AVLC ranks 1st and LCDS 48th of 121 funds in the US Active Equity Category.
AVLC vs LCDS
AVLC −0.15pt a year
0.15%0.30%
AVLC 123.3×the volume
78.8K639
AVLC vs LCDS Performance
+16.4%+13.1%
- AVLC 0.15%, better
- LCDS 0.30%
- AVLC $1.58B
- LCDS $16M
- AVLC +16.4%, better
- LCDS +13.1%
- AVLC 0.87%, better
- LCDS 0.86%
- AVLC 849
- LCDS 113
- AVLC 78.8K sh, better
- LCDS 639 sh
- AVLC $90.02
- LCDS $73.00
ETF.net Grade
| Pillar | AVLC | LCDS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | A96Higher | A83 |
| Mission | A81 | |
| Risk | B66Higher | B60 |
| Tradability | A93Higher | F9 |
| Holdings | A86Higher | B63 |
| Durability | A81Higher | C40 |
Rank among US Active Equity funds
Same Category. AVLC and LCDS are both graded against the same 121 US Active Equity funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
Our read on each fund
AVLCA
LCDSB
In short
AVLC Active management with index-fund manners: roughly 900 U.S. large caps, with the dial turned toward cheaper, more profitable companies. Avantis charges 0.15% a year to do it.
LCDS J.P. Morgan aims its human stock analysts at a data-science engine and builds a roughly 110-stock alternative to the S&P 500 from what comes out. Active large-cap core, priced at 0.30%, well under the usual active tab.
Stated mandate
AVLC The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation. It invests broadly in U.S. large-capitalization companies while using active decisions to overweight lower valuations and higher profitability.
LCDS The fund seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities of large, established companies. Its approach combines fundamental research, data insights, and risk management to assess financial prospects and relative valuation.
Why people hold it
Worth knowing
AVLC vs LCDS Holdings
How we measure overlap
Each holding counts at its smaller weight in the two funds, summed over the full Holdings. Sector, country and asset class use the same rule on each fund’s split. Cash, FX and derivative lines stay out of the counts. Two bond funds get no overlap figure.
AVLC vs LCDS Cost
Overpaying LCDS vs AVLC
$3,012
On $10,000 over 30 years. 7% growth a year before fees, expense ratio only.
AVLC 0.15%
$3,137
LCDS 0.30%
$6,149
Cost over time
Year by year
| Year | AVLC | LCDS | Overpaying |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | $274 | $545 | $271 |
| 20 | $1,071 | $2,113 | $1,042 |
| 30 | $3,137 | $6,149 | $3,012 |
- 0.15%AVLC, cheaper
- 0.30%LCDS
- Middle half of US Active Equity funds
- Median 0.68%
AVLC 6th cheapest of 121 funds
LCDS 21st cheapest of 121 funds
AVLC vs LCDS Dividends
- AVLC 0.87%, better
- LCDS 0.86%
- AVLC $0.79
- LCDS $0.63
- AVLC $0.19
- LCDS $0.17
- AVLC Sep 8, 2026
- LCDS Sep 22, 2026
- AVLC Sep 10, 2026
- LCDS Sep 24, 2026
- AVLC Quarterly
- LCDS Quarterly
Distribution history
AVLC vs LCDS Risk
Fall from peak · 5 years
Risk facts
- Volatility
- AVLC 12.7%LCDS 11.9%
- Return per unit of risk
- AVLC 1.43LCDS 0.95
- Worst fall
- AVLC −19.6%LCDS −18.4%
- Market sensitivity
- AVLC 1.02LCDS 0.94
Popular comparisons
- 0.15% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.12%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.17%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.15% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.
- 0.30% · 0.26%
- Same Category. Both funds are graded against the same funds, so their Grades compare head to head.