Skip to content

QEMM vs QLVE

State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

QEMMBNYSE Arca

Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

QLVEBNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

QLVE −0.12pt a year

QEMM0.30%QLVE0.18%

Avg volume · 30D

QEMM 9.5×the volume

QEMM3.85KQLVE404

5Y return · a year

QLVE +0.2pt

QEMM+6.8%QLVE+7.0%

QEMM vs QLVE Performance

Oct 29, 2021 – Oct 30, 2026

+38.9%QEMM+40.2%QLVE

Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. QEMM +38.9%. QLVE +40.2%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−20%0%20%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026
Expense ratio
QEMM 0.30%
QLVE 0.18%, better
Fund size
QEMM $56M
QLVE $16M
1Y total return
QEMM +16.5%, better
QLVE +11.2%
Yield (12M)
QEMM 4.66%, better
QLVE 3.17%
Holdings
QEMM 836
QLVE 155
Avg volume (30D)
QEMM 3.85K sh, better
QLVE 404 sh
NAV per share
QEMM $76.87
QLVE $32.48
52W range

ETF.net Grade

QEMM: Cost 82, Risk 67, Mission not scored, Tradability 38, Holdings 59, Durability 52. QLVE: Cost 100, Risk 66, Mission 93, Tradability 11, Holdings 32, Durability 33.
Pillar letters and Scores for QEMM, QLVE, with each pillar’s weight
PillarQEMMQLVE
Cost30% weightA82A100Higher
Mission25% weightNot scoredA93
Risk15% weightB67HigherB66
Tradability15% weightD38HigherF11
Holdings10% weightB59HigherD32
Durability5% weightC52HigherD33

Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. QEMM and QLVE are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

See all 20 ›

QEMM ranks 4th and QLVE 7th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.

  1. Rank 1AEMGFiShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETFScore 76
  2. Rank 2AAVESAvantis Emerging Markets Value ETFScore 71
  3. Rank 3AFDEMFidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETFScore 70
  4. Rank 4BQEMMState Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETFScore 64
  5. Rank 5BDFEVDimensional Emerging Markets Value ETFScore 63
  6. Rank 6BJPEMJPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETFScore 62
  7. Rank 7BQLVENorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETFScore 61
  8. Rank 8BROAMHartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETFScore 60

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

QEMMBState Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF

QLVEBNorthern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF

In short

QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.

QLVE Most emerging-markets factor funds chase value. QLVE goes the other way: cut the weakest fifth on quality, then optimize what is left toward lower volatility. Cost is 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027.

Stated mandate

QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.

QLVE The Fund is designed for investors seeking emerging-markets exposure with an emphasis on quality and low volatility. It seeks to match, before fees and expenses, the performance of the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index.

Why people hold it

  • QEMM One ticket, three tilts: the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series Index blends value, quality and low volatility, so no single style has to be in favor for the strategy to run as designed.ssga.com
  • At 0.30% a year it undercuts the typical fee in the multifactor emerging-markets crowd, and the portfolio is built by index rules rather than a manager's hunch.
  • Running since 2014 with roughly 800 holdings and State Street behind the wrapper: a long-lived option in a corner of the market where niche products often quietly close.
  • The low-volatility sleeve is the tell. This is emerging-markets exposure assembled to smooth the ride, not to chase the hottest single factor.ssga.com
  • QLVE At 0.18% net of a waiver through March 1, 2027, it undercuts every top-scoring fund in its peer group, including EMGF at 0.26% and FDEM at 0.25%.
  • The index cuts the lowest-quality fifth of emerging-markets large and mid caps on profitability, cash flow and capital deployment, then optimizes the rest for lower volatility.flexshares.comnortherntrust.com
  • Sector, industry and country weights are held within set bands of the parent benchmark and turnover is capped near 12% a rebalance, curbing the sector drift low-vol screens invite.northerntrust.comsec.gov
  • Sits in the upper half of its emerging-markets factor peer group and has stayed close to its stated index.

