Skip to content

AUMI vs GOEX

Themes Gold Miners ETF

AUMIBNasdaq

Global X Gold Explorers ETF

GOEXCNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

AUMI −0.30pt a year

AUMI0.35%GOEX0.65%

Avg volume · 30D

GOEX 3.0×the volume

AUMI2.41KGOEX7.29K

AUMI vs GOEX Performance

Nov 3, 2025 – Nov 3, 2026

+7.9%AUMI+8.8%GOEX

Nov 3, 2025 to Nov 3, 2026. AUMI +7.9%. GOEX +8.8%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.20%40%60%Nov 2025May 2026Nov 2026
Expense ratio
AUMI 0.35%, better
GOEX 0.65%
Fund size
AUMI $19M
GOEX $104M
1Y total return
AUMI +7.9%
GOEX +8.8%, better
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.97%
GOEX 2.53%, better
Holdings
AUMI 34
GOEX 54
Avg volume (30D)
AUMI 2.41K sh
GOEX 7.29K sh, better
NAV per share
AUMI $82.76
GOEX $71.13
52W range

ETF.net Grade

AUMI: Cost 94, Risk 47, Mission 75, Tradability 15, Holdings 78, Durability 22. GOEX: Cost 26, Risk 45, Mission 73, Tradability 25, Holdings 88, Durability 60.
Pillar letters and Scores for AUMI, GOEX, with each pillar’s weight
PillarAUMIGOEX
Cost30% weightA94HigherD26
Mission25% weightA75HigherA73
Risk15% weightC47HigherC45
Tradability15% weightF15D25Higher
Holdings10% weightA78A88Higher
Durability5% weightF22B60Higher

Rank among Precious Metals Miners funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. AUMI and GOEX are both graded against the same 18 Precious Metals Miners funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Precious Metals Miners⁠

Category · 18 funds
See all 18 ›

AUMI ranks 7th and GOEX 14th of 18 funds in the Precious Metals Miners Category.

  1. Rank 6BAGMIThemes Silver Miners ETFScore 62
  2. Rank 7BAUMIThemes Gold Miners ETFScore 61
  3. Rank 8BGDXJVanEck Junior Gold Miners ETFScore 59
  4. Rank 13CSILJAmplify Junior Silver Miners ETFScore 42
  5. Rank 14CGOEXGlobal X Gold Explorers ETFScore 40
  6. Rank 14CPMTLFIRST TRUST INDXX QUALITY PRECIOUS METALS MINERS ETFScore 40

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

AUMIBThemes Gold Miners ETF

GOEXCGlobal X Gold Explorers ETF

In short

AUMI Gold miners with the blends stripped out. AUMI tracks an index of roughly 30 large miners that must earn at least 90% of revenue from gold, and it charges less than the typical fund in its group.

GOEX Most gold funds buy the miners already pulling metal out of the ground. GOEX buys the ones still looking for it: a global basket of explorers and developers, tracking a Solactive index since 2010.

Stated mandate

AUMI The Fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, an index of companies active in the gold mining industry. It uses a passive/indexing approach to pursue that objective.

GOEX The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the price and yield performance of the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index.

Why people hold it

  • AUMI The "pure" in the index name is a rule: members must generate at least 90% of revenue from gold mining, so copper-and-gold conglomerates and diversified diggers stay out.solactive.comthemesetfs.com
  • A 0.35% fee undercuts the peer-group median and the category's household names, VanEck's GDX (0.51%) and iShares' RING (0.39%).
  • Roughly 30 names, free-float weighted, rebuilt on a set schedule: a concentrated, rules-based way to own the diggers rather than the metal.solactive.com
  • GOEX Owns the front end of the gold supply chain: explorers and developers hunting deposits and building mines, not the established producers most gold funds lean on.
  • About 50 names, a global mandate, and a portfolio that stays tight to the explorers-and-developers index it names.
  • Trading since 2010, so there is a real record across more than one full gold cycle to dig through.

Worth knowing

  • AUMI Thinly traded and small next to the group's giants, so bid-ask spreads can be wider and big orders can push the price.
  • Concentrated by design and non-diversified: about 30 miners, one commodity, plus mine-level risks like costs, permits and politics.themesetfs.com
  • Launched in December 2023, so the live track record is short, and cash comes back once or twice a year rather than monthly.
  • GOEX At 0.65% a year it costs more than the category heavyweights: GDX charges 0.51%, RING 0.39%.
  • It trades lightly next to the big gold-miner funds, so bid-ask spreads can widen when markets move fast.
  • Explorers and developers often have no producing mine and no revenue, which makes for a bumpier ride than producer-heavy gold funds.

Full AUMI profile⁠

Full GOEX profile⁠

AUMI vs GOEX Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

AUMI vs GOEX Cost

Overpaying GOEX vs AUMI

$5,591

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • AUMI 0.35%

    $7,126

  • GOEX 0.65%

    $12,717

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • AUMI 0.35%
  • GOEX 0.65%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$5K$10K$15K051015202530GOEX $12,717AUMI $7,126

Year by year

YearAUMIGOEXOverpaying
10$634$1,163$529
20$2,454$4,440$1,986
30$7,126$12,717$5,591

Expense ratio

  • 0.35%AUMI, cheaper
  • 0.65%GOEX
  • Middle half of Precious Metals Miners funds
  • Median 0.52%

AUMI cheapest of 18 funds

GOEX 12th cheapest of 18 funds

AUMI vs GOEX Dividends

Last 12 months to Nov 3, 2026
Yield (12M)
AUMI 0.97%
GOEX 2.53%, better
Payout (12M)
AUMI $0.80
GOEX $1.77
Last payment
AUMI $0.80
GOEX $0.09
Ex-dividend
AUMI Dec 18, 2025
GOEX Jun 29, 2026
Paid on
AUMI Dec 19, 2025
GOEX Jul 7, 2026
Frequency
AUMI Irregular
GOEX Twice a year

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

AUMIIrregular · 2 paymentsAll AUMI payments⁠
One bar per payment. 2 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Dec 24, 2024 $0.65; Dec 18, 2025 $0.80. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD
GOEXTwice a year · 13 paymentsAll GOEX payments⁠
One bar per payment. 13 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 27, 2019 $0.01; Dec 30, 2019 $0.41; Jun 29, 2020 $0.03; Dec 30, 2020 $0.90; Jun 29, 2021 $0.15; Dec 30, 2021 $0.54; Jun 29, 2022 $0.05; Dec 29, 2022 $0.21; Jun 29, 2023 $0.01; Jun 27, 2024 $0.006; Dec 30, 2024 $0.72; Dec 30, 2025 $1.67; Jun 29, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$12017202020232026YTD

AUMI vs GOEX Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
AUMI 43.7%since Jan 2024GOEX 44.7%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
AUMI 1.01since Jan 2024GOEX 1.00
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
AUMI −39.8%since Dec 2023GOEX −47.1%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
AUMI 0.05GOEX 1.03

Popular comparisons

  • AUMIBvsRINGB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GOEXCvsRINGB

    Global X Gold Explorers ETF · iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.39%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsGDXB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GOEXCvsGDXB

    Global X Gold Explorers ETF · VanEck Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.51%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • AUMIBvsSGDMB

    Themes Gold Miners ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.35% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • GOEXCvsSGDMB

    Global X Gold Explorers ETF · Sprott Gold Miners ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.65% · 0.46%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.