AVLC ranks 1st and BCHP 61st of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
AVLC vs BCHP
AVLC −0.43pt a year
0.15%0.58%
AVLC 3.0×the volume
84.5K27.9K
AVLC +8.5pt
+22.5%+14.0%
AVLC vs BCHP Performance
+17.4%+1.1%
- AVLC 0.15%, better
- BCHP 0.58%
- AVLC $1.53B
- BCHP $224M
- AVLC +17.4%, better
- BCHP +1.1%
- AVLC 0.88%, better
- BCHP 0.00%
- AVLC 857
- BCHP 25
- AVLC 84.5K sh, better
- BCHP 27.9K sh
- AVLC $87.30
- BCHP $37.16
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVLC | BCHP |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | B57 |
| Mission | B64 | |
| Risk | B69Higher | D25 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | B65 |
| Holdings | A87Higher | D37 |
| Durability | A81Higher | B68 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. AVLC and BCHP are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVLCA
BCHPC
In short
AVLC Active management with index-fund manners: roughly 900 U.S. large caps, with the dial turned toward cheaper, more profitable companies. Avantis charges 0.15% a year to do it.
BCHP Principal's stock-picker take on the blue chips: a focused, actively run basket of big US companies the manager thinks can keep compounding, priced below what the average active US equity ETF charges.
Stated mandate
AVLC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests broadly in U.S. large-capitalization companies while using active decisions to overweight lower valuations and higher profitability.
BCHP The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in large-capitalization equity securities that the adviser considers blue-chip companies, with an emphasis on capital-growth potential.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVLC vs BCHP Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVLC vs BCHP Cost
Overpaying BCHP vs AVLC
$8,316
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVLC 0.15%
$3,137
BCHP 0.58%
$11,453
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVLC | BCHP | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $1,041 | $767 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $3,986 | $2,915 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $11,453 | $8,316 |
- 0.15%AVLC, cheaper
- 0.58%BCHP
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
AVLC 6th cheapest of 121 funds
BCHP 51st cheapest of 121 funds
AVLC vs BCHP Dividends
- AVLC 0.88%, better
- BCHP 0.00%
- AVLC $0.79
- BCHP None
- AVLC $0.19
- BCHP
- AVLC Sep 8, 2026
- BCHP
- AVLC Sep 10, 2026
- BCHP
- AVLC Quarterly
- BCHP
Distribution history
AVLC vs BCHP Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVLC 12.7%, betterBCHP 15.5%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVLC 1.43, betterBCHP 0.69
- Worst fall
- AVLC −19.6%BCHP −18.6%
- Market sensitivity
- AVLC 1.00BCHP 1.05
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.