EMGF ranks 1st and JHEM 12th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
EMGF vs JHEM
EMGF −0.23pt a year
0.26%0.49%
EMGF 2.8×the volume
167K59.5K
EMGF +1.6pt
+8.8%+7.2%
EMGF vs JHEM Performance
+52.4%+41.7%
- EMGF 0.26%, better
- JHEM 0.49%
- EMGF $1.84B
- JHEM $887M
- EMGF +16.3%
- JHEM +16.6%, better
- EMGF 2.20%, better
- JHEM 1.91%
- EMGF 737
- JHEM 891
- EMGF 167K sh, better
- JHEM 59.5K sh
- EMGF $63.72
- JHEM $36.19
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMGF | JHEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | D26 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C41 | C49Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | C51 |
| Holdings | C52 | B59Higher |
| Durability | A90Higher | B59 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. EMGF and JHEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMGFA
JHEMC
In short
EMGF Emerging markets, sorted by factor screen instead of straight market cap. EMGF holds roughly 700 large- and mid-cap EM stocks picked for style-factor exposure, and charges 0.26% doing it, about half the multifactor EM norm.
JHEM Dimensional designs the index, John Hancock wraps it in an ETF: roughly 900 emerging-market stocks, sorted country by country toward cheaper, more profitable, smaller companies. Fee is 0.49%, net of a waiver through July 31, 2027.
Stated mandate
EMGF EMGF seeks to follow an index of large- and mid-capitalization emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to specified style factors, subject to constraints.
JHEM The fund seeks, before fees and expenses, investment results that closely correspond to the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMGF vs JHEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMGF vs JHEM Cost
Overpaying JHEM vs EMGF
$4,434
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMGF 0.26%
$5,358
JHEM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMGF | JHEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $883 | $410 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $3,394 | $1,556 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $9,792 | $4,434 |
- 0.26%EMGF, cheaper
- 0.49%JHEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
EMGF 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
JHEM 14th cheapest of 20 funds
EMGF vs JHEM Dividends
- EMGF 2.20%, better
- JHEM 1.91%
- EMGF $1.44
- JHEM $0.71
- EMGF $0.61
- JHEM $0.20
- EMGF Jun 15, 2026
- JHEM Jun 26, 2026
- EMGF Jun 18, 2026
- JHEM Jun 30, 2026
- EMGF Twice a year
- JHEM Twice a year
Distribution history
EMGF vs JHEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMGF
- JHEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMGF 16.3%JHEM 15.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMGF 1.09, betterJHEM 0.99
- Worst fall
- EMGF −27.1%, betterJHEM −29.1%
- Market sensitivity
- EMGF 1.02JHEM 1.11
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.