pre-fee, pre-expense returns tracking the S&P 500 Price Return Index while protecting against the first 8%-12% of index losses over a 12-month period.
SIXJ The Fund seeks to match the share-price return of SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust over a six-month outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FEBZ vs SIXJ Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FEBZ vs SIXJ Cost
Overpaying FEBZ vs SIXJ
$867
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FEBZ 0.79%
$15,174
SIXJ 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FEBZ | SIXJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,405 | $1,319 | $86 |
| 20 | $5,331 | $5,015 | $316 |
| 30 | $15,174 | $14,307 | $867 |
- 0.79%FEBZ
- 0.74%SIXJ, cheaper
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
SIXJ 17th cheapest of 77 funds
FEBZ 34th cheapest of 77 funds
FEBZ vs SIXJ Dividends
- FEBZ 3.04%
- SIXJ
- FEBZ $1.20
- SIXJ None
- FEBZ $1.20
- SIXJ
- FEBZ Dec 24, 2025
- SIXJ
- FEBZ Dec 26, 2025
- SIXJ
- FEBZ Annual
- SIXJ
Distribution history
FEBZ vs SIXJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FEBZ 9.1%SIXJ 5.9%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- FEBZ 1.20SIXJ 1.67, better
- Worst fall
- FEBZ −17.5%SIXJ −14.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FEBZ 0.72SIXJ 0.46
Popular comparisons
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.79% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.