AVGV ranks 1st and GKAT 5th of 15 funds in the Global Active Value Category.
AVGV vs GKAT
AVGV −0.33pt a year
0.26%0.59%
AVGV 26.4×the volume
51.2K1.94K
AVGV vs GKAT Performance
+24.2%+14.9%
- AVGV 0.26%, better
- GKAT 0.59%
- AVGV $480M
- GKAT $169M
- AVGV +24.2%, better
- GKAT +14.9%
- AVGV 2.00%
- GKAT
- AVGV 8
- GKAT 35
- AVGV 51.2K sh, better
- GKAT 1.94K sh
- AVGV $85.54
- GKAT $45.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVGV | GKAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | A71 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | A86Higher | C49 |
| Holdings | D26 | D38Higher |
| Durability | B67Higher | B66 |
Rank among Global Active Value funds
Same Category. AVGV and GKAT are both graded against the same 15 Global Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVGVA
GKATB
In short
AVGV One ticker for the world's value stocks: AVGV stacks six Avantis value funds into a 60% US, 30% developed, 10% emerging mix, small caps included, for 0.26% all in.
GKAT A boutique stock picker's global book in ETF form. Scharf buys companies it believes offer more long-term upside than downside risk, and the mandate keeps at least 40% of assets outside the US. Launched 2025, priced at 0.59% a year.
Stated mandate
AVGV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a fund-of-funds structure investing in other Avantis ETFs. Those underlying funds are broadly diversified equity portfolios that select or overweight securities expected to offer higher returns or better risk characteristics than a passive market-cap-weighted index.
GKAT The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing mainly in U.S. and non-U.S. equities that the Adviser believes offer substantially more long-term appreciation potential than downside risk. It normally invests at least 40% of assets in non-U.S. securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVGV vs GKAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVGV vs GKAT Cost
Overpaying GKAT vs AVGV
$6,277
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVGV 0.26%
$5,358
GKAT 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVGV | GKAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $1,058 | $585 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $4,051 | $2,213 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $11,635 | $6,277 |
- 0.26%AVGV, cheaper
- 0.59%GKAT
- Middle half of Global Active Value funds
- Median 0.68%
AVGV cheapest of 15 funds
GKAT 5th cheapest of 15 funds
AVGV vs GKAT Dividends
- AVGV 2.00%
- GKAT
- AVGV $1.71
- GKAT
- AVGV $0.32
- GKAT $0.04
- AVGV Sep 10, 2026
- GKAT Sep 29, 2026
- AVGV Sep 14, 2026
- GKAT Sep 30, 2026
- AVGV Quarterly
- GKAT Quarterly
Distribution history
AVGV vs GKAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVGV 12.5%GKAT 14.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVGV 1.38GKAT 0.78
- Worst fall
- AVGV −17.0%GKAT −10.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AVGV 0.81GKAT 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.