AVES ranks 2nd and EMMF 15th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
AVES vs EMMF
AVES −0.12pt a year
0.36%0.48%
AVES 7.2×the volume
98.2K13.6K
EMMF +1.1pt
+7.5%+8.6%
AVES vs EMMF Performance
+43.3%+51.1%
- AVES 0.36%, better
- EMMF 0.48%
- AVES $1.45B
- EMMF $180M
- AVES +7.8%
- EMMF +11.4%, better
- AVES 3.69%, better
- EMMF 1.45%
- AVES 1998
- EMMF 225
- AVES 98.2K sh, better
- EMMF 13.6K sh
- AVES $60.00
- EMMF $34.68
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVES | EMMF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | D37 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | C48 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | F20 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | C53 |
| Durability | B57Higher | C41 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. AVES and EMMF are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVESA
EMMFD
In short
AVES Avantis starts with the emerging markets universe and tilts it: cheap valuations, profitable companies, roughly 1,800 names from megacaps down to small caps. Broad EM exposure with a deliberate value-and-quality slant, priced under the typical multifactor rival.
EMMF EMMF scores emerging-markets stocks on value, quality and momentum together, then holds the winners in one roughly 240-name portfolio. A single-ticket factor blend from WisdomTree, live since 2018, priced at the middle of its peer group.
Stated mandate
AVES The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
EMMF The fund seeks capital appreciation through primarily investing in emerging-markets equity securities selected using composite multifactor scores.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVES vs EMMF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVES vs EMMF Cost
Overpaying EMMF vs AVES
$2,285
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVES 0.36%
$7,320
EMMF 0.48%
$9,605
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVES | EMMF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $865 | $213 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $3,328 | $806 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $9,605 | $2,285 |
- 0.36%AVES, cheaper
- 0.48%EMMF
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
AVES 8th cheapest of 20 funds
EMMF 13th cheapest of 20 funds
AVES vs EMMF Dividends
- AVES 3.69%, better
- EMMF 1.45%
- AVES $2.23
- EMMF $0.50
- AVES $0.62
- EMMF $0.15
- AVES Sep 8, 2026
- EMMF Sep 25, 2026
- AVES Sep 10, 2026
- EMMF Sep 29, 2026
- AVES Quarterly
- EMMF Quarterly
Distribution history
AVES vs EMMF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AVES
- EMMF
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVES 14.7%EMMF 14.7%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Return per unit of risk
- AVES 0.88, betterEMMF 0.87
- Worst fall
- AVES −27.4%EMMF −22.9%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AVES 0.98EMMF 0.89
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.