Skip to content

FPAG vs WBIF

FPA Global Equity ETF

FPAGBCboe

WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF

WBIFDNYSE Arca

Overlap

Expense ratio

FPAG −1.21pt a year

FPAG0.49%WBIF1.70%

Avg volume · 30D

FPAG 11.2×the volume

FPAG41.5KWBIF3.69K

FPAG vs WBIF Performance

Oct 31, 2025 – Oct 30, 2026

+17.1%FPAG+17.3%WBIF

Oct 31, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026. FPAG +17.1%. WBIF +17.3%. Use the arrow keys to read each point.0%5%10%20%Oct 2025Apr 2026Oct 2026
Expense ratio
FPAG 0.49%, better
WBIF 1.70%
Fund size
FPAG $662M
WBIF $23M
1Y total return
FPAG +17.1%
WBIF +17.3%, better
Yield (12M)
FPAG 1.29%, better
WBIF 0.00%
Holdings
FPAG 72
WBIF 69
Avg volume (30D)
FPAG 41.5K sh, better
WBIF 3.69K sh
NAV per share
FPAG $41.86
WBIF $36.55
52W range

ETF.net Grade

FPAG: Cost 82, Risk 44, Mission not scored, Tradability 44, Holdings 63, Durability 73. WBIF: Cost 0, Risk 59, Mission not scored, Tradability 61, Holdings 76, Durability 41.
Pillar letters and Scores for FPAG, WBIF, with each pillar’s weight
PillarFPAGWBIF
Cost30% weightA82HigherF0
Mission25% weightNot scoredNot scored
Risk15% weightC44B59Higher
Tradability15% weightC44B61Higher
Holdings10% weightB63A76Higher
Durability5% weightA73HigherC41

Rank among Global Active Value funds

Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Same Category. FPAG and WBIF are both graded against the same 15 Global Active Value funds, so their Grades compare head to head.

Global Active Value⁠

Category · 15 funds
See all 15 ›

FPAG ranks 4th and WBIF 11th of 15 funds in the Global Active Value Category.

  1. Rank 1AAVGVAvantis All Equity Markets Value ETF 9Score 77
  2. Rank 2AFEGEFirst Eagle Global Equity ETFScore 74
  3. Rank 3ASFGVSequoia Global Value ETFScore 73
  4. Rank 4BFPAGFPA Global Equity ETFScore 63
  5. Rank 5BGKATScharf Global Opportunity ETFScore 60
  6. Rank 10DHWOHotchkis & Wiley Opportunities FundScore 37
  7. Rank 11DWBIFWBI BullBear Value 3000 ETFScore 36
  8. Rank 12DCGVConductor Global Equity Value ETFScore 31

Our read on each fund

ETF.net Research

FPAGBFPA Global Equity ETF

WBIFDWBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF

In short

FPAG FPA's contrarian value desk in ETF form: about 40 out-of-favor global large and mid caps, no sector constraints, 0.49% net of a waiver through January 31, 2027.

WBIF A 2014-vintage active value fund with an unusual escape hatch: its sell discipline can park a big slice of the portfolio in cash. Roughly 30 names, a global hunting ground, and a price tag well above the typical value ETF.

Stated mandate

FPAG The Fund seeks long-term growth of principal and income. It normally invests at least 95% of assets in equities, primarily publicly traded common stocks of mid- and large-cap U.S. and non-U.S. companies, including emerging-market companies.

WBIF The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation and potential current income while attempting to protect principal in unfavorable markets. It actively invests across domestic and foreign companies of all capitalization sizes and may use tactical investments.

Why people hold it

  • FPAG The ETF wrapper for a strategy FPA has run for years: bottom-up fundamental research, global large and mid caps, bought when businesses look out of favor, with no sector constraints on the portfolio.fpa.com
  • 0.49% net of a waiver through January 31, 2027 sits below the global value category median, and just under First Eagle's FEGE at 0.50% net of a waiver through December 31, 2026.
  • Genuinely active, not index-hugging: roughly 40 positions, cash typically under 5%, and active share FPA describes as typically above 90% versus its MSCI ACWI reference.fpa.com
  • Prospectus keeps it simple: normally at least 95% of assets in equities, mid- and large-cap U.S. and non-U.S. names, emerging markets included. One of the stronger builds on a crowded global value shelf.
  • WBIF Cash counts as a position here. The selection process evaluates cash and cash equivalents alongside stocks, and the fund can hold a significant percentage of net assets there.wbietfs.com
  • A wide hunting ground: value names across the US, developed international and emerging markets, at every market cap, plus room for tactical positions.
  • Concentrated on purpose at about 30 holdings, so individual picks carry real weight instead of getting diluted across hundreds of names.
  • Launched in 2014, early in the active equity ETF wave, so it has a live record through several full market cycles rather than a backtest.

