DFAC ranks 3rd and BCHP 61st of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
BCHP vs DFAC
DFAC −0.41pt a year
0.58%0.17%
DFAC 71.6×the volume
27.9K2M
DFAC +7.1pt
+14.0%+21.1%
BCHP vs DFAC Performance
+1.1%+17.3%
- BCHP 0.58%
- DFAC 0.17%, better
- BCHP $224M
- DFAC $85.6B
- BCHP +1.1%
- DFAC +17.3%, better
- BCHP 0.00%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- BCHP 25
- DFAC 2549
- BCHP 27.9K sh
- DFAC 2M sh, better
- BCHP $37.16
- DFAC $43.78
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BCHP | DFAC |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | A94Higher |
| Mission | B64 | A100Higher |
| Risk | D25 | B65Higher |
| Tradability | B65 | A86Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | A89Higher |
| Durability | B68 | A97Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. BCHP and DFAC are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BCHPC
DFACA
In short
BCHP Principal's stock-picker take on the blue chips: a focused, actively run basket of big US companies the manager thinks can keep compounding, priced below what the average active US equity ETF charges.
DFAC Dimensional's whole-market workhorse: roughly 2,600 US stocks in one ticker, run by managers who weigh federal tax consequences before they trade, at a fee closer to index funds than to active ones.
Stated mandate
BCHP The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in large-capitalization equity securities that the adviser considers blue-chip companies, with an emphasis on capital-growth potential.
DFAC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation while considering federal income-tax implications in its investment decisions.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BCHP vs DFAC Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BCHP vs DFAC Cost
Overpaying BCHP vs DFAC
$7,907
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BCHP 0.58%
$11,453
DFAC 0.17%
$3,546
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BCHP | DFAC | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $310 | $731 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $1,211 | $2,775 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $3,546 | $7,907 |
- 0.58%BCHP
- 0.17%DFAC, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAC 8th cheapest of 121 funds
BCHP 51st cheapest of 121 funds
BCHP vs DFAC Dividends
- BCHP 0.00%
- DFAC 0.88%, better
- BCHP None
- DFAC $0.39
- BCHP
- DFAC $0.10
- BCHP
- DFAC Sep 22, 2026
- BCHP
- DFAC Sep 24, 2026
- BCHP
- DFAC Quarterly
Distribution history
BCHP vs DFAC Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BCHP 15.5%DFAC 12.6%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BCHP 0.69DFAC 1.32, better
- Worst fall
- BCHP −18.6%DFAC −23.1%
- Market sensitivity
- BCHP 1.05DFAC 0.99
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.17% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.