QEMM ranks 4th and MFEM 14th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
MFEM vs QEMM
QEMM −0.19pt a year
0.49%0.30%
MFEM 4.8×the volume
18.4K3.85K
MFEM +0.3pt
+7.1%+6.8%
MFEM vs QEMM Performance
+41.2%+38.9%
- MFEM 0.49%
- QEMM 0.30%, better
- MFEM $158M
- QEMM $56M
- MFEM +17.7%, better
- QEMM +16.5%
- MFEM 2.41%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- MFEM 689
- QEMM 836
- MFEM 18.4K sh, better
- QEMM 3.85K sh
- MFEM $26.81
- QEMM $76.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | MFEM | QEMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | D26 | A82Higher |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | D39 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | D37 | D38Higher |
| Holdings | A100Higher | B59 |
| Durability | D37 | C52Higher |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. MFEM and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
MFEMC
QEMMB
In short
MFEM Most multifactor emerging-market funds pick their factor weights and leave them. PIMCO's version rotates, leaning toward factors that look cheap against their own history and are turning up. Contrarian machinery from Research Affiliates, roughly 800 stocks deep.
QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
MFEM The Fund seeks to track the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Index. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in the index’s component securities and is designed to provide long-only emerging-market equity exposure across multiple factors.
QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
MFEM vs QEMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
MFEM vs QEMM Cost
Overpaying MFEM vs QEMM
$3,643
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
MFEM 0.49%
$9,792
QEMM 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | MFEM | QEMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $545 | $338 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $2,113 | $1,281 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $6,149 | $3,643 |
- 0.49%MFEM
- 0.30%QEMM, cheaper
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
MFEM 14th cheapest of 20 funds
MFEM vs QEMM Dividends
- MFEM 2.41%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- MFEM $0.63
- QEMM $3.52
- MFEM $0.22
- QEMM $1.05
- MFEM Oct 1, 2026
- QEMM Jun 1, 2026
- MFEM Oct 5, 2026
- QEMM Jun 5, 2026
- MFEM Quarterly
- QEMM Twice a year
Distribution history
MFEM vs QEMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- MFEM
- QEMM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- MFEM 16.9%QEMM 13.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- MFEM 0.90QEMM 1.00, better
- Worst fall
- MFEM −30.5%QEMM −27.1%, better
- Market sensitivity
- MFEM 1.08QEMM 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.