AVES ranks 2nd and JHEM 12th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
AVES vs JHEM
AVES −0.13pt a year
0.36%0.49%
AVES 1.7×the volume
99.4K59.5K
AVES +0.1pt
+7.3%+7.2%
AVES vs JHEM Performance
+42.5%+41.7%
- AVES 0.36%, better
- JHEM 0.49%
- AVES $1.45B
- JHEM $887M
- AVES +8.1%
- JHEM +16.6%, better
- AVES 3.70%, better
- JHEM 1.91%
- AVES 2007
- JHEM 891
- AVES 99.4K sh, better
- JHEM 59.5K sh
- AVES $58.84
- JHEM $36.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVES | JHEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | D26 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C51Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | A90Higher | B59 |
| Durability | B57 | B59Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. AVES and JHEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVESA
JHEMC
In short
AVES Avantis starts with the emerging markets universe and tilts it: cheap valuations, profitable companies, roughly 1,800 names from megacaps down to small caps. Broad EM exposure with a deliberate value-and-quality slant, priced under the typical multifactor rival.
JHEM Dimensional designs the index, John Hancock wraps it in an ETF: roughly 900 emerging-market stocks, sorted country by country toward cheaper, more profitable, smaller companies. Fee is 0.49%, net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
AVES The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
JHEM The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, investment results that closely correspond to the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVES vs JHEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVES vs JHEM Cost
Overpaying JHEM vs AVES
$2,472
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVES 0.36%
$7,320
JHEM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVES | JHEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $883 | $231 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $3,394 | $872 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $9,792 | $2,472 |
- 0.36%AVES, cheaper
- 0.49%JHEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
AVES 8th cheapest of 20 funds
JHEM 14th cheapest of 20 funds
AVES vs JHEM Dividends
- AVES 3.70%, better
- JHEM 1.91%
- AVES $2.23
- JHEM $0.71
- AVES $0.62
- JHEM $0.20
- AVES Sep 8, 2026
- JHEM Jun 26, 2026
- AVES Sep 10, 2026
- JHEM Jun 30, 2026
- AVES Quarterly
- JHEM Twice a year
Distribution history
AVES vs JHEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AVES
- JHEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVES 14.7%, betterJHEM 15.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVES 0.88JHEM 0.99, better
- Worst fall
- AVES −27.4%, betterJHEM −29.1%
- Market sensitivity
- AVES 1.01JHEM 1.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.