AVES ranks 2nd and QEMM 4th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
AVES vs QEMM
QEMM −0.06pt a year
0.36%0.30%
AVES 25.5×the volume
98.2K3.85K
AVES +0.7pt
+7.5%+6.8%
AVES vs QEMM Performance
+43.3%+38.9%
- AVES 0.36%
- QEMM 0.30%, better
- AVES $1.45B
- QEMM $56M
- AVES +7.8%
- QEMM +16.5%, better
- AVES 3.69%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- AVES 1998
- QEMM 836
- AVES 98.2K sh, better
- QEMM 3.85K sh
- AVES $60.00
- QEMM $76.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVES | QEMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A92Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | A88Higher | B59 |
| Durability | B57Higher | C52 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. AVES and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVESA
QEMMB
In short
AVES Avantis starts with the emerging markets universe and tilts it: cheap valuations, profitable companies, roughly 1,800 names from megacaps down to small caps. Broad EM exposure with a deliberate value-and-quality slant, priced under the typical multifactor rival.
QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
AVES The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVES vs QEMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVES vs QEMM Cost
Overpaying AVES vs QEMM
$1,171
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVES 0.36%
$7,320
QEMM 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVES | QEMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $545 | $107 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $2,113 | $409 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $6,149 | $1,171 |
- 0.36%AVES
- 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
AVES 8th cheapest of 20 funds
AVES vs QEMM Dividends
- AVES 3.69%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- AVES $2.23
- QEMM $3.52
- AVES $0.62
- QEMM $1.05
- AVES Sep 8, 2026
- QEMM Jun 1, 2026
- AVES Sep 10, 2026
- QEMM Jun 5, 2026
- AVES Quarterly
- QEMM Twice a year
Distribution history
AVES vs QEMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AVES
- QEMM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVES 14.7%QEMM 13.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- AVES 0.88QEMM 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- AVES −27.4%QEMM −27.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- AVES 0.98QEMM 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.