AVGV ranks 1st and WBIF 11th of 15 funds in the Global Active Value Category.
AVGV vs WBIF
AVGV −1.44pt a year
0.26%1.70%
AVGV 13.9×the volume
51.2K3.69K
AVGV +10.2pt
+23.1%+12.9%
AVGV vs WBIF Performance
+24.2%+17.3%
- AVGV 0.26%, better
- WBIF 1.70%
- AVGV $480M
- WBIF $23M
- AVGV +24.2%, better
- WBIF +17.3%
- AVGV 2.00%, better
- WBIF 0.00%
- AVGV 8
- WBIF 69
- AVGV 51.2K sh, better
- WBIF 3.69K sh
- AVGV $85.54
- WBIF $36.55
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVGV | WBIF |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A100Higher | F0 |
| Mission | ||
| Risk | B62Higher | B59 |
| Tradability | A86Higher | B61 |
| Holdings | D26 | A76Higher |
| Durability | B67Higher | C41 |
Rank among Global Active Value funds
Same Category. AVGV and WBIF are both graded against the same 15 Global Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVGVA
WBIFD
In short
AVGV One ticker for the world's value stocks: AVGV stacks six Avantis value funds into a 60% US, 30% developed, 10% emerging mix, small caps included, for 0.26% all in.
WBIF A 2014-vintage active value fund with an unusual escape hatch: its sell discipline can park a big slice of the portfolio in cash. Roughly 30 names, a global hunting ground, and a price tag well above the typical value ETF.
Stated mandate
AVGV The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation through a fund-of-funds structure investing in other Avantis ETFs. Those underlying funds are broadly diversified equity portfolios that select or overweight securities expected to offer higher returns or better risk characteristics than a passive market-cap-weighted index.
WBIF The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and potential current income while attempting to protect principal in unfavorable markets. It actively invests across domestic and foreign companies of all capitalization sizes and may use tactical investments.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVGV vs WBIF Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVGV vs WBIF Cost
Overpaying WBIF vs AVGV
$23,683
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVGV 0.26%
$5,358
WBIF 1.70%
$29,041
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVGV | WBIF | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $473 | $2,911 | $2,438 |
| 20 | $1,838 | $10,606 | $8,768 |
| 30 | $5,358 | $29,041 | $23,683 |
- 0.26%AVGV, cheaper
- 1.70%WBIF
- Middle half of Global Active Value funds
- Median 0.68%
AVGV cheapest of 15 funds
WBIF 15th cheapest of 15 funds
AVGV vs WBIF Dividends
- AVGV 2.00%, better
- WBIF 0.00%
- AVGV $1.71
- WBIF None
- AVGV $0.32
- WBIF
- AVGV Sep 10, 2026
- WBIF
- AVGV Sep 14, 2026
- WBIF
- AVGV Quarterly
- WBIF
Distribution history
AVGV vs WBIF Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVGV 12.5%, betterWBIF 13.3%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVGV 1.38, betterWBIF 0.65
- Worst fall
- AVGV −17.0%WBIF −20.3%
- Market sensitivity
- AVGV 0.81WBIF 1.11
AVGV and WBIF in the news
Popular comparisons
- 0.26% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.50%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.33%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.26% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 1.70% · 0.49%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