Worth knowing

  • FPAG That 0.49% is a waived rate. Gross is 0.86%, so what you pay after January 31, 2027 depends on FPA extending the waiver.
  • One of the thinner-traded funds in its category. Spreads can widen, and the open and close are the rougher moments of the day.
  • A focused, unconstrained book of about 40 names with no sector limits can look nothing like a global index, and move nothing like one either. Income arrives quarterly.fpa.com
  • WBIF At 1.52% a year it costs more than double the 0.63% median of its global value peer group. Cheaper active options in that cohort include AVGV at 0.28% and FEGE at 0.50%.
  • Small and thinly traded, so spreads can run wider and sizable orders can move the price more than in the category's household names.
  • The flip side of the cash option: the prospectus flags that extended stretches in cash or equivalents can lag other investments and work against the fund's objective.wbietfs.com

Full FPAG profile⁠

Full WBIF profile⁠

FPAG vs WBIF Holdings

How we measure overlap

Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.

FPAG vs WBIF Cost

Overpaying WBIF vs FPAG

$19,249

On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.

  • FPAG 0.49%

    $9,792

  • WBIF 1.70%

    $29,041

$10,000
30 years

Cost over time

  • FPAG 0.49%
  • WBIF 1.70%
  • Overpaying
One line per fund, from year 0 to year 30. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$10K$20K$30K051015202530WBIF $29,041FPAG $9,792

Year by year

YearFPAGWBIFOverpaying
10$883$2,911$2,028
20$3,394$10,606$7,212
30$9,792$29,041$19,249

Expense ratio

  • 0.49%FPAG, cheaper
  • 1.70%WBIF
  • Middle half of Global Active Value funds
  • Median 0.68%

FPAG 3rd cheapest of 15 funds

WBIF 15th cheapest of 15 funds

FPAG vs WBIF Dividends

Last 12 months to Oct 30, 2026
Yield (12M)
FPAG 1.29%, better
WBIF 0.00%
Payout (12M)
FPAG $0.54
WBIF None
Last payment
FPAG $0.09
WBIF No data
Ex-dividend
FPAG Sep 15, 2026
WBIF No data
Paid on
FPAG Sep 22, 2026
WBIF No data
Frequency
FPAG Quarterly
WBIF No data

Distribution history

Per share, 2017 to 2026, same scale for both

FPAGQuarterly · 18 paymentsAll FPAG payments⁠
One bar per payment. 18 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 15, 2022 $0.01; Jun 15, 2022 $0.11; Sep 15, 2022 $0.07; Dec 15, 2022 $0.06; Mar 15, 2023 $0.02; Jun 15, 2023 $0.15; Sep 14, 2023 $0.10; Dec 14, 2023 $0.12; Mar 15, 2024 $0.05; Jun 14, 2024 $0.09; Sep 13, 2024 $0.08; Dec 13, 2024 $0.21; Mar 13, 2025 $0.18; Jun 13, 2025 $0.16; Sep 15, 2025 $0.08; Dec 12, 2025 $0.32; Jun 16, 2026 $0.13; Sep 15, 2026 $0.09. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD
WBIF29 paymentsAll WBIF payments⁠
One bar per payment. 29 payments from 2017 to 2026 YTD. Mar 14, 2017 $0.08; Jun 27, 2017 $0.08; Sep 19, 2017 $0.04; Dec 28, 2017 $0.02; Mar 13, 2018 $0.05; Jun 26, 2018 $0.08; Sep 18, 2018 $0.08; Dec 28, 2018 $0.08; Mar 12, 2019 $0.10; Jun 25, 2019 $0.07; Sep 17, 2019 $0.04; Dec 30, 2019 $0.08; Sep 15, 2020 $0.02; Mar 16, 2021 $0.16; Jun 25, 2021 $0.20; Sep 27, 2021 $0.07; Dec 29, 2021 $0.36; Sep 28, 2022 $0.04; Dec 28, 2022 $0.23; Mar 29, 2023 $0.11; Jun 28, 2023 $0.02; Sep 27, 2023 $0.0028; Dec 27, 2023 $0.10; Mar 26, 2024 $0.12; Jun 27, 2024 $0.14; Sep 27, 2024 $0.04; Dec 24, 2024 $0.03; Mar 27, 2025 $0.02; Sep 25, 2025 $0.02. Use the arrow keys to read each point.$0$0.252017202020232026YTD

FPAG vs WBIF Risk

Fall from peak · 5 years

This chart needs five years of history for both funds.

Risk facts

VolatilityStd dev, 3 years
FPAG 12.4%since Apr 2024WBIF 13.3%
Return per unit of riskSharpe ratio, 3 years
FPAG 1.01since Apr 2024WBIF 0.65
Worst fallMax drawdown, 5 years
FPAG −18.1%since Mar 2024WBIF −20.3%
Market sensitivityBeta, 5 years
FPAG 0.97WBIF 1.11

FPAG and WBIF in the news

Popular comparisons

  • FPAGBvsAVGVA

    FPA Global Equity ETF · Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF 9

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WBIFDvsAVGVA

    WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF · Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF 9

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.26%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FPAGBvsFEGEA

    FPA Global Equity ETF · First Eagle Global Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WBIFDvsFEGEA

    WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF · First Eagle Global Equity ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.50%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • FPAGBvsSFGVA

    FPA Global Equity ETF · Sequoia Global Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    0.49% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
  • WBIFDvsSFGVA

    WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF · Sequoia Global Value ETF

    Expense ratio
    1.70% · 0.33%
    Category
    Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.