Skip to content

AUGT vs XTR

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF

AUGTCCboe

Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

XTRCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

XTR −0.49pt a year

AUGT0.74%XTR0.25%

Avg volume · 30D

AUGT 1.9×the volume

AUGT3.07KXTR1.64K

3Y return · a year

XTR +0.9pt

AUGT+18.3%XTR+19.2%

AUGT vs XTR Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+10.8%AUGT+7.9%XTR

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. AUGT +10.8%. XTR +7.9%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−5%0%5%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
AUGT 0.74%
XTR 0.25%, better
Fund size
AUGT $36M
XTR $5M
1Y total return
AUGT +10.8%, better
XTR +7.9%
Yield (12M)
AUGT No data
XTR 16.45%
Holdings
AUGT 2
XTR 506
Avg volume (30D)
AUGT 3.07K sh, better
XTR 1.64K sh
NAV per share
AUGT $39.50
XTR $28.54
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUGT: Cost 68, Risk 58, Mission 100, Tradability 27, Holdings 52, Durability 40. XTR: Cost 100, Risk 18, Mission not scored, Tradability 13, Holdings 85, Durability 46.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUGT, XTR, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUGTXTR
Cost30% weightB68A100Higher
Mission25% weightA100Not scored
Risk15% weightB58HigherF18
Tradability15% weightD27HigherF13
Holdings10% weightC52A85Higher
Durability5% weightC40C46Higher

Rank among S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUGT and XTR are both graded against the same 77 S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

S&P 500 Buffer 9-12%⁠

Category · 77 funds
See all 77 ›

AUGT ranks 32nd and XTR 57th of 77 funds in the S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% Category.

  1. Rank 30BBSEPInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 54
  2. Rank 32CAUGTAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETFScore 53
  3. Rank 32BBJULInnovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETFScore 53
  4. Rank 57CXIDEFT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - DecemberScore 40
  5. Rank 57CXTRGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 64DJULZTrueshares Structured Outcome (July) ETFScore 39

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUGTCAllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF

XTRCGlobal X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF

In short

AUGT A one-year seatbelt on the S&P 500. It absorbs the first 10% of the decline in the big S&P 500 ETF it references and gives up gains above a cap that resets annually, all for 0.74% a year, below the shallow-buffer median.

XTR Most downside-protection ETFs sell away your upside to pay for it. XTR pays cash instead: it owns the S&P 500 stocks and buys 10% out-of-the-money puts every quarter, leaving the upside uncapped.

Stated mandate

AUGT The fund seeks to match SPY’s share-price return over a one-year outcome period, subject to an upside cap and protection against the first 10% of SPY losses.

XTR The Fund seeks to track the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index before fees and expenses.

Why people hold it

  • AUGT At 0.74% it undercuts the 0.79% median for shallow-buffer funds, including August-dated peer BAUG. Fee drag comes straight out of the cap you get.
  • The reference is the S&P 500 ETF itself, not an abstract index, and the buffer absorbs the first 10% of its share-price decline over the outcome period.
  • AllianzIM runs the same 10% structure in other calendar months (JULT, SEPT, OCTT) at the same fee, and this one sits in the upper half of its peer group.
  • XTR No cap on the gains. The hedge is bought with cash rather than funded by selling calls, so index rallies come through less the put premium and fees.sec.gov
  • Costs 0.25%, well under half of what the defined-outcome funds it competes with typically charge for downside protection.
  • Owns the roughly 500 S&P 500 stocks themselves, with the put position layered on top, rather than wrapping the index in a stack of options.sec.gov
  • Rules-based and mechanical: puts are bought at 10% below the prevailing index level each quarter and held to expiration, with no manager guessing at timing.sec.gov

Worth knowing

  • AUGT The cap is reset for each new outcome period off option prices at the time, so the ceiling shifts from year to year and is not known in advance.
  • Buy mid-period and you inherit whatever buffer and cap remain, not the headline 10%. The stated terms describe a hold from one reset to the next.
  • Thinly traded on a small asset base, so bid-ask spreads can run wider than in the giants of the buffer aisle.
  • XTR Protection starts about 10% down and resets quarterly, so garden-variety dips are absorbed in full and the gap widens if the market rallies mid-quarter.sec.gov
  • Insurance is not free. The quarterly premium is a steady cost against plain index exposure, and in calm markets the puts expire worthless.sec.gov
  • A small fund that trades thinly, so limit orders matter and subscale products carry more risk of being closed than the category's giants.

Full AUGT profile⁠

Full XTR profile⁠

AUGT vs XTR Holdings

As of
How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUGT vs XTR Cost

Overpaying AUGT vs XTR

$9,148

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUGT 0.74%

    $14,307

  • XTR 0.25%

    $5,159

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUGT 0.74%
  • XTR 0.25%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530AUGT $14,307XTR $5,159

Year by year

YearAUGTXTROverpaying
10$1,319$455$864
20$5,015$1,769$3,246
30$14,307$5,159$9,148

Expense ratio

  • 0.74%AUGT
  • 0.25%XTR, cheaper
  • Middle half of S&P 500 Buffer 9-12% funds
  • Median 0.79%

XTR cheapest of 77 funds

AUGT 17th cheapest of 77 funds

AUGT vs XTR Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUGT No data
XTR 16.45%
Payout (12M)
AUGT None
XTR $4.69
Last payment
AUGT No data
XTR $0.08
Ex-dividend
AUGT No data
XTR Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
AUGT No data
XTR Jul 2, 2026
Frequency
AUGT No data
XTR Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2021 to 2026, same scale for both

AUGTAll AUGT payments⁠

No distribution history available.

XTRTwice a year · 10 paymentsAll XTR payments⁠
One bar per payment. 10 payments from 2021 to 2026 YTD. Dec 30, 2021 $0.64; Jun 29, 2022 $0.10; Dec 29, 2022 $0.15; Jun 29, 2023 $0.10; Dec 28, 2023 $0.19; Jun 27, 2024 $0.17; Dec 30, 2024 $5.55; Jun 27, 2025 $0.11; Dec 30, 2025 $4.61; Jun 29, 2026 $0.08. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$520232026YTD

AUGT vs XTR Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUGT 8.0%, betterXTR 11.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUGT 1.61, betterXTR 1.19
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUGT −13.1%since Aug 2023XTR −20.8%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUGT 0.65XTR 0.94

AUGT and XTR in the news

Popular comparisons

  • AUGTCvsZALTA

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsZALTA

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · Innovator U.S. Equity 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.69%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGTCvsAUGPB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsAUGPB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUGTCvsTENJB

    AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer10 Aug ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.74% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • XTRCvsTENJB

    Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF · iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Jun ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.25% · 0.53%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.