Skip to content
etf.net

AUGP vs JULC

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

AUGPBCboe

Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series

JULCCCboe

Overlap

Expense ratio

JULC −0.20pt a year

AUGP0.50%JULC0.30%

Avg volume · 30D

AUGP 4.8×the volume

AUGP7.35KJULC1.53K

AUGP vs JULC Performance

Jul 31, 2026 – Oct 29, 2026

+2.5%AUGP+2.8%JULC

Jul 31, 2026 to Oct 29, 2026. AUGP +2.5%. JULC +2.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%1%2%Jul 2026Sep 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUGP 0.50%
JULC 0.30%, better
Fund size
AUGP $38M
JULC $2M
1Y total return
AUGP +10.3%
JULC No data
Holdings
AUGP 4
JULC 4
Avg volume (30D)
AUGP 7.35K sh, better
JULC 1.53K sh
NAV per share
AUGP $34.23
JULC $25.52
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGP: Cost 91, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. JULC: Cost 97, Risk 60, Mission not scored, Tradability 8, Holdings not scored, Durability 2.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGP, JULC, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGPJULC
Cost30% weightA91A97Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA72HigherB60
Tradability15% weightF24HigherF8
Holdings10% weightNot scoredNot scored
Durability5% weightD38HigherF2

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

How we build Categories ›
Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGP and JULC are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

AUGP ranks 2nd and JULC 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 57CFOCTFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - OctoberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CJULCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July SeriesScore 40
  6. Rank 57CJUNCCorgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - June SeriesScore 40

AUGP vs JULC Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGP vs JULC Cost

Overpaying AUGP vs JULC

$3,830

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • JULC 0.30%

    $6,149

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGP 0.50%
  • JULC 0.30%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K$10K051015202530AUGP $9,979JULC $6,149

Year by year

YearAUGPJULCOverpaying
10$900$545$355
20$3,460$2,113$1,347
30$9,979$6,149$3,830

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AUGP
  • 0.30%JULC, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

JULC 2nd cheapest of 77 funds

AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGP vs JULC Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
AUGP None
JULC None

Distribution history

AUGPAll AUGP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

JULCAll JULC payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AUGP vs JULC Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGP 6.2%since Jun 2024JULC No data
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGP 1.31since Jun 2024JULC No data
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGP −11.1%since May 2024JULC No data
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGP 0.53JULC 0.00

Popular comparisons

  • AUGPBvsZALTA

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULCCvsZALTA

    Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsTENJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULCCvsTENJB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • AUGPBvsSIXJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

  • JULCCvsSIXJB

    Corgi U.S. Equities 10% Structured Buffer ETF - July Series · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.