TENJ ranks 3rd and JULC 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
JULC vs TENJ
0.0%by weight
JULC −0.23pt a year
0.30%0.53%
TENJ 16.1×the volume
1.53K24.6K
JULC vs TENJ Performance
+2.8%+2.6%
- JULC 0.30%, better
- TENJ 0.53%
- JULC $2M
- TENJ $47M
- JULC
- TENJ +11.7%
- JULC 4
- TENJ 4
- JULC 1.53K sh
- TENJ 24.6K sh, better
- JULC $25.52
- TENJ $28.09
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | JULC | TENJ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A97Higher | A86 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | F8 | B66Higher |
| Holdings | C51 | |
| Durability | F2 | C41Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. JULC and TENJ are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
JULC vs TENJ Holdings
How JULC and TENJ differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of JULC and 0.0% of TENJ.
Level by level
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for TENJ.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in JULCMore in TENJ | JULC | TENJ |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | TENJ +0.1 points | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | JULC +0.1 points | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- JULC102.5%
- TENJ102.6%
- JULC3
- TENJ2
Asset class
- JULC
- Equity
- TENJ
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in JULC3
- In both0
- Only in TENJ2
Only in JULC
3 securities, 98.9% of JULC by weight
- Spy 06/30/2027 149.14 C75.37%
- United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.25% 06/30/202719.71%
- Spy 06/30/2027 745.72 P3.81%
Only in TENJ
2 securities, 100% of TENJ by weight
- Ishares Core S&P Etf Trust97.64%
- JUL27 Ivv Us P @ 748.894.03%
Weight gaps
JULC and TENJ share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
JULC vs TENJ Cost
Overpaying TENJ vs JULC
$4,387
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
JULC 0.30%
$6,149
TENJ 0.53%
$10,536
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | JULC | TENJ | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $545 | $953 | $408 |
| 20 | $2,113 | $3,658 | $1,545 |
| 30 | $6,149 | $10,536 | $4,387 |
- 0.30%JULC, cheaper
- 0.53%TENJ
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
JULC 2nd cheapest of 77 funds
TENJ 11th cheapest of 77 funds
JULC vs TENJ Dividends
- JULC None
- TENJ
- JULC
- TENJ $0.07
- JULC
- TENJ Dec 23, 2025
- JULC
- TENJ Dec 29, 2025
- JULC
- TENJ Irregular
Distribution history
JULC vs TENJ Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- JULC TENJ 8.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- JULC TENJ 0.90
- Worst fall
- JULC TENJ −5.5%
- Market sensitivity
- JULC 0.00TENJ 0.63
Popular comparisons
- 0.30% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.53% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.