EMGF ranks 1st and QEMM 4th of 20 funds in the Emerging Markets Multifactor Category.
EMGF vs QEMM
EMGF −0.04pt a year
0.26%0.30%
EMGF 40.4×the volume
156K3.85K
EMGF +1.8pt
+8.9%+7.1%
EMGF vs QEMM Performance
+53.9%+38.9%
- EMGF 0.26%, better
- QEMM 0.30%
- EMGF $1.79B
- QEMM $56M
- EMGF +14.5%
- QEMM +16.5%, better
- EMGF 2.19%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- EMGF 740
- QEMM 836
- EMGF 156K sh, better
- QEMM 3.85K sh
- EMGF $65.41
- QEMM $76.87
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | EMGF | QEMM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A92Higher | A82 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C43 | B67Higher |
| Tradability | A94Higher | D38 |
| Holdings | C48 | B59Higher |
| Durability | A89Higher | C52 |
Rank among Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
Same Category. EMGF and QEMM are both graded against the same 20 Emerging Markets Multifactor funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
EMGFA
QEMMB
In short
EMGF Emerging markets, sorted by factor screen instead of straight market cap. EMGF holds roughly 700 large- and mid-cap EM stocks picked for style-factor exposure, and charges 0.26% doing it, about half the multifactor EM norm.
QEMM Instead of betting on one factor, QEMM buys value, quality and low volatility across emerging markets at once, packing roughly 800 stocks into a single MSCI factor-blend index for 0.30% a year.
Stated mandate
EMGF EMGF seeks to follow an index of large- and mid-capitalization emerging-market stocks selected for favorable exposure to specified style factors, subject to constraints.
QEMM The fund seeks to track the MSCI Emerging Markets (EM) Factor Mix A-Series Index.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
EMGF vs QEMM Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
EMGF vs QEMM Cost
Overpaying QEMM vs EMGF
$791
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
EMGF 0.26%
$5,358
QEMM 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | EMGF | QEMM | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $545 | $72 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $2,113 | $275 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $6,149 | $791 |
- 0.26%EMGF, cheaper
- 0.30%QEMM
- Middle half of Emerging Markets Multifactor funds
- Median 0.44%
EMGF 3rd cheapest of 20 funds
QEMM 4th cheapest of 20 funds
EMGF vs QEMM Dividends
- EMGF 2.19%
- QEMM 4.66%, better
- EMGF $1.44
- QEMM $3.52
- EMGF $0.61
- QEMM $1.05
- EMGF Jun 15, 2026
- QEMM Jun 1, 2026
- EMGF Jun 18, 2026
- QEMM Jun 5, 2026
- EMGF Twice a year
- QEMM Twice a year
Distribution history
EMGF vs QEMM Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
- EMGF
- QEMM
Risk facts
- Volatility
- EMGF 16.3%QEMM 13.3%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- EMGF 1.09, betterQEMM 1.00
- Worst fall
- EMGF −27.1%QEMM −27.1%Same figure. Both funds show the same value, so neither comes out ahead.
- Market sensitivity
- EMGF 1.02QEMM 0.95
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.36%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.25%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.43%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.