FPAG ranks 4th and GKAT 5th of 15 funds in the Global Active Value Category.
FPAG vs GKAT
FPAG −0.10pt a year
0.49%0.59%
FPAG 21.4×the volume
41.5K1.94K
FPAG vs GKAT Performance
+17.1%+14.9%
- FPAG 0.49%, better
- GKAT 0.59%
- FPAG $662M
- GKAT $169M
- FPAG +17.1%, better
- GKAT +14.9%
- FPAG 1.29%
- GKAT
- FPAG 72
- GKAT 35
- FPAG 41.5K sh, better
- GKAT 1.94K sh
- FPAG $41.86
- GKAT $45.33
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | FPAG | GKAT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A82Higher | A71 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | C44 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | C44 | C49Higher |
| Holdings | B63Higher | D38 |
| Durability | A73Higher | B66 |
Rank among Global Active Value funds
Same Category. FPAG and GKAT are both graded against the same 15 Global Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
FPAGB
GKATB
In short
FPAG FPA's contrarian value desk in ETF form: about 40 out-of-favor global large and mid caps, no sector constraints, 0.49% net of a waiver through January 31, 2027.
GKAT A boutique stock picker's global book in ETF form. Scharf buys companies it believes offer more long-term upside than downside risk, and the mandate keeps at least 40% of assets outside the US. Launched 2025, priced at 0.59% a year.
Stated mandate
FPAG The Fund seeks long-term growth of principal and income. It normally invests at least 95% of assets in equities, primarily publicly traded common stocks of mid- and large-cap U.S. and non-U.S. companies, including emerging-market companies.
GKAT The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing mainly in U.S. and non-U.S. equities that the Adviser believes offer substantially more long-term appreciation potential than downside risk. It normally invests at least 40% of assets in non-U.S. securities.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
FPAG vs GKAT Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
FPAG vs GKAT Cost
Overpaying GKAT vs FPAG
$1,843
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
FPAG 0.49%
$9,792
GKAT 0.59%
$11,635
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | FPAG | GKAT | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $883 | $1,058 | $175 |
| 20 | $3,394 | $4,051 | $657 |
| 30 | $9,792 | $11,635 | $1,843 |
- 0.49%FPAG, cheaper
- 0.59%GKAT
- Middle half of Global Active Value funds
- Median 0.68%
FPAG 3rd cheapest of 15 funds
GKAT 5th cheapest of 15 funds
FPAG vs GKAT Dividends
- FPAG 1.29%
- GKAT
- FPAG $0.54
- GKAT
- FPAG $0.09
- GKAT $0.04
- FPAG Sep 15, 2026
- GKAT Sep 29, 2026
- FPAG Sep 22, 2026
- GKAT Sep 30, 2026
- FPAG Quarterly
- GKAT Quarterly
Distribution history
FPAG vs GKAT Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- FPAG 12.4%GKAT 14.0%
- Return per unit of risk
- FPAG 1.01GKAT 0.78
- Worst fall
- FPAG −18.1%GKAT −10.4%
- Market sensitivity
- FPAG 0.97GKAT 0.84
Popular comparisons
- 0.49% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.49% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.59% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.