FDEM ranks 3rd and EMMF 15th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
EMMF vs FDEM
FDEM −0.23pt a year
0.48%0.25%
FDEM 6.4×the volume
13.6K87.5K
FDEM +0.7pt
+8.6%+9.3%
EMMF vs FDEM Performance
+51.1%+55.9%
- EMMF 0.48%
- FDEM 0.25%, better
- EMMF $180M
- FDEM $591M
- EMMF +11.4%
- FDEM +12.2%, better
- EMMF 1.45%
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- EMMF 225
- FDEM 229
- EMMF 13.6K sh
- FDEM 87.5K sh, better
- EMMF $34.68
- FDEM $33.73
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMMF | FDEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D37 | A92Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C48 | B56Higher |
| Tradability | F20 | B65Higher |
| Holdings | C53Higher | C42 |
| Durability | C41 | B65Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. EMMF and FDEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMMFD
FDEMA
In short
EMMF EMMF scores emerging-markets stocks on value, quality and momentum together, then holds the winners in one roughly 240-name portfolio. A single-ticket factor blend from WisdomTree, live since 2018, priced at the middle of its peer group.
FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.
Stated mandate
EMMF The fund seeks capital appreciation through primarily investing in emerging-markets equity securities selected using composite multifactor scores.
FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMMF vs FDEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMMF vs FDEM Cost
Overpaying EMMF vs FDEM
$4,446
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMMF 0.48%
$9,605
FDEM 0.25%
$5,159
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMMF | FDEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $865 | $455 | $410 |
| 20 | $3,328 | $1,769 | $1,559 |
| 30 | $9,605 | $5,159 | $4,446 |
- 0.48%EMMF
- 0.25%FDEM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
EMMF 13th cheapest of 20 funds
EMMF vs FDEM Dividends
- EMMF 1.45%
- FDEM 3.49%, better
- EMMF $0.50
- FDEM $1.17
- EMMF $0.15
- FDEM $0.38
- EMMF Sep 25, 2026
- FDEM Sep 18, 2026
- EMMF Sep 29, 2026
- FDEM Sep 22, 2026
- EMMF Quarterly
- FDEM Quarterly
Distribution history
EMMF vs FDEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMMF
- FDEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMMF 14.7%FDEM 13.8%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMMF 0.87FDEM 1.08, better
- Worst fall
- EMMF −22.9%, betterFDEM −24.2%
- Market sensitivity
- EMMF 0.89FDEM 0.98
Popular comparisons
- 0.48% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.48% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.