AVES ranks 2nd and MFEM 14th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
AVES vs MFEM
AVES −0.13pt a year
0.36%0.49%
AVES 5.3×the volume
98.2K18.4K
AVES +0.4pt
+7.5%+7.1%
AVES vs MFEM Performance
+43.3%+41.2%
- AVES 0.36%, better
- MFEM 0.49%
- AVES $1.45B
- MFEM $158M
- AVES +7.8%
- MFEM +17.7%, better
- AVES 3.69%, better
- MFEM 2.41%
- AVES 1998
- MFEM 689
- AVES 98.2K sh, better
- MFEM 18.4K sh
- AVES $60.00
- MFEM $26.81
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVES | MFEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B68Higher | D26 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C52Higher | D39 |
| Tradability | A92Higher | D37 |
| Holdings | A88 | A100Higher |
| Durability | B57Higher | D37 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. AVES and MFEM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVESA
MFEMC
In short
AVES Avantis starts with the emerging markets universe and tilts it: cheap valuations, profitable companies, roughly 1,800 names from megacaps down to small caps. Broad EM exposure with a deliberate value-and-quality slant, priced under the typical multifactor rival.
MFEM Most multifactor emerging-market funds pick their factor weights and leave them. PIMCO's version rotates, leaning toward factors that look cheap against their own history and are turning up. Contrarian machinery from Research Affiliates, roughly 800 stocks deep.
Stated mandate
AVES The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation.
MFEM The Fund seeks to track the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in the index’s component securities and is designed to provide long-only emerging-market equity exposure across multiple factors.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVES vs MFEM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVES vs MFEM Cost
Overpaying MFEM vs AVES
$2,472
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVES 0.36%
$7,320
MFEM 0.49%
$9,792
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVES | MFEM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $652 | $883 | $231 |
| 20 | $2,522 | $3,394 | $872 |
| 30 | $7,320 | $9,792 | $2,472 |
- 0.36%AVES, cheaper
- 0.49%MFEM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
AVES 8th cheapest of 20 funds
MFEM 14th cheapest of 20 funds
AVES vs MFEM Dividends
- AVES 3.69%, better
- MFEM 2.41%
- AVES $2.23
- MFEM $0.63
- AVES $0.62
- MFEM $0.22
- AVES Sep 8, 2026
- MFEM Oct 1, 2026
- AVES Sep 10, 2026
- MFEM Oct 5, 2026
- AVES Quarterly
- MFEM Quarterly
Distribution history
AVES vs MFEM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- AVES
- MFEM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVES 14.7%, betterMFEM 16.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVES 0.88MFEM 0.90, better
- Worst fall
- AVES −27.4%, betterMFEM −30.5%
- Market sensitivity
- AVES 0.98MFEM 1.08
Popular comparisons
- 0.36% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.36% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.30%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.