AUGP ranks 2nd and OCTT 10th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.
AUGP vs OCTT
0.0%by weight
AUGP −0.24pt a year
0.50%0.74%
OCTT 3.8×the volume
7.35K27.7K
AUGP vs OCTT Performance
+10.3%+12.0%
- AUGP 0.50%, better
- OCTT 0.74%
- AUGP $38M
- OCTT $121M
- AUGP +10.3%
- OCTT +12.0%, better
- AUGP 4
- OCTT 2
- AUGP 7.35K sh
- OCTT 27.7K sh, better
- AUGP $34.23
- OCTT $48.85
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AUGP | OCTT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A91Higher | B68 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | A72Higher | C45 |
| Tradability | F24 | A74Higher |
| Holdings | B55 | |
| Durability | D38 | C54Higher |
Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
Same Category. AUGP and OCTT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AUGPB
OCTTB
In short
OCTT A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500, rebuckled every October 1. OCTT cushions the first 10% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price losses and trades away gains above a cap, with the options book run by Allianz Life's own investment arm.
Stated mandate
OCTT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and a buffer against the first 10% of losses.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AUGP vs OCTT Holdings
How AUGP and OCTT differ
0.0%
Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AUGP and 0.0% of OCTT.
Level by level
- Asset class0.0%
- Holdings0.0%
Sector
No Sector split for AUGP.
Country, concentration and asset class
Country
| Country | More in AUGPMore in OCTT | AUGP | OCTT |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Same weight | 99.5% | 99.5% |
| Switzerland | Same weight | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| China | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Mexico | Same weight | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| Ireland | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| United Kingdom | Same weight | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Concentration
- AUGP103.3%
- OCTT103.9%
- AUGP3
- OCTT2
Asset class
- AUGP
- Alternatives
- OCTT
- Equity
Holdings
- Only in AUGP3
- In both0
- Only in OCTT2
Only in AUGP
3 securities, 100% of AUGP by weight
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 C7.4798.85%
- 4SPY Us 07/30/27 P747.033.59%
- Net Current Assets<0.01%
Only in OCTT
2 securities, 100% of OCTT by weight
- Spy 09/30/2027 5.64 C99.16%
- Spy 09/30/2027 762.55 P4.72%
Weight gaps
AUGP and OCTT share no securities.
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AUGP vs OCTT Cost
Overpaying OCTT vs AUGP
$4,328
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AUGP 0.50%
$9,979
OCTT 0.74%
$14,307
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AUGP | OCTT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $900 | $1,319 | $419 |
| 20 | $3,460 | $5,015 | $1,555 |
| 30 | $9,979 | $14,307 | $4,328 |
- 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
- 0.74%OCTT
- Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
- Median 0.79%
AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds
OCTT 17th cheapest of 77 funds
AUGP vs OCTT Dividends
- AUGP None
- OCTT None
Distribution history
AUGP vs OCTT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AUGP 6.2%OCTT 7.6%
- Return per unit of risk
- AUGP 1.31OCTT 1.38
- Worst fall
- AUGP −11.1%OCTT −13.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AUGP 0.53OCTT 0.60
AUGP and OCTT in the news
Filings Digest
AllianzIM launches OCTI and resets October buffer terms

Popular comparisons
- 0.50% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.69%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.53%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.50% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.74% · 0.74%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.