DFAU ranks 2nd and BCHP 61st of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
BCHP vs DFAU
DFAU −0.46pt a year
0.58%0.12%
DFAU 19.6×the volume
27.9K547K
DFAU +7.4pt
+14.0%+21.4%
BCHP vs DFAU Performance
+1.1%+14.5%
- BCHP 0.58%
- DFAU 0.12%, better
- BCHP $224M
- DFAU $12.6B
- BCHP +1.1%
- DFAU +14.5%, better
- BCHP 0.00%
- DFAU 0.91%, better
- BCHP 25
- DFAU 2163
- BCHP 27.9K sh
- DFAU 547K sh, better
- BCHP $37.16
- DFAU $50.91
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | BCHP | DFAU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | B57 | A97Higher |
| Mission | B64 | A84Higher |
| Risk | D25 | B63Higher |
| Tradability | B65 | A87Higher |
| Holdings | D37 | A84Higher |
| Durability | B68 | A91Higher |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. BCHP and DFAU are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
BCHPC
DFAUA
In short
BCHP Principal's stock-picker take on the blue chips: a focused, actively run basket of big US companies the manager thinks can keep compounding, priced below what the average active US equity ETF charges.
DFAU Active management priced like an index fund. Dimensional spreads across roughly 2,400 US stocks, then tilts the weights toward value, profitability and momentum instead of simply mirroring the Russell 3000.
Stated mandate
BCHP The Fund seeks long-term growth of capital. It normally invests at least 80% of assets in large-capitalization equity securities that the adviser considers blue-chip companies, with an emphasis on capital-growth potential.
DFAU Seeks long-term capital appreciation. It uses an integrated research, portfolio-design, management, and trading process to build a broadly diversified portfolio of U.S. companies while balancing long-term return drivers, risk, shorter-term considerations, and trading costs.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
BCHP vs DFAU Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
BCHP vs DFAU Cost
Overpaying BCHP vs DFAU
$8,933
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
BCHP 0.58%
$11,453
DFAU 0.12%
$2,520
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | BCHP | DFAU | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $1,041 | $220 | $821 |
| 20 | $3,986 | $859 | $3,127 |
| 30 | $11,453 | $2,520 | $8,933 |
- 0.58%BCHP
- 0.12%DFAU, cheaper
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
DFAU 4th cheapest of 121 funds
BCHP 51st cheapest of 121 funds
BCHP vs DFAU Dividends
- BCHP 0.00%
- DFAU 0.91%, better
- BCHP None
- DFAU $0.47
- BCHP
- DFAU $0.12
- BCHP
- DFAU Sep 22, 2026
- BCHP
- DFAU Sep 24, 2026
- BCHP
- DFAU Quarterly
Distribution history
BCHP vs DFAU Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- BCHP 15.5%DFAU 12.4%, better
- Return per unit of risk
- BCHP 0.69DFAU 1.38, better
- Worst fall
- BCHP −18.6%DFAU −23.6%
- Market sensitivity
- BCHP 1.05DFAU 1.01
Popular comparisons
- 0.58% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.15%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.58% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.12% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.