FDEM ranks 2nd and JHEM 12th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
FDEM vs JHEM
FDEM −0.24pt a year
0.25%0.49%
FDEM 1.5×the volume
88.9K59.5K
FDEM +2.0pt
+9.2%+7.2%
FDEM vs JHEM Performance
+55.6%+41.7%
- FDEM 0.25%, better
- JHEM 0.49%
- FDEM $499M
- JHEM $887M
- FDEM +13.6%
- JHEM +16.6%, better
- FDEM 3.47%, better
- JHEM 1.91%
- FDEM 229
- JHEM 891
- FDEM 88.9K sh, better
- JHEM 59.5K sh
- FDEM $32.97
- JHEM $36.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FDEM | JHEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D26 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B60Higher | C49 |
| Tradability | B63Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | C41 | B59Higher |
| Durability | B65Higher | B59 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. FDEM and JHEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FDEMA
JHEMC
In short
FDEM Value, quality, momentum and low-volatility screens run across emerging markets stocks, plus an unusual extra filter: a tilt toward names less correlated with US equities. Fidelity's in-house index, priced under the category median.
JHEM Dimensional designs the index, John Hancock wraps it in an ETF: roughly 900 emerging-market stocks, sorted country by country toward cheaper, more profitable, smaller companies. Fee is 0.49%, net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
FDEM The fund seeks to track, before fees and expenses, the Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor Index.
JHEM The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, investment results that closely correspond to the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FDEM vs JHEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FDEM vs JHEM Cost
Overpaying JHEM vs FDEM
$4,633
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FDEM 0.25%
$5,159
JHEM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FDEM | JHEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $455 | $883 | $428 |
| 20 | $1,769 | $3,394 | $1,625 |
| 30 | $5,159 | $9,792 | $4,633 |
- 0.25%FDEM, cheaper
- 0.49%JHEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
FDEM 2nd cheapest of 20 funds
JHEM 14th cheapest of 20 funds
FDEM vs JHEM Dividends
- FDEM 3.47%, better
- JHEM 1.91%
- FDEM $1.17
- JHEM $0.71
- FDEM $0.38
- JHEM $0.20
- FDEM Sep 18, 2026
- JHEM Jun 26, 2026
- FDEM Sep 22, 2026
- JHEM Jun 30, 2026
- FDEM Quarterly
- JHEM Twice a year
Distribution history
FDEM vs JHEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- FDEM
- JHEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FDEM 13.8%, betterJHEM 15.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- FDEM 1.08, betterJHEM 0.99
- Worst fall
- FDEM −24.2%, betterJHEM −29.1%
- Market sensitivity
- FDEM 0.98JHEM 1.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.25% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.25% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.