Worth knowing

  • QEMM Trades thinner than the category's household names, so spreads can be wider. That bites most on large or hurried orders.
  • Splitting the bet three ways dilutes each factor by design, so the portfolio rarely looks or moves like a plain-vanilla emerging-markets index.
  • Distributions land once or twice a year rather than quarterly, and peers such as EMGF carry a lower fee for multifactor EM exposure.
  • QLVE Thinly traded with a small asset base, so spreads can run wider than the category heavyweights and limit orders matter more.
  • Roughly 160 holdings with meaningful weight in the largest names, so it is more top-heavy than a broad emerging-markets index fund.
  • Lower volatility is the design goal, not an outcome the fund controls: the index aims to be calmer than its parent, and the fund tracks it either way.sec.govflexshares.com

Full QEMM profile⁠

Full QLVE profile⁠

QEMM vs QLVE Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

QEMM vs QLVE Cost

Overpaying QEMM vs QLVE

$2,400

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • QEMM 0.30%

    $6,149

  • QLVE 0.18%

    $3,749

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • QEMM 0.30%
  • QLVE 0.18%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2K$4K$6K$8K051015202530QEMM $6,149QLVE $3,749

Year by year

YearQEMMQLVEOverpaying
10$545$328$217
20$2,113$1,281$832
30$6,149$3,749$2,400

Expense ratio

  • 0.30%QEMM
  • 0.18%QLVE, cheaper
  • Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
  • Median 0.44%

QLVE cheapest of 20 funds

QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds

QEMM vs QLVE Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
QEMM 4.66%, better
QLVE 3.17%
Payout (12M)
QEMM $3.52
QLVE $1.02
Last payment
QEMM $1.05
QLVE $0.34
Ex-dividend
QEMM Jun 1, 2026
QLVE Sep 18, 2026
Paid on
QEMM Jun 5, 2026
QLVE Sep 24, 2026
Frequency
QEMM Twice a year
QLVE Quarterly

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

QEMMTwice a year · 19 paymentsAll QEMM payments⁠
One bar per payment. 19 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Jun 16, 2017 $0.42; Dec 15, 2017 $0.94; Jun 1, 2018 $0.37; Dec 21, 2018 $1.19; Jun 3, 2019 $0.52; Dec 20, 2019 $1.33; Jun 1, 2020 $0.48; Dec 18, 2020 $1.14; Jun 1, 2021 $0.36; Dec 17, 2021 $1.23; Jun 1, 2022 $0.59; Dec 16, 2022 $1.59; Jun 1, 2023 $1.23; Dec 15, 2023 $1.56; Jun 3, 2024 $1.20; Dec 18, 2024 $1.75; Jun 2, 2025 $0.76; Nov 25, 2025 $2.48; Jun 1, 2026 $1.05. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD
QLVEQuarterly · 26 paymentsAll QLVE payments⁠
One bar per payment. 26 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Sep 20, 2019 $0.11; Dec 20, 2019 $0.23; Mar 20, 2020 $0.0066; Jun 19, 2020 $0.17; Sep 18, 2020 $0.24; Dec 18, 2020 $0.03; Jun 18, 2021 $0.18; Sep 17, 2021 $0.24; Dec 17, 2021 $0.25; Jun 17, 2022 $0.17; Sep 16, 2022 $0.32; Dec 16, 2022 $0.06; Mar 17, 2023 $0.06; Jun 16, 2023 $0.15; Sep 15, 2023 $0.40; Dec 15, 2023 $0.09; Jun 21, 2024 $0.16; Sep 20, 2024 $0.09; Dec 20, 2024 $0.52; Mar 21, 2025 $0.09; Jun 20, 2025 $0.20; Sep 19, 2025 $0.21; Dec 19, 2025 $0.43; Dec 24, 2025 $0.0056; Jun 18, 2026 $0.24; Sep 18, 2026 $0.34. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$2.502017202020232026YTD

QEMM vs QLVE Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

  • QEMM
  • QLVE
Oct 29, 2021 to Oct 30, 2026. Worst fall: QEMM −27.1% · Oct 2022. Use the arrow keys to read each point.−25%−20%−15%−10%−5%0%Oct 2021Apr 2024Oct 2026

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
QEMM 13.3%QLVE 11.0%, better
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
QEMM 1.00QLVE 1.11, better
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
QEMM −27.1%QLVE −23.6%, better
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
QEMM 0.95QLVE 0.83

Popular comparisons

  • QEMMBvsEMGFA

    State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsEMGFA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QEMMBvsAVESA

    State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsAVESA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.36%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QEMMBvsFDEMA

    State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.30% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • QLVEBvsFDEMA

    Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility ETF · Fidelity Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.18% · 0.25%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.