Skip to content

AUGP vs OCTT

PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

AUGPBCboe

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF

OCTTBCboe

Overlap

0.0%by weight

Expense ratio

AUGP −0.24pt a year

AUGP0.50%OCTT0.74%

Avg volume · 30D

OCTT 3.8×the volume

AUGP7.35KOCTT27.7K

AUGP vs OCTT Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.3%AUGP+12.0%OCTT

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUGP +10.3%. OCTT +12.0%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%15%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUGP 0.50%, better
OCTT 0.74%
Fund size
AUGP $38M
OCTT $121M
1Y total return
AUGP +10.3%
OCTT +12.0%, better
Holdings
AUGP 4
OCTT 2
Avg volume (30D)
AUGP 7.35K sh
OCTT 27.7K sh, better
NAV per share
AUGP $34.23
OCTT $48.85
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGP: Cost 91, Risk 72, Mission not scored, Tradability 24, Holdings not scored, Durability 38. OCTT: Cost 68, Risk 45, Mission not scored, Tradability 74, Holdings 55, Durability 54.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGP, OCTT, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGPOCTT
Cost30% weightA91HigherB68
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightA72HigherC45
Tradability15% weightF24A74Higher
Holdings10% weightNot scoredB55
Durability5% weightD38C54Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGP and OCTT are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

AUGP ranks 2nd and OCTT 10th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 1AZALTInnovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - QuarterlyScore 77
  2. Rank 2BAUGPPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - AugustScore 67
  3. Rank 3BTENJiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETFScore 66
  4. Rank 7BTENDiShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 10BOCTTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETFScore 62
  6. Rank 10BSIXDAllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jun/Dec ETFScore 62

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGPBPGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

OCTTBAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF

In short

AUGP No data

OCTT A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500, rebuckled every October 1. OCTT cushions the first 10% of the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust's price losses and trades away gains above a cap, with the options book run by Allianz Life's own investment arm.

Stated mandate

AUGP No data

OCTT The Fund seeks to match the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust’s share-price return at the end of each one-year Outcome Period, subject to an upside Cap and a buffer against the first 10% of losses.

Why people hold it

AUGP No data

  • OCTT The deal is written down, not implied: first 10% of the reference ETF's price losses buffered, upside capped, over a fixed October 1 to September 30 window that resets like clockwork.allianzim.com
  • 0.74% a year, a notch under the typical shallow-buffer S&P fund and cheaper than the 0.79% charged by the Innovator October series (BOCT).
  • Hedging is the parent's day job. AllianzIM is a wholly owned unit of Allianz Life, and it manages the FLEX options in-house instead of outsourcing the trade.tradersmagazine.comallianzim.com
  • Running since 2020, it's one of the sturdier builds among shallow-buffer S&P funds, sitting in the upper half of a crowded 52-fund field.

Worth knowing

AUGP No data

  • OCTT The 10% cushion is a full-period promise. Buy in mid-period or sell early and you get whatever the options are worth that day, not the headline buffer.allianzim.com
  • Buffer and cap are stated before fees and expenses, so the 0.74% comes out of whatever the structure delivers.allianzim.com
  • Thinly traded and built without an income component, so limit orders matter and the whole result shows up in the share price.

Full AUGP profile⁠

Full OCTT profile⁠

AUGP vs OCTT Holdings

How AUGP and OCTT differ

Overlap by weight

0.0%

Shared holdings make up 0.0% of AUGP and 0.0% of OCTT.

Level by level

  • Asset classAlternatives, Equity0.0%
  • Holdings0 in both0.0%
  • Countryby domicile100%

Sector

No Sector split for AUGP.

Country, concentration and asset class

Country by domicile

Country weights in AUGP and OCTT, widest gap first
CountryMore in AUGPMore in OCTT
United StatesSame weight
SwitzerlandSame weight
ChinaSame weight
MexicoSame weight
IrelandSame weight
United KingdomSame weight

Concentration

Weight in the 10 largest Holdings

  • AUGP103.3%
  • OCTT103.9%

Securities held

  • AUGP3
  • OCTT2

Asset class

AUGP
Alternatives
OCTT
Equity

Holdings

  • Only in AUGP3
  • In both0
  • Only in OCTT2

Only in AUGP

3 securities, 100% of AUGP by weight

  • 4SPY Us 07/30/27 C7.4798.85%
  • 4SPY Us 07/30/27 P747.033.59%
  • Net Current Assets<0.01%

Only in OCTT

2 securities, 100% of OCTT by weight

  • Spy 09/30/2027 5.64 C99.16%
  • Spy 09/30/2027 762.55 P4.72%

Weight gaps

AUGP and OCTT share no securities.

All AUGP holdings⁠All 5 OCTT holdings⁠

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGP vs OCTT Cost

Overpaying OCTT vs AUGP

$4,328

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGP 0.50%

    $9,979

  • OCTT 0.74%

    $14,307

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGP 0.50%
  • OCTT 0.74%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530OCTT $14,307AUGP $9,979

Year by year

YearAUGPOCTTOverpaying
10$900$1,319$419
20$3,460$5,015$1,555
30$9,979$14,307$4,328

Expense ratio

  • 0.50%AUGP, cheaper
  • 0.74%OCTT
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

AUGP 5th cheapest of 77 funds

OCTT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGP vs OCTT Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Payout (12M)
AUGP None
OCTT None

Distribution history

AUGPAll AUGP payments⁠

No distribution history available.

OCTTAll OCTT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

AUGP vs OCTT Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGP 6.2%since Jun 2024OCTT 7.6%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGP 1.31since Jun 2024OCTT 1.38
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGP −11.1%since May 2024OCTT −13.5%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGP 0.53OCTT 0.60

AUGP and OCTT in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AUGPBvsZALTA

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OCTTBvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGPBvsTENJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OCTTBvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGPBvsSIXJB

    PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.50% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • OCTTBvsSIXJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Oct ETF · AllianzIM U.S. Equity 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.74%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